Identifying the representational structure of affect using fMRI.
affect
amygdala
arousal
emotion
valence
Journal
Affective science
ISSN: 2662-205X
Titre abrégé: Affect Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101766948
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez:
2
8
2021
pubmed:
1
3
2020
medline:
1
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The events we experience day to day can be described in terms of their affective quality: some are rewarding, others are upsetting, and still others are inconsequential. These natural distinctions reflect an underlying representational structure used to classify affective quality. In affective psychology, many experiments model this representational structure with two dimensions, using either the dimensions of valence and arousal, or alternatively, the dimensions of positivity and negativity. Using fMRI, we show that it is optimal to use all four dimensions to examine the data. Our findings include: (1) a gradient representation of valence that is anatomically organized along the fusiform gyrus, and (2) distinct subregions within bilateral amygdala that track arousal versus negativity. Importantly, these results would have remained concealed had either of the commonly used 2-dimensional approaches been adopted
Identifiants
pubmed: 34337429
doi: 10.1007/s42761-020-00007-9
pmc: PMC8323657
mid: NIHMS1676273
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
42-56Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R56 MH080716
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest. The authors have no conflicts of interest with respect to authorship or publication of this article.
Références
Science. 2019 Dec 20;366(6472):1517-1522
pubmed: 31857485
Am Psychol. 1995 May;50(5):372-85
pubmed: 7762889
Neuroreport. 2001 Aug 28;12(12):2779-83
pubmed: 11522965
Cereb Cortex. 2016 May;26(5):1910-1922
pubmed: 25631056
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Jan;23(1):49-60
pubmed: 22250290
Neurosci Lett. 2019 Feb 6;693:68-74
pubmed: 30473315
Front Neuroinform. 2009 Jan 15;2:10
pubmed: 19198666
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):917-40
pubmed: 23231533
Neuroimage. 2001 Jan;13(1):129-42
pubmed: 11133316
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):223-233
pubmed: 10827445
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 11;35(45):15145-56
pubmed: 26558785
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005 Nov;30(10):953-8
pubmed: 15963650
Psychol Bull. 1985 Sep;98(2):219-35
pubmed: 3901060
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Oct;20(10):1384-1394
pubmed: 28825719
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Aug;17(8):1114-22
pubmed: 24952643
J Neurosci. 2017 Sep 27;37(39):9510-9518
pubmed: 28874449
Psychol Sci. 2018 Oct;29(10):1706-1715
pubmed: 30130163
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 28;117(4):1924-1934
pubmed: 31907316
Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73
pubmed: 8812068
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Apr;11(4):423-5
pubmed: 18344996
Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Feb 15;73(4):360-70
pubmed: 22981656
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jan;4(1):95-102
pubmed: 11135651
Emotion. 2015 Feb;15(1):35-44
pubmed: 25664950
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):487-506
pubmed: 20957581
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Dec;20(12):1680-1685
pubmed: 29184202
Psychol Bull. 1999 Jan;125(1):3-30
pubmed: 9990843
J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 1;26(9):2564-70
pubmed: 16510734
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 May;12(3):508-526
pubmed: 28544868
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Aug;18(8):422-8
pubmed: 24835467
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29;34(5):1979-87
pubmed: 24478377
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Feb;90(2):288-307
pubmed: 16536652
J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15;22(16):7308-20
pubmed: 12177226
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Jun;64(6):1029-41
pubmed: 8326466