The effect of habitat restoration on macroinvertebrate communities in Shaoxi rivers, China.
Bio-indicator
China
Habitat restoration
Macroinvertebrate community compositions
Monitoring
River ecosystem
Zhejiang Province
Journal
Environmental science and pollution research international
ISSN: 1614-7499
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9441769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
29
01
2021
accepted:
17
07
2021
pubmed:
3
8
2021
medline:
6
1
2022
entrez:
2
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In recent decades, the biodiversity of freshwater environments has decreased sharply due to anthropogenic disturbances that damaged ecosystem structures and functions. Habitat restoration has emerged as an important method to mitigate the degradation of river ecosystems. Although in many cases a post-project monitoring has been promoted to access the restoration progress, it is still unclear how aquatic community changes following river habitat restoration in China. Macroinvertebrate communities intermediately positioned within ecosystem food webs play a key role in ecosystem processes within river ecosystem, driving energy flow and nutrient cycling. Here, benthic macroinvertebrates are used as bio-indicators to assess the ecosystem health of degraded urban rivers, restored urban rivers, and undisturbed rivers. This study aims to determine (i) how habitat restoration influences macroinvertebrates diversity and how this compared to degraded and reference conditions; (ii) how did macroinvertebrate community compositions differ in restored, degraded, and reference sites; and (iii) the environmental factors shaping macroinvertebrate communities. Habitat restoration significantly increased the diversity and richness of macroinvertebrate community and intolerant species and shifted the community composition towards reference status. Habitat characteristics and water chemistry, including substrate diversity, water velocity, and both nutrients (TN) and organic pollutants (TOC), appeared to shape the turnover of these communities. Habitat characteristics contributed to most of the variation of the entire macroinvertebrate community. Our research indicates that habitat restoration is an efficient approach to restore the aquatic community and hence improve river ecosystem health for freshwater conservation and sustainable management in Zhejiang province. This study strengthens our understanding of the changes of macroinvertebrate community after habitat restoration and important controlling variables that attribute to these changes, which provides an important guidance for future freshwater management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34338980
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15559-x
pii: 10.1007/s11356-021-15559-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
677-689Subventions
Organisme : Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University
ID : RDF-15-01-50
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
ID : BK20171238
Organisme : Foundation of Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, China West Normal University
ID : XNYB18-06
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Al-Shami SA, Rawi CSM, Ahmad AHS, Hamid A, Nor SAM (2011) Influence of agricultural, industrial, and anthropogenic stresses on the distribution and diversity of macroinvertebrates in Juru River Basin, Penang. Malaysia Ecotox Environ Safe 74:1195–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.02.022
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.02.022
Arimoro FO (2009) Impact of rubber effluent discharges on the water quality and macroinvertebrate community assemblages in a forest stream in the Niger Delta. Chemosphere 77:440–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.06.031
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.06.031
Beechie T, Richardson JS, Gurnell AM, Negishi J (2012) Watershed processes, human impacts, and process-based restoration. In: Stream and watershed restoration: a guide to restoring riverine processes and habitats. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118406618.ch2
Beermann AJ, Elbrecht V, Karnatz S, Ma L, Matthaei CD, Piggott JJ, Leese F (2018) Multiple-stressor effects on stream macroinvertebrate communities: a mesocosm experiment manipulating salinity, fine sediment and flow velocity. Sci Total Environ 4:961–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.084
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.084
Bernhardt ES, Sudduth EB, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Meyer JL, Alexander G, Follastad-Shah J, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Lave R, Rumps J, Pagano L (2007) Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of US river restoration practitioners. Restor Ecol 15:482–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00244.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00244.x
Besacier-Monbertrand AL, Paillex A, Castella E (2014) Short-term impacts of lateral hydrological connectivity restoration on aquatic macroinvertebrates. River Res Appl 30(5):557–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2597
doi: 10.1002/rra.2597
Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2018) Numerical ecology with R, second ed. Springer International Publishing, Cham https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71404-2
Brasher AM (2003) Impacts of human disturbances on biotic communities in Hawaiian streams. BioScience 53:1052–1060. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-35682003053[1052:IOHDOB]2.0.CO;2
doi: 10.1641/0006-35682003053[1052:IOHDOB]2.0.CO;2
Cabria MÁ, Barquín J, Juanes JA (2011) Micro distribution patterns of macroinvertebrate communities upstream and downstream of organic effluents. Water Res 45:1501–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.028
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.028
Cai Y, Xu H, Vilmi A, Tolonen KT, Tang X, Qin B, Gong Z, Heino J (2017) Relative roles of spatial processes, natural factors and anthropogenic stressors in structuring a lake macroinvertebrate metacommunity. Sci Total Environ 601–602:1702–1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.264
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.264
Core Team R (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Dewson ZS, James AB, Death RG (2007) A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates. J North Am Benthol Soc 26:401–415. https://doi.org/10.1899/06-110.1
doi: 10.1899/06-110.1
Dos Santos SD, Molineri C, Reynaga M, Basualdo C (2011) Which index is the best to assess stream health? Ecol Indic 11:582–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.08.004
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.08.004
Douglas M, Lake PS (1994) Species richness of stream stones - an investigation of the mechanisms generating the species-area relationship. Oikos 69:387–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545851
doi: 10.2307/3545851
Duan XH, Wang ZY, Xu MZ (2010) Benthic macroinvertebrate and application in the assessment of stream ecology. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China In Chinese
Dudley TL, Cooper SD, Hemphill N (1986) Effects of macroalgae on a stream invertebrate community. J N Am Benthol Soc 52:93–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467864
doi: 10.2307/1467864
Elbrecht V, Beermann AJ, Goessler G, Neumann J, Tollrian R, Wagner R, Wlecklik A, Piggott JJ, Matthaei CD, Leese F (2016) Multiple-stressor effects on stream invertebrates: a mesocosm experiment manipulating nutrients, fine sediment and flow velocity. Freshw Biol 61(4):362–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12713
doi: 10.1111/fwb.12713
Englund G, Maimqvist B, Zhang YX (1997) Using predictive models to estimate effects of flow regulation on net-spinning caddis larvae in North Swedish rivers. Freshw Biol 37:687–697. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00178.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00178.x
Ernst AG, Warren DR, Baldigo BP (2012) Natural-channel-design restorations that changed geomorphology have little effect on macroinvertebrate communities in headwater streams. Restor Ecol 20:532–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00790.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00790.x
Flores L, Giorgi A, Gonzalez JM, Larranaga A, Diez JR, Elosegi A (2017) Effects of wood addition on stream benthic invertebrates differed among seasons at both habitat and reach scales. Ecol Eng 106:116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.036
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.036
Frainer A, Polvi LE, Jansson R, McKie BG (2018) Enhanced ecosystem functioning following stream restoration: the roles of habitat heterogeneity and invertebrate species traits. J Appl Ecol 55(1):377–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12932
Garcia X-F, Schnauder I, Pusch MT (2012) Complex hydromorphology of meanders can support benthic invertebrate diversity in rivers. Hydrobiologia 685:49–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0905-z
doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0905-z
Geist J, Hawkins SJ (2016) Habitat recovery and restoration in aquatic ecosystems: current progress and future challenges. Aquat Conserv-Mar Freshw Ecosyst 26:942–962. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2702
doi: 10.1002/aqc.2702
Guo K, Wu NC, Wang C, Yang DG, He YF, Luo JB, Chai Y, Duan M, Huang X, Riis T (2019) Trait dependent roles of environmental factors, spatial processes and grazing pressure on lake phytoplankton metacommunity. Ecol Indic 103:312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.028
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.028
Heatherly T, Whiles MR, Royer TV, David MB (2007) Relationships between water quality, habitat quality, and macroinvertebrate assemblages in Illinois streams. J Environ Qual 36(6):1653–1660. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0521
doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0521
Hilsenhoff WL (1988) Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family-level biotic index. J N Am Benthol Soc 71:65–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467832
doi: 10.2307/1467832
Ilarri MI, Amorim L, Souza AT, Sousa R (2018) Physical legacy of freshwater bivalves: effects of habitat complexity on the taxonomical and functional diversity of invertebrates. Sci Total Environ 634:1398–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.070
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.070
Jähnig SC, Lorenz AW (2008) Substrate-specific macroinvertebrate diversity patterns following stream restoration. Aquat Sci 703:292–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-008-8042-0
doi: 10.1007/s00027-008-8042-0
Jähnig SC, Brabec K, Buffagni A, Erba S, Lorenz AW, Ofenböck T, Verdonschot PFM, Hering D (2010) A comparative analysis of restoration measures and their effects on hydromorphology and benthic invertebrates in 26 central and southern European rivers. J Appl Ecol 47:671–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01807.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01807.x
Jones JI, Murphy JF, Collins AL, Sear DA, Naden PS, Armitage PD (2012) The impact of fine sediment on macro-invertebrates. River Res Appl 28:1055–1071. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1516
doi: 10.1002/rra.1516
Kail J, Brabec K, Poppe M, Januschke K (2015) The effect of river restoration on fish, macroinvertebrates and aquatic macrophytes: a meta-analysis. Ecol Indic 58:311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.011
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.011
Kail J, McKie B, Verdonschot PFM, Hering D (2016) Preface: Effects of hydromorphological river restoration—a comprehensive field investigation of 20 European projects. Hydrobiologia 769(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2659-0
doi: 10.1007/s10750-016-2659-0
Kalyoncu H, Gülboy H (2009) Benthic macroinvertebrates from dari¨oren and isparta streams Isparta/Turkey-biotic indices and multivariate analysis. J Appl Biol Sci 31:79–86
Kärnä O-M, Heino J, Grönroos M, Hjort J (2018) The added value of geodiversity indices in explaining variation of stream macroinvertebrate diversity. Ecol Indic 94(1):420–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.034
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.034
Karr JR (1999) Defining and measuring river health. Freshw Biol 41:221–234. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00427.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00427.x
Knouft JH, Chu ML (2015) Using watershed-scale hydrological models to predict the impacts of increasing urbanization on freshwater fish assemblages. Ecohydrology 8:273–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1506
doi: 10.1002/eco.1506
Kondolf GM (1997) Application of the pebble count: Notes on purpose, method, and variants. J Am Water Resour Assoc 33:79–87 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb04084.x
Laasonen P, Muotka T, Kivijarvi I (1998) Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration. Aquat Conserv-Mar Freshw Ecosyst 81:101–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/SICI1099-0755199801/028:1/3C101::AID-AQC251/3E3.0.CO;2-4
doi: 10.1002/SICI1099-0755199801/028:1/3C101::AID-AQC251/3E3.0.CO;2-4
Lake PS, Palmer MA, Biro P, Cole J, Covich AP, Dahm C et al (2000) Global change and the biodiversity of freshwater ecosystems. Bioscience 50:1099–1107. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-35682000050[1099:GCATBO]2.0.CO;2
doi: 10.1641/0006-35682000050[1099:GCATBO]2.0.CO;2
Lepori F, Palm D, Brannas E, Malmqvist B (2005) Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecol Appl 15:2060–2071. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1372
doi: 10.1890/04-1372
Li K, He CG, Zhuang J, Zhang ZX, Xiang HY, Wang ZQ, Yang H, Sheng L (2015) Long-term changes in the water quality and macroinvertebrate communities of a subtropical river in south China. Water 7:63–80. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7010063
doi: 10.3390/w7010063
Lin QY, Sekar R, Marrs RH, Zhang YX (2019) Effect of river ecological restoration on biofilm microbial community composition. Water 11:6. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061244
doi: 10.3390/w11061244
Lin QY, Zhang YX, Marrs RH, Sekar R, Luo X, Wu NC (2020) Evaluating ecosystem functioning following river restoration: the role of hydromorphology, bacteria, and macroinvertebrates. Sci Total Environ 743:140583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140583
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140583
Lorenz S, Leszinski M, Graeber D (2016) Meander reconnection method determines restoration success for macroinvertebrate communities in a German lowland river. Int Rev Hydrobiol 101(3–4):123–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201501823
doi: 10.1002/iroh.201501823
Louhi P, Mykrä H, Paavola R, Huusko A, Vehanen T, Mäki-Petäys A, Muotka T (2011) Twenty years of stream restoration in Finland: little response by benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Ecol Appl 21(6):1950–1961. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0591.1
doi: 10.1890/10-0591.1
Luo K, Hu X, He Q, Wu Z, Cheng H, Hu Z, Mazumder A (2017) Impacts of rapid urbanization on the water quality and macroinvertebrate communities of streams: a case study in Liangjiang New Area. China Sci Total Environ 621:1601–1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.068
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.068
Mandaville SM (2002) Bioassessment of freshwaters using benthic macroinvertebrates-a primer. Soil Water Conservation Society of Metro Halifax. Dartmouth, NS, Canada
Martín EJ, Ryo M, Doering M, Robinson CT (2018) Evaluation of restoration and flow interactions on river structure and function: channel widening of the Thur River, Switzerland. Water 10(4):439. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040439
doi: 10.3390/w10040439
Matthaei CD, Diehl S (2005) Large-scale river restoration enhances geomorphological diversity and benthic diversity. Environmental Science.
Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB (2008) An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA
Miller SW, Budy P, Schmidt JC (2010) Quantifying macroinvertebrate responses to in-stream habitat restoration: applications of meta-analysis to river restoration. Restor Ecol 18:8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00605.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00605.x
Obolewski K, Glinskalewczuk K, Ozgo M, Astel A (2016) Connectivity restoration of floodplain lakes: an assessment based on macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 7741:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2530-8
doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2530-8
Palmer MA, Menninger HL, Bernhardt ES (2010) River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshw Biol 55:205–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x
Palmer MA, Hondula KL, Koch BJ (2014) Ecological restoration of streams and rivers: shifting strategies and shifting goals. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:247–269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091935
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091935
Patang F, Soegianto A, Hariyanto S (2018) Benthic macroinvertebrates diversity as bioindicator of water quality of some rivers in east Kalimantan, Indonesia. Hindawi. Int J Ecol 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5129421
Piggott JJ, Townsend CR, Matthaei CD (2015) Climate warming and agricultural stressors interact to determine stream macroinvertebrate community dynamics. Glob Chang Biol 21:1887–1906. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12861
doi: 10.1111/gcb.12861
Plafkin JL, Barbour JL, Porter MT, Gross KD, Hughes RM (1989) Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.
Poff NL (1997) Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. J N Am Benthol Soc 16(2):391–409. https://doi.org/10.2307/1468026
doi: 10.2307/1468026
Rico A, Van den Brink PJ, Leitner P, Graf W, Focks A (2016) Relative influence of chemical and non-chemical stressors on invertebrate communities: a case study in the Danube River. Sci Total Environ 571:1370–1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.087
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.087
Ryan PA (1991) Environmental-effects of sediment on new-Zealand streams - a review N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw Res 25:207–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1991.9516472
doi: 10.1080/00288330.1991.9516472
Schmutz S, Jurajda P, Kaufmann S, Lorenz AW, Muhar S, Paillex A et al (2016) Response of fish assemblages to hydromorphological restorationin central and northern European rivers. Hydrobiologia 769(1):67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107447
doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107447
Shannon CE (1997) The mathematical theory of communication. M D Computing 14:306–317
Shao ML, Xie ZC, Ye L, Cai QH (2006) Monthly change of community structure of zoobenthos in Xiangxi Bay after impoundment of three gorges reservoir. Acta Hydrob Sin 30:64–69. In Chinese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-007-0034-2
doi: 10.1007/s11515-007-0034-2
Shi X, Liu J, You X, Bao K, Meng B (2019) Shared effects of hydromorphological and physico-chemical factors on benthic macroinvertebrate integrity for substrate types. Ecol Indic 105:406–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.028
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.028
Smith M, Kay W, Edward D, Papas P, Richardson KSJ, Simpson J et al (1999) AusRivAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition of rivers in Western Australia. Freshw Biol 41:269–282. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00430.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00430.x
Spänhoff B, Arle J (2007) Setting attainable goals of stream habitat restoration from a macroinvertebrate view. Restor Ecol 15:317–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00216.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00216.x
Strayer DL (2006) Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. J N Am Benthol Soc 25:271–287. https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593200625[271:CFFIC]2.0.CO;2
doi: 10.1899/0887-3593200625[271:CFFIC]2.0.CO;2
Taniguchi H, Tokeshi M (2004) Effects of habitat complexity on benthic assemblages in a variable environment. Freshw Biol 49(9):1164–1178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01257.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01257.x
Torres-Mellado GA, Escobar I, Palfner G, Casanova-Katny MA (2012) Mycotrophy in Gilliesieae, a threatened and poorly known tribe of Alliaceae from central Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat 85:179–186. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2012000200004
doi: 10.4067/S0716-078X2012000200004
Tullos D, Penrose D, Jennings G, Cope W (2009) Analysis of functional traits in reconfigured channels: implications for the bioassessment and disturbance of river restoration. J N Am Benthol Soc 28:80–92. https://doi.org/10.1899/07-122.1
doi: 10.1899/07-122.1
Turley MD, Bilotta GS, Chadd RP, Extence CA, Brazier RE, Burnside NG, Pickwell AGG (2016) A sediment-specific family-level biomonitoring tool to identify the impacts of fine sediment in temperate rivers and streams. Ecol Indic 70:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.040
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.040
Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:130–137. https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017
doi: 10.1139/f80-017
White JC, Krajenbrink HJ, Hill MJ, Hannah DM, House A, Wood PJ (2019) Habitat-specific invertebrate responses to hydrological variability, anthropogenic flow alterations, and hydraulic conditions. Freshw Biol 64:555–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13242
doi: 10.1111/fwb.13242
Zan RB, Kondolf GM, Riostouma B (2017) Evaluating stream restoration project: what do we learn from monitoring? Water 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9030174
Zhang YX, Richardson JS, Negishi JN (2004) Detritus processing, ecosystem engineering, and benthic diversity: a test of predator-omnivore interference. J Anim Ecol 73:756–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00849.x
doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00849.x
Zhang YX, Richardson JS, Pinto X (2009) Catchment-scale effects of forestry practices on benthic invertebrate communities in Pacific coastal stream ecosystems. J Appl Ecol 46:1292–1303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01718.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01718.x
Zhang YX, Dudgeon D, Cheng DS, Thoe W, Fok L, Wang ZY, Lee JHW (2010) Impacts of land use and water quality on macroinvertebrate communities in the Pearl River drainage basin, China. Hydrobiologia 652:71–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0320-x
doi: 10.1007/s10750-010-0320-x
Zhang YX, Juvigny-Khenafou N, Xiang HY, Lin QY, Wu ZJ (2019) Multiple stressors in China’s freshwater ecoregions. In: Sabater S, Elosegi A, Ludwig R (eds). Multiple stress in river ecosystems: status, impacts and prospects for the future. 1st ed. Elsevier, 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811713-2.00011-X