The spectrum of venous anomalies associated with atretic parietal cephaloceles: A literature review.
Atretic cephalocele
Parietal
Venous anomalies
Journal
Surgical neurology international
ISSN: 2229-5097
Titre abrégé: Surg Neurol Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101535836
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
24
12
2020
accepted:
01
06
2021
entrez:
4
8
2021
pubmed:
5
8
2021
medline:
5
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Parietal atretic cephalocele (PAC) is a small, subscalp lesion with underlying extracranial meningeal, neural, and glial tissues. In this paper, we analyze the related literature on the continuum of PAC-associated venous anomalies and report an exemplary case. The PubMed Medline database was searched using the following search algorithm: (Atretic encephalocele) OR (Rudimentary meningocele,) OR (Atypical meningocele) OR (Meningocele manqué) OR (Meningeal heterotopia). Only papers detailing the venous anomalies associated with PACs have been included. A total of 30 papers in our search documented PAC-associated venous abnormalities. The overall number of cases reported was 68 (including our exemplary case). The most frequently identified associated venous anomaly was the presence of a "fenestrated superior sagittal sinus" recorded in 48.5% of cases ( Although benign in nature, PACs are often a marker for the presence of complex and variable cerebral venous malformations, requiring extensive preoperative imaging workup for both the superficial and deep venous systems to obtain an accurate understanding of the anatomy of the venous system and guide surgical planning.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Parietal atretic cephalocele (PAC) is a small, subscalp lesion with underlying extracranial meningeal, neural, and glial tissues. In this paper, we analyze the related literature on the continuum of PAC-associated venous anomalies and report an exemplary case.
METHODS
METHODS
The PubMed Medline database was searched using the following search algorithm: (Atretic encephalocele) OR (Rudimentary meningocele,) OR (Atypical meningocele) OR (Meningocele manqué) OR (Meningeal heterotopia). Only papers detailing the venous anomalies associated with PACs have been included.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 30 papers in our search documented PAC-associated venous abnormalities. The overall number of cases reported was 68 (including our exemplary case). The most frequently identified associated venous anomaly was the presence of a "fenestrated superior sagittal sinus" recorded in 48.5% of cases (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Although benign in nature, PACs are often a marker for the presence of complex and variable cerebral venous malformations, requiring extensive preoperative imaging workup for both the superficial and deep venous systems to obtain an accurate understanding of the anatomy of the venous system and guide surgical planning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34345467
doi: 10.25259/SNI_943_2020
pii: 10.25259/SNI_943_2020
pmc: PMC8326065
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
326Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2021 Surgical Neurology International.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007 Jan;109(1):81-4
pubmed: 16793200
Malays J Med Sci. 2010 Jul;17(3):61-3
pubmed: 22135551
Pediatr Radiol. 2000 Nov;30(11):743-7
pubmed: 11100489
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139(6):585-6
pubmed: 9248596
Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Jul 1;140(13):1458-62
pubmed: 16718686
Cancer. 1974 Sep;34(3):728-44
pubmed: 4851231
Neurology. 1964 Aug;14:764-72
pubmed: 14206568
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018;77(3):591-596
pubmed: 29235085
Childs Nerv Syst. 1996 Sep;12(9):540-50
pubmed: 8906370
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Feb;33(2):363-367
pubmed: 27704246
Clin Anat. 2010 Nov;23(8):877-8
pubmed: 20069640
J Neurosurg. 1988 Oct;69(4):545-51
pubmed: 3418387
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1998 Jun;28(6):326
pubmed: 9782210
JBR-BTR. 2015 Jun 01;98(3):119-120
pubmed: 30394426
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1996 Nov;25(5):260-4
pubmed: 9309791
Clin Neuroradiol. 2013 Mar;23(1):37-40
pubmed: 22173374
Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Jun;45(6):936-40
pubmed: 25359433
Neuroradiology. 1983;25(4):217-23
pubmed: 6633856
Brain Dev. 2012 Apr;34(4):325-8
pubmed: 21741191
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Apr;19(4):791-5
pubmed: 9576676
Eurasian J Med. 2012 Apr;44(1):58-9
pubmed: 25610208
Childs Nerv Syst. 2011 Mar;27(3):345-7
pubmed: 21136064
No Shinkei Geka. 2006 Sep;34(9):945-50
pubmed: 16984030
BMJ Case Rep. 2016 Jun 30;2016:
pubmed: 27365020
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2007 Aug;47(8):351-5
pubmed: 17721050
J Neurosurg. 1992 Aug;77(2):230-5
pubmed: 1625010
J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;192:263-263.e1
pubmed: 28964426
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010 Jul;48(1):82-4
pubmed: 20717519
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Nov;153(11):2275-7
pubmed: 21842442
Childs Nerv Syst. 2009 Mar;25(3):309-15
pubmed: 18839185
Neuroradiol J. 2015 Apr;28(2):217-21
pubmed: 25963151
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2000 Oct;33(4):208-10
pubmed: 11124638
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Mar;141(3):289-90
pubmed: 25590658
Childs Nerv Syst. 2016 Dec;32(12):2327-2337
pubmed: 27461273
Pediatr Ann. 2015 Aug;44(8):312-4
pubmed: 26312588
Med J Armed Forces India. 2013 Jan;69(1):83-5
pubmed: 24532943