Are Positive Psychology Interventions Efficacious in Chronic Pain Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Chronic Pain Meta-Analysis Positive Psychology Randomized Controlled Trials Systematic Review

Journal

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
ISSN: 1526-4637
Titre abrégé: Pain Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100894201

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 01 2022
Historique:
received: 07 05 2021
revised: 25 06 2021
accepted: 03 08 2021
pubmed: 5 8 2021
medline: 25 3 2022
entrez: 4 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although positive psychology interventions (PPIs) are increasingly popular in chronic pain treatment their efficacy is still unclear. The objective is to summarize evidence on the effect of PPIs on pain, physical functioning, and emotional functioning in adults with chronic pain. Four electronic databases and additional references were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1990 and 2020. Findings from included studies were qualitatively and quantitatively synthesized, and study quality was assessed for risk of bias. A random effects meta-analysis model was applied for outcomes with more than four findings. Of 16 included RCTs, almost half delivered PPIs as self-help online interventions, and half conducted guided face-to-face interventions which lasted mostly eight weeks. Results from meta-analysis showed beneficial effects of PPIs compared to the control group on pain intensity and emotional functioning (i.e., less depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, negative affect; more positive affect) post-intervention. At 3-month follow-up, beneficial effects were maintained for depressive symptoms and positive and negative affect, but not for pain catastrophizing. However, the evidence on the long-term efficacy of PPIs and the efficacy of PPIs on physical functioning remains limited. This review supports the notion that PPIs are beneficial to chronic pain treatment, although further, high quality research is needed to support this conclusion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34347095
pii: 6339592
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab247
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

122-136

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Céline Braunwalder (C)

Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Rachel Müller (R)

Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Marija Glisic (M)

Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Christine Fekete (C)

Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH