Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception.
Case management
Emergency service
Frequent users of emergency departments
Staff
Journal
BMC emergency medicine
ISSN: 1471-227X
Titre abrégé: BMC Emerg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 08 2021
04 08 2021
Historique:
received:
17
03
2021
accepted:
05
07
2021
entrez:
5
8
2021
pubmed:
6
8
2021
medline:
23
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Frequent users of emergency departments (FUED) account for a disproportionate number of emergency department (ED) visits and contribute to a wide range of challenges for ED staff. While several research has documented that case management (CM) tailored to FUED leads to a reduction in ED visits and a better quality of life (QoL) among FUED, whether there is added value for ED staff remains to be explored. This study aimed to compare, among staff in two academic EDs in Switzerland (one with and one without CM), the FUED-related knowledge, perceptions of the extent of the FUED issue, FUED-related work challenges and FUEDs' legitimacy to use ED. Mixed methods were employed. First, ED physicians and nurses (N = 253) of the two EDs completed an online survey assessing their knowledge and perceptions of FUEDs. Results between healthcare providers working in an ED with CM to those working in an ED without CM were compared using independent two-sided T-tests. Next, a sample of participants (n = 16) took part in a qualitative assessment via one-to-one interviews (n = 6) or focus groups (n = 10). Both quantitative and qualitative results documented that the FUED-related knowledge, the extent FUED were perceived as an issue and perceived FUEDs' legitimacy to use ED were not different between groups. The level of perceived FUED-related challenges was also similar between groups. Quantitative results showed that nurses with CM experienced more challenges related to FUED. Qualitative exploration revealed that lack of psychiatric staff within the emergency team and lack of communication between ED staff and CM team were some of the explanations behind these counterintuitive findings. Despite promising results on FUEDs' QoL and frequency of ED visits, these preliminary findings suggest that CM may provide limited support to ED staff in its current form. Given the high burden of FUED-related challenges encountered by ED staff, improved communication and FUED-related knowledge transfer between ED staff and the CM team should be prioritized to increase the value of a FUED CM intervention for ED staff.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34348645
doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00481-9
pii: 10.1186/s12873-021-00481-9
pmc: PMC8336392
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
92Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 11;19(1):28
pubmed: 30634955
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:367-93
pubmed: 17716044
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Emerg Med J. 2016 Mar;33(3):230-6
pubmed: 25953837
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;52(2):126-36
pubmed: 18433933
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;24(1):40-52
pubmed: 27473387
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 May;32(5):508-515
pubmed: 27400922
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):4
pubmed: 33413163
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;25(3):420-433
pubmed: 31044484
J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 09;8(3):
pubmed: 30857294
Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):503-513
pubmed: 29188481
BMC Emerg Med. 2015 Oct 09;15:27
pubmed: 26452550
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jan 21;2019:6462472
pubmed: 30800675
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Apr 1;68(4):390-395
pubmed: 27842469
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 20;16(1):594
pubmed: 27765045
Ann Fam Med. 2018 May;16(3):232-239
pubmed: 29760027
J Emerg Nurs. 1996 Jun;22(3):176-83
pubmed: 8949217
Arch Surg. 2012 Feb;147(2):110
pubmed: 22351903
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jan 30;14:19
pubmed: 24479405
Eur J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;24(2):136-141
pubmed: 26267073
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Dec 09;14:146
pubmed: 26645272
Acta Biomed. 2019 Jul 08;90(6-S):34-40
pubmed: 31292413
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1358-70
pubmed: 22168200
Teach Learn Med. 2013;25 Suppl 1:S9-16
pubmed: 24246112
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):63-8
pubmed: 22221292