Exploring men's use of mental health support offered by an Australian Employee Assistance Program (EAP): perspectives from a focus-group study with males working in blue- and white-collar industries.

Employee Assistance Programs Gender Human Resource Management Masculinity Men Mental health Mental illness Men’s health Workplace services

Journal

International journal of mental health systems
ISSN: 1752-4458
Titre abrégé: Int J Ment Health Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101294224

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 09 12 2020
accepted: 11 07 2021
entrez: 5 8 2021
pubmed: 6 8 2021
medline: 6 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Men continue to be overrepresented in the Australian suicide statistics despite wide scale public health initiatives to improve men's mental health literacy and to increase their help-seeking behaviour. Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) deliver free and confidential mental health support; however, their services are underutilised by men. In the absence of contemporary literature that explores end-user experiences of EAPs, we asked men from blue- and white-collar employment settings about the barriers and enablers to using EAP services and explored differences between employment settings. Forty-four men participated in this qualitative study: 32 from one white-collar employer and 12 from one blue-collar employer. Two qualified mental health professionals facilitated five first-round and three second-round focus groups and one interview with white-collar workers, and two focus groups and three interviews with blue-collar workers. Data were thematically analysed using a framework approach. Four of the six main themes were barriers: no need for EAP-alternative supports; uncertainty of EAP services; scepticism and distrust of EAP; and societal and workplace cultures. Elements of enduring barriers to EAP use were contained within sub-themes. These included lack of knowledge about EAPs, issues of trustworthiness and confidentiality, and fear of stigma and career jeopardy. Enablers comprised the need for attractive, reliable messaging and proactive connections and service delivery. Differences within sub-themes for white-collar and blue-collar groups reflected the corporate nature of work and workplace culture for white-collar participants, and workers' communication and practical problem resolution preferences for blue-collar workers. Some elements identified in the barriers to EAP use are more entrenched than were previously estimated and these need to be a priority for action to increase confidence in EAP services by end-users. EAPs that have a visible and proactive presence in the workplace, that tailor their marketing and service delivery to different workgroups, that provide a competitive advantage to its service users, and more confidently conveys independence from its client organisations may help to increase men's interest in accessing EAP support services. Further initiatives that reduce the stigma surrounding mental health and help-seeking both in society and the workplace are needed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Men continue to be overrepresented in the Australian suicide statistics despite wide scale public health initiatives to improve men's mental health literacy and to increase their help-seeking behaviour. Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) deliver free and confidential mental health support; however, their services are underutilised by men. In the absence of contemporary literature that explores end-user experiences of EAPs, we asked men from blue- and white-collar employment settings about the barriers and enablers to using EAP services and explored differences between employment settings.
METHODS METHODS
Forty-four men participated in this qualitative study: 32 from one white-collar employer and 12 from one blue-collar employer. Two qualified mental health professionals facilitated five first-round and three second-round focus groups and one interview with white-collar workers, and two focus groups and three interviews with blue-collar workers. Data were thematically analysed using a framework approach.
RESULTS RESULTS
Four of the six main themes were barriers: no need for EAP-alternative supports; uncertainty of EAP services; scepticism and distrust of EAP; and societal and workplace cultures. Elements of enduring barriers to EAP use were contained within sub-themes. These included lack of knowledge about EAPs, issues of trustworthiness and confidentiality, and fear of stigma and career jeopardy. Enablers comprised the need for attractive, reliable messaging and proactive connections and service delivery. Differences within sub-themes for white-collar and blue-collar groups reflected the corporate nature of work and workplace culture for white-collar participants, and workers' communication and practical problem resolution preferences for blue-collar workers.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Some elements identified in the barriers to EAP use are more entrenched than were previously estimated and these need to be a priority for action to increase confidence in EAP services by end-users. EAPs that have a visible and proactive presence in the workplace, that tailor their marketing and service delivery to different workgroups, that provide a competitive advantage to its service users, and more confidently conveys independence from its client organisations may help to increase men's interest in accessing EAP support services. Further initiatives that reduce the stigma surrounding mental health and help-seeking both in society and the workplace are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34348756
doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00489-5
pii: 10.1186/s13033-021-00489-5
pmc: PMC8334339
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

68

Subventions

Organisme : Acacia Research Institute
ID : CT22469

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

J Couns Psychol. 2013 Jul;60(3):392-406
pubmed: 23668728
J Affect Disord. 2005 Jun;86(2-3):215-24
pubmed: 15935241
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(5):525-35
pubmed: 3353761
J Workplace Behav Health. 2011;26(2):85-96
pubmed: 21966281
Australas Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;12(2):113-7
pubmed: 15715752
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 May;88:1-8
pubmed: 28043011
Mhealth. 2018 Mar 23;4:6
pubmed: 29682510
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007 Nov;81(2):151-7
pubmed: 17492306
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;64(7):456-464
pubmed: 30897957
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 19;9:684
pubmed: 30618865
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 06;16:1
pubmed: 26739960
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2017 Dec;47(6):672-687
pubmed: 28044354
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;203(6):409-16
pubmed: 24297788
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Nov;8(11):4180-96
pubmed: 22163201
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Oct;54(7):1008-1018
pubmed: 29667070
BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):50-2
pubmed: 10617534
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Aug 14;69(32):1049-1057
pubmed: 32790653
Soc Sci Med. 2006 May;62(9):2246-57
pubmed: 16289741
Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jun;75(6):462-470
pubmed: 29563195
J Couns Psychol. 2012 Oct;59(4):591-603
pubmed: 23088685
J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):4-19
pubmed: 29939045
J Prim Health Care. 2009 Dec;1(4):302-10
pubmed: 20690339
Crisis. 2018 May;39(3):175-196
pubmed: 29052431
Alcohol Res Health. 2002;26(1):49-57
pubmed: 12154651
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Aug 1;92(8):618-20
pubmed: 25197149
Health Promot Int. 2015 Mar;30(1):29-37
pubmed: 25256000
Am J Mens Health. 2019 May-Jun;13(3):1557988319857009
pubmed: 31184251
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Dec 30;190(2-3):265-70
pubmed: 21890214
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Nov 30;219(3):525-30
pubmed: 25048756
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Jul 29;14:57
pubmed: 32742305

Auteurs

Lynda R Matthews (LR)

School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia. lynda.matthews@sydney.edu.au.

Jacky Gerald (J)

Acacia Connection EAP, Level 1, 31 Merivale Street, South Brisbane, Qld, 4101, Australia.

Glenda M Jessup (GM)

School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Classifications MeSH