Aesthetic Experience of Representational Art: Liking Is Affected by Audio-Information Naming and Explaining Inaccuracies of Historical Paintings.
aesthetic experience
audio-text
historical inaccuracies
liking
representational art
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
02
10
2020
accepted:
28
06
2021
entrez:
5
8
2021
pubmed:
6
8
2021
medline:
6
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Paintings in museums are often accompanied by additional information, such as titles or audio-texts. Previous research has reported mostly positive effects of additional information on the liking and subjective understanding of a painting. However, some studies have also reported negative effects when additional information introduces inconsistencies between the painting's content and the represented reality. Therefore, the present study examined the negative effects of naming a painting's historical inaccuracies, which are inconsistencies between the content of the painting and the real historic event, and whether these negative effects can be compensated by an explanation for the inaccuracies. The results revealed that liking was lower with inaccuracies named and that this effect was compensated by an explanation for the inaccuracies. No significant effects were observed for subjective understanding and aesthetic emotions. The results corroborate parts of the Vienna integrated model of art perception and have practical implications for the design of audio-texts in museums.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34349694
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.613391
pmc: PMC8326964
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
613391Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Knoos, Glaser and Schwan.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Nov;79(5):701-21
pubmed: 11079236
Phys Life Rev. 2017 Jul;21:80-125
pubmed: 28347673
Emotion. 2005 Mar;5(1):89-102
pubmed: 15755222
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82
pubmed: 15582859
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr;36(2):123-37
pubmed: 23507091
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0131796
pubmed: 26309095
Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):320-9
pubmed: 12934689
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 19;10:182
pubmed: 30837907
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Feb;121(2):176-98
pubmed: 16289075
Br J Psychol. 2004 Nov;95(Pt 4):489-508
pubmed: 15527534
Perception. 2018 Apr;47(4):359-378
pubmed: 29310527
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178899
pubmed: 28582467
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Aug 25;9:464
pubmed: 26379527
Br J Psychol. 2003 Feb;94(Pt 1):99-110
pubmed: 12648392