Existence and Quality of Data on Control Programs for EU Non-regulated Cattle Diseases: Consequences for Estimation and Comparison of the Probability of Freedom From Infection.
animal health data
cattle
control programs
non-regulated diseases
output-based
proof of freedom
Journal
Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
31
03
2021
accepted:
09
06
2021
entrez:
5
8
2021
pubmed:
6
8
2021
medline:
6
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Some European countries have successfully implemented country-specific control programs (CPs) for infectious cattle diseases that are not regulated or are regulated only to a limited extent at the European Union (EU) level. Examples of such diseases include bovine viral diarrhea (BVD), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), and Johne's disease (JD). The CPs vary between countries in the design and quality of collected data as well as methods used to detect infection and estimate prevalence or probability of freedom from infection. Differences in disease status between countries and non-standardized approaches to assess freedom from infection pose a risk for countries with CPs for non-regulated diseases as infected animals may influence the progress of the disease control or eradication program. The implementation of output-based standards allows estimation and comparison of the probability of freedom for non-regulated cattle diseases in European countries. The aim of the current study was to assess the existence and quality of data that could be used for estimating freedom from infection in European countries. The online data collection tool was sent to 32 countries participating in the SOUND control COST Action and was completed by 24 countries. Data on cattle demographics and data from CPs of IBR and BVD exist in more than 50% of the response countries. However, data describing risk factors and CP of JD was reported as existing in <25% of the countries. The overall quality of data in the sections on demographics and CPs of IBR and BVD were evaluated as "good", but risk factors and JD data were mostly evaluated as "fair." Data quality was considered less good mainly due to two quality criteria: accessibility and accuracy. The results of this study show that the quantity and quality of data about cattle populations and CPs are relatively similar in many surveyed countries. The outcome of this work provides an overview of the current situation in the European countries regarding data on EU non-regulated cattle diseases and will further assist in the development and implementation of output-based standards.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34350229
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.689375
pmc: PMC8328145
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
689375Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Rapaliute, van Roon, van Schaik, Santman-Berends, Koleci, Mincu, Gethmann, Conrady, Knific, Hodnik, Berezowski, Carmo, Madouasse, Tarpai, Gerilovych, Malakauskas, Sekovska, Fourichon, Kalaitzakis, Roch, Houe, Dudek, Mõtus, Ózsvári, Costa, Guelbenzu-Gonzalo, Henry, Alishani, Pozzato, Hopp, Juste, Strain, Mandelik, Vilček, Autio, Tamminen and Faverjon.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
CFa was employed by the company Ausvet Europe. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Oct;183:105130
pubmed: 32920493
Prev Vet Med. 2005 Feb;67(2-3):101-8
pubmed: 15737424
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Feb 15;113(3):298-303
pubmed: 24172148
Prev Vet Med. 2007 May 16;79(2-4):98-115
pubmed: 17239459
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Apr 26;8:656336
pubmed: 33981745
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Nov;100(11):9245-9257
pubmed: 28888596
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Jul 1;105(3):195-201
pubmed: 22230658
Prev Vet Med. 2009 Aug 1;90(3-4):254-67
pubmed: 19464742
Prev Vet Med. 2007 May 16;79(2-4):71-97
pubmed: 17224193
Prev Vet Med. 2015 Sep 1;121(1-2):21-9
pubmed: 26036341
Prev Vet Med. 2008 Nov 17;87(3-4):340-57
pubmed: 18649961
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Dec 1;173:104777
pubmed: 31731037
Prev Vet Med. 2008 May 15;84(3-4):291-309
pubmed: 18243373
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Aug 1;105(4):280-6
pubmed: 22305852
J Dairy Sci. 2020 May;103(5):4654-4671
pubmed: 32147269
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Jun 18;14(1):191
pubmed: 29914502
EFSA J. 2019 Jan 21;17(1):e05556
pubmed: 32626101
Vet Rec. 2019 Jun 8;184(23):711
pubmed: 31040217
Prev Vet Med. 2005 Jul 12;69(3-4):285-95
pubmed: 15907575
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Apr 26;6:133
pubmed: 31134213
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Oct;103(10):9446-9463
pubmed: 32747110