Psychological distress among frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
11
06
2021
accepted:
18
07
2021
entrez:
5
8
2021
pubmed:
6
8
2021
medline:
24
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Novel virus outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may increase psychological distress among frontline workers. Psychological distress may lead to reduced performance, reduced employability or even burnout. In the present study, we assessed experienced psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic from a self-determination theory perspective. This mixed-methods study, with repeated measures, used surveys (quantitative data) combined with audio diaries (qualitative data) to assess work-related COVID-19 experiences, psychological need satisfaction and frustration, and psychological distress over time. Forty-six participants (nurses, junior doctors, and consultants) completed 259 surveys and shared 60 audio diaries. Surveys and audio diaries were analysed separately. Quantitative results indicated that perceived psychological distress during COVID-19 was higher than pre-COVID-19 and fluctuated over time. Need frustration, specifically autonomy and competence, was positively associated with psychological distress, while need satisfaction, especially relatedness, was negatively associated with psychological distress. In the qualitative, thematic analysis, we observed that especially organisational logistics (rostering, work-life balance, and internal communication) frustrated autonomy, and unfamiliarity with COVID-19 frustrated competence. Despite many need frustrating experiences, a strong connection with colleagues and patients were important sources of relatedness support (i.e. need satisfaction) that seemed to mitigate psychological distress. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increase of psychological distress among frontline workers. Both need frustration and need satisfaction explained unique variance of psychological distress, but seemed to originate from different sources. Challenging times require healthcare organisations to better support their professionals by tailored formal and informal support. We propose to address both indirect (e.g. organisation) and direct (e.g. colleagues) elements of the clinical and social environment in order to reduce need frustration and enhance need satisfaction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Novel virus outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may increase psychological distress among frontline workers. Psychological distress may lead to reduced performance, reduced employability or even burnout. In the present study, we assessed experienced psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic from a self-determination theory perspective.
METHODS
This mixed-methods study, with repeated measures, used surveys (quantitative data) combined with audio diaries (qualitative data) to assess work-related COVID-19 experiences, psychological need satisfaction and frustration, and psychological distress over time. Forty-six participants (nurses, junior doctors, and consultants) completed 259 surveys and shared 60 audio diaries. Surveys and audio diaries were analysed separately.
RESULTS
Quantitative results indicated that perceived psychological distress during COVID-19 was higher than pre-COVID-19 and fluctuated over time. Need frustration, specifically autonomy and competence, was positively associated with psychological distress, while need satisfaction, especially relatedness, was negatively associated with psychological distress. In the qualitative, thematic analysis, we observed that especially organisational logistics (rostering, work-life balance, and internal communication) frustrated autonomy, and unfamiliarity with COVID-19 frustrated competence. Despite many need frustrating experiences, a strong connection with colleagues and patients were important sources of relatedness support (i.e. need satisfaction) that seemed to mitigate psychological distress.
CONCLUSION
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increase of psychological distress among frontline workers. Both need frustration and need satisfaction explained unique variance of psychological distress, but seemed to originate from different sources. Challenging times require healthcare organisations to better support their professionals by tailored formal and informal support. We propose to address both indirect (e.g. organisation) and direct (e.g. colleagues) elements of the clinical and social environment in order to reduce need frustration and enhance need satisfaction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34351970
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255510
pii: PONE-D-21-19243
pmc: PMC8341539
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0255510Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Mar 05;26:e923549
pubmed: 32132521
J Occup Organ Psychol. 2016 Jun;89(2):396-419
pubmed: 27708502
JAMA. 2020 Apr 21;323(15):1439-1440
pubmed: 32163102
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2020 Oct;8:100144
pubmed: 32959031
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jun;51:102119
pubmed: 32339895
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:901-907
pubmed: 32437915
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Mar;60(3):248-257
pubmed: 29252922
Psychol Med. 1997 Jan;27(1):191-7
pubmed: 9122299
Med Teach. 2011;33(12):961-73
pubmed: 22225433
Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):419-427
pubmed: 33555778
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):e043718
pubmed: 33408212
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0159015
pubmed: 27391946
Acad Med. 2014 Mar;89(3):443-51
pubmed: 24448053
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 9;21(1):104
pubmed: 33422039
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 6;15(8):e0237301
pubmed: 32760131
Dev Psychol. 2017 Feb;53(2):237-251
pubmed: 27736100
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Apr;136:319-333
pubmed: 33636688
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 15;15(12):e0244052
pubmed: 33320910
Am J Med. 2003 Apr 15;114(6):513-9
pubmed: 12727590
Psychol Rev. 1959 Sep;66:297-333
pubmed: 13844397
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11:CD013779
pubmed: 33150970
Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529
pubmed: 7777651
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976
pubmed: 32202646
J Nurs Manag. 2013 May;21(4):638-47
pubmed: 23700980
Med Educ. 2009 Jul;43(7):637-44
pubmed: 19573186
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Apr;30(2):440-450
pubmed: 33098222
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Nov;37(11):1459-73
pubmed: 21700794
BMJ. 2020 May 5;369:m1642
pubmed: 32371466
Med Teach. 2021 Jan;43(1):68-74
pubmed: 33131366