Hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: An experimental in vivo preclinical investigation.

animal experiments bone implant interactions morphometric analysis soft tissue-implant interactions

Journal

Clinical oral implants research
ISSN: 1600-0501
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Implants Res
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9105713

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
revised: 25 05 2021
received: 03 02 2021
accepted: 09 07 2021
pubmed: 6 8 2021
medline: 4 9 2021
entrez: 5 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Evaluate the dimensions and morphology of peri-implant tissues around a modified dental implant designed with tissue level connection and a convergent transmucosal neck, when compared with a conventional bone level implant connected to a cylindrical machined titanium abutment. Eight experimental animals were used for this in vivo investigation, in whom 16 test and 16 control implants were placed following a random allocation sequence. The following histological outcomes at 4 and 12 weeks were evaluated: morphology of peri-implant tissues, the soft tissue height and thickness, the horizontal and vertical bone remodeling, and the bone to implant contact (BIC). In both early (4 weeks) and late (12 weeks) healing times, there were no statistically significant differences between test and control implants, with respect to the overall height and thickness of the peri-implant hard and soft tissues. There was a tendency toward a more coronal free gingival margin (I-FGM) at the buccal aspect of test when compared to control implants (at 4 weeks, difference of 0.97 mm (p = .572) and 0.30 mm (p = 1.000) at 12 weeks). Similarly, there was a tendency toward a more coronal position of the first bone to implant contact (I-B) at the buccal aspect of test as compared to control implants (1.08 mm (p = 0.174) at 4 weeks and 0.83 mm (p = 0.724) at 12 weeks). Hard and soft tissue healing occurred at both implant types with no statistically significant differences. Test implants tended to present a more coronal gingival margin (FGM) and first bone to implant contact (B).

Identifiants

pubmed: 34352137
doi: 10.1111/clr.13812
pmc: PMC9291855
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dental Implants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1127-1141

Subventions

Organisme : University Complutense of Madrid (UCM)
Organisme : Sweden/Martina Dental Implants SpA (Padova, Italy)
Organisme : "Promoting patient safety by a novel combination of imaging technologies for biodegradable magnesium implants, MgSafe" funded by European Training Network within the framework of Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action (MSCA)
ID : 811226

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Oct;23(10):971-3
pubmed: 8915028
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Feb;18(1):1-8
pubmed: 17224016
J Biomed Mater Res. 2000 Sep 5;51(3):529-34
pubmed: 10880098
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Nov;39(11):830-7
pubmed: 22889084
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):342-58
pubmed: 24438506
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jul;24(7):770-80
pubmed: 22458450
Int J Esthet Dent. 2015 Summer;10(2):186-208
pubmed: 25874269
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jan;20(1):56-66
pubmed: 19133333
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Apr;28(2):111-21
pubmed: 18546807
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Sep;32(9):1127-1141
pubmed: 34352137
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Sep 1;24(5):e643-e651
pubmed: 31422410
J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Aug;36(8):705-11
pubmed: 19549213
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 May;41(5):521-9
pubmed: 24829969
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Jun;27(3):251-7
pubmed: 17694948
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1228-36
pubmed: 24673875
Int J Esthet Dent. 2017;12(3):306-323
pubmed: 28717790
J Oral Pathol. 1982 Aug;11(4):318-26
pubmed: 6809919
Periodontol 2000. 2000 Oct;24:127-52
pubmed: 11276865
J Cell Biol. 2009 Feb 23;184(4):481-90
pubmed: 19221195
J Biomed Mater Res. 1992 Apr;26(4):493-515
pubmed: 1601902
J Periodontol. 2009 Apr;80(4):609-17
pubmed: 19335081
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Jul-Aug;16(4):475-85
pubmed: 11515994
J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Aug;43(8):702-9
pubmed: 27120578
J Clin Periodontol. 1994 Mar;21(3):189-93
pubmed: 8157772
J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Feb;39 Suppl 12:6-27
pubmed: 22533944
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29(10):1007-1015
pubmed: 30246409

Auteurs

David Palombo (D)

Section of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Maryam Rahmati (M)

Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Norway.

Fabio Vignoletti (F)

Section of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Javier Sanz-Esporrin (J)

Section of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases) Research Group, Madrid, Spain.

Håvard Jostein Haugen (HJ)

Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Norway.

Mariano Sanz (M)

Section of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases) Research Group, Madrid, Spain.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH