To organise or not to organise? Understanding search strategy preferences using Lego building blocks.
Spatial organisation
embedded cognition
spatial cognition
spatial decisions
Journal
Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
ISSN: 1747-0226
Titre abrégé: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101259775
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
7
8
2021
medline:
29
3
2022
entrez:
6
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Humans routinely organise or reconfigure the environment as part of their everyday activities, such as placing a set of keys in a designated location to reduce the need to remember its location. This type of spatial organisation is widely thought to reduce both the physical and cognitive demands of a task to allow individuals to perform tasks more easily. Although spatial organisation can be a useful strategy when searching for items in the environment, individuals do not always choose to utilise these organisational strategies when carrying out everyday tasks. Across three experiments, we examined individuals' preference for spatial organisation in the context of a real-world search task, and the degree to which individuals engaged in time- and effort-based cost-benefit analysis to inform whether to choose between an organisation-based or non-organisation-based search strategy. We found that individuals' strategy preferences could be explained by the perceived task time associated with each strategy, but not perceived task effort. However, even statistically controlling for relative perceived task time or reported effort, participants showed a strong systematic preference against organisation prior to engaging in the task, and, post-task, a strong preference towards organisation. Implications for understanding individuals' use of spatial organisation are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34353168
doi: 10.1177/17470218211040724
pmc: PMC8958644
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
869-891Références
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):501-517
pubmed: 31448938
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):665-82
pubmed: 20853993
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;20(9):676-688
pubmed: 27542527
Cogn Sci. 2019 Dec;43(12):e12802
pubmed: 31858630
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 22;108(47):19048-53
pubmed: 22065792
Cogn Sci. 2016 Jul;40(5):1080-127
pubmed: 26306555
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102863
pubmed: 31252157
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2000 Dec;6(4):322-35
pubmed: 11218341
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997 Mar;126(1):71-92
pubmed: 9090145
Cogn Sci. 2019 Aug;43(8):e12770
pubmed: 31446657
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203
pubmed: 30734206
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124
pubmed: 28375769
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):1033-1056
pubmed: 29134281
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Feb;79(2):449-458
pubmed: 27826947
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(7):1255-64
pubmed: 26912422
Cogn Sci. 2017 May;41(4):1042-1070
pubmed: 27427463
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e68210
pubmed: 23894295
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):337-349
pubmed: 29477776
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(5):971-92
pubmed: 25404057
Psychol Rev. 2006 Jul;113(3):461-82
pubmed: 16802878
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 19;373(1753):
pubmed: 29967303