Molecular and culture-based assessment of the microbiome in a zebrafish (Danio rerio) housing system during set-up and equilibration.
Aquarium
Culture
Danio rerio
Housing
Microbiome
Microbiota
Recirculating aquaculture system
Zebrafish
Journal
Animal microbiome
ISSN: 2524-4671
Titre abrégé: Anim Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101759457
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Aug 2021
05 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
01
03
2021
accepted:
27
07
2021
entrez:
6
8
2021
pubmed:
7
8
2021
medline:
7
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Zebrafish used in research settings are often housed in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) which rely on the system microbiome, typically enriched in a biofiltration substrate, to remove the harmful ammonia generated by fish via oxidation. Commercial RAS must be allowed to equilibrate following installation, before fish can be introduced. There is little information available regarding the bacterial community structure in commercial zebrafish housing systems, or the time-point at which the system or biofilter reaches a microbiological equilibrium in RAS in general. A zebrafish housing system was monitored at multiple different system sites including tank water in six different tanks, pre- and post-particulate filter water, the fluidized bed biofilter substrate, post-carbon filter water, and water leaving the ultra-violet (UV) disinfection unit and entering the tanks. All of these samples were collected in quadruplicate, from prior to population of the system with zebrafish through 18 weeks post-population, and analyzed using both 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and culture using multiple agars and annotation of isolates via matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Sequencing data were analyzed using traditional methods, network analyses of longitudinal data, and integration of culture and sequence data. The water microbiome, dominated by Cutibacterium and Staphylococcus spp., reached a relatively stable richness and composition by approximately three to four weeks post-population, but continued to evolve in composition throughout the study duration. The microbiomes of the fluidized bed biofilter and water leaving the UV disinfection unit were distinct from water at all other sites. Core taxa detected using molecular methods comprised 36 amplicon sequence variants, 15 of which represented Proteobacteria including multiple members of the families Burkholderiaceae and Sphingomonadaceae. Culture-based screening yielded 36 distinct isolates, and showed moderate agreement with sequencing data. The microbiome of commercial RAS used for research zebrafish reaches a relatively stable state by four weeks post-population and would be expected to be suitable for experimental use following that time-point.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Zebrafish used in research settings are often housed in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) which rely on the system microbiome, typically enriched in a biofiltration substrate, to remove the harmful ammonia generated by fish via oxidation. Commercial RAS must be allowed to equilibrate following installation, before fish can be introduced. There is little information available regarding the bacterial community structure in commercial zebrafish housing systems, or the time-point at which the system or biofilter reaches a microbiological equilibrium in RAS in general.
METHODS
METHODS
A zebrafish housing system was monitored at multiple different system sites including tank water in six different tanks, pre- and post-particulate filter water, the fluidized bed biofilter substrate, post-carbon filter water, and water leaving the ultra-violet (UV) disinfection unit and entering the tanks. All of these samples were collected in quadruplicate, from prior to population of the system with zebrafish through 18 weeks post-population, and analyzed using both 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and culture using multiple agars and annotation of isolates via matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Sequencing data were analyzed using traditional methods, network analyses of longitudinal data, and integration of culture and sequence data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The water microbiome, dominated by Cutibacterium and Staphylococcus spp., reached a relatively stable richness and composition by approximately three to four weeks post-population, but continued to evolve in composition throughout the study duration. The microbiomes of the fluidized bed biofilter and water leaving the UV disinfection unit were distinct from water at all other sites. Core taxa detected using molecular methods comprised 36 amplicon sequence variants, 15 of which represented Proteobacteria including multiple members of the families Burkholderiaceae and Sphingomonadaceae. Culture-based screening yielded 36 distinct isolates, and showed moderate agreement with sequencing data.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The microbiome of commercial RAS used for research zebrafish reaches a relatively stable state by four weeks post-population and would be expected to be suitable for experimental use following that time-point.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34353374
doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00116-1
pii: 10.1186/s42523-021-00116-1
pmc: PMC8340428
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
55Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2019 Aug 27;5(1):22
pubmed: 31482007
Sci Data. 2019 Nov 25;6(1):280
pubmed: 31767854
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 25;10(1):10339
pubmed: 32587370
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Feb;35(2):63-75
pubmed: 24412421
Mo Med. 2013 May-Jun;110(3):201-5
pubmed: 23829102
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
pubmed: 20534432
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jan;64(1):258-64
pubmed: 16349486
Nature. 2015 Dec 24;528(7583):504-9
pubmed: 26610024
Water Environ Res. 2006 Jun;78(6):565-71
pubmed: 16894982
Microorganisms. 2021 Mar 05;9(3):
pubmed: 33808031
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Apr;47(4):1172-80
pubmed: 19144798
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 03;10(4):e1003531
pubmed: 24699258
ISME J. 2016 Jul;10(7):1669-81
pubmed: 26905627
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Dec;67(12):5791-800
pubmed: 11722936
Pediatr Res. 2008 Nov;64(5):470-6
pubmed: 18679162
Ecol Lett. 2017 May;20(5):629-639
pubmed: 28371064
Chem Res Toxicol. 2020 Jan 21;33(1):95-118
pubmed: 31625720
Front Public Health. 2018 Aug 30;6:235
pubmed: 30214898
BMC Biol. 2020 Jun 15;18(1):66
pubmed: 32539727
Front Microbiol. 2014 Aug 06;5:404
pubmed: 25147547
Aquaculture. 2019 Mar 30;503:198-206
pubmed: 30778266
J Biomed Sci. 2016 Jan 28;23:19
pubmed: 26822757
Zebrafish. 2013 Mar;10(1):70-86
pubmed: 23590400
ILAR J. 2020 Oct 19;60(2):270-288
pubmed: 32400880
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2016 Nov;55(6):782-788
pubmed: 27931317
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Water Res. 2015 Jun 1;76:160-70
pubmed: 25813490
Neuroscience. 2020 Mar 1;429:33-45
pubmed: 31931109
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217
pubmed: 23630581
ISME J. 2011 Oct;5(10):1595-608
pubmed: 21472014
Microbiome. 2020 Jun 4;8(1):82
pubmed: 32498714
Mol Ecol. 2012 Jul;21(13):3100-2
pubmed: 22916346
Biomedicines. 2019 Mar 26;7(1):
pubmed: 30917585
Front Robot AI. 2019 May 31;6:38
pubmed: 33501054
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 May 07;11(5):e1004226
pubmed: 25950956
Sci Rep. 2015 Feb 27;5:8605
pubmed: 25721383
BMC Microbiol. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):192
pubmed: 31426738
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jan 12;11:607325
pubmed: 33510727
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;54(6):788-98
pubmed: 26632790
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015 Dec;65(12):4644-4649
pubmed: 26410379
Lab Anim (NY). 2017 Mar 22;46(4):114-122
pubmed: 28328896
Dis Model Mech. 2019 Aug 6;12(8):
pubmed: 31413047
Methods Cell Biol. 2017;138:651-679
pubmed: 28129862
Bioinformatics. 2011 Apr 15;27(8):1159-61
pubmed: 21349862
Zebrafish. 2019 Aug;16(4):388-400
pubmed: 31145047
Int J Med Microbiol. 2018 Dec;308(8):1027-1035
pubmed: 30268774
Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jan;16(1):29-48
pubmed: 23981049
Microbiome. 2018 May 10;6(1):86
pubmed: 29747692
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017 May 1;93(5):
pubmed: 28387799
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 4;10(1):21237
pubmed: 33277548
Sci Rep. 2019 May 8;9(1):7064
pubmed: 31068624
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Feb 21;13(2):e1005404
pubmed: 28222096
J Neurosci Methods. 2020 May 1;337:108637
pubmed: 32081675
BMC Genomics. 2016 Feb 04;17:93
pubmed: 26847793
Nature. 2010 May 20;465(7296):346-9
pubmed: 20485435
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Jul;89(7):1549-1558
pubmed: 32248522
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):867
pubmed: 30696861
ISME J. 2016 Mar;10(3):655-64
pubmed: 26296066
J Bacteriol. 2001 May;183(9):2888-96
pubmed: 11292810
Water Res. 2010 Mar;44(5):1329-34
pubmed: 19945731
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Dec;78(6):1217-27
pubmed: 24773296
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857
pubmed: 31341288
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 12;20(14):
pubmed: 31336824
Zebrafish. 2009 Sep;6(3):269-74
pubmed: 19694524
Lab Anim (NY). 2021 Jan;50(1):19-25
pubmed: 33268901