The prevalence and characteristics of misophonia in Ankara, Turkey: population-based study.
Misophonia
decreased sound tolerance
epidemiology
hyperacusis
tinnitus
Journal
BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Aug 2021
06 Aug 2021
Historique:
entrez:
6
8
2021
pubmed:
7
8
2021
medline:
7
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Misophonia is defined as significant distress (anger, distress or disgust) when exposed to certain sounds that would not affect most people, such as lip smacking or gum chewing. Although misophonia is common, the aetiology, prevalence and effective treatments are largely unknown. Based on our proposed diagnostic criteria, we examined the prevalence of misophonia and its relationship with clinical and demographic variables in a large representative population sample. We used a household sample (N = 541) of all residents aged >15 years, living in 300 homes randomly selected in Ankara city centre, Turkey. All participants were assessed at their homes by trained interviewers, for sociodemographic variables, misophonic sounds and related factors, using a semi-structured interview (the Misophonia Interview Schedule) developed for the current research. The current misophonia diagnosis prevalence was 12.8% (n = 69 of 541), although 427 (78.9%) participants reported at least one sound that was distressing. The mean number of misophonic sounds was 8.6 (s.d. 8.9, range 0-44); the figure was 17.6 in those with misophonia compared with 7.3 in those without misophonia. Of those with misophonia, only 5.8% contacted services for their condition. Predictors of misophonia diagnosis included younger age, family history of misophonia and previous contact with mental health services. Our study showed that misophonia is common in the general population, may cause significant disruption in daily life and is undertreated. Although more evidence is needed to classify misophonia as a psychiatric disorder, our findings support others who claim that the condition belongs to the group of mental disorders.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Misophonia is defined as significant distress (anger, distress or disgust) when exposed to certain sounds that would not affect most people, such as lip smacking or gum chewing. Although misophonia is common, the aetiology, prevalence and effective treatments are largely unknown.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Based on our proposed diagnostic criteria, we examined the prevalence of misophonia and its relationship with clinical and demographic variables in a large representative population sample.
METHOD
METHODS
We used a household sample (N = 541) of all residents aged >15 years, living in 300 homes randomly selected in Ankara city centre, Turkey. All participants were assessed at their homes by trained interviewers, for sociodemographic variables, misophonic sounds and related factors, using a semi-structured interview (the Misophonia Interview Schedule) developed for the current research.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The current misophonia diagnosis prevalence was 12.8% (n = 69 of 541), although 427 (78.9%) participants reported at least one sound that was distressing. The mean number of misophonic sounds was 8.6 (s.d. 8.9, range 0-44); the figure was 17.6 in those with misophonia compared with 7.3 in those without misophonia. Of those with misophonia, only 5.8% contacted services for their condition. Predictors of misophonia diagnosis included younger age, family history of misophonia and previous contact with mental health services.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study showed that misophonia is common in the general population, may cause significant disruption in daily life and is undertreated. Although more evidence is needed to classify misophonia as a psychiatric disorder, our findings support others who claim that the condition belongs to the group of mental disorders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34353403
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.978
pii: S2056472421009789
pmc: PMC8358974
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e144Références
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 May - Jul;73(4-5):219-228
pubmed: 31066600
Psychiatr Q. 2021 Jun;92(2):609-619
pubmed: 32829440
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 25;7:296
pubmed: 23805089
Med Hypotheses. 2017 Jun;103:109-117
pubmed: 28571795
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;129:375-87
pubmed: 25726280
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0231390
pubmed: 32294104
Front Neurosci. 2018 Feb 07;12:36
pubmed: 29467604
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 04;15(7):
pubmed: 29973546
J Clin Psychol. 2014 Oct;70(10):994-1007
pubmed: 24752915
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54706
pubmed: 23372758
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;81:101894
pubmed: 32818687
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 14;8:1975
pubmed: 29184520
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Aug 18;11:2117-23
pubmed: 26316758
J Clin Psychol. 2019 Jul;75(7):1203-1218
pubmed: 30859581
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Mar;74(3):453-479
pubmed: 28561277
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 29;17(15):
pubmed: 32751203
Am J Psychiatry. 1970 Jan;126(7):983-7
pubmed: 5409569
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 1;217:289-294
pubmed: 28441620
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep - Oct;84(5):553-559
pubmed: 28823694