Favorable pleiotropic loci for fiber yield and quality in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 08 2021
05 08 2021
Historique:
received:
25
04
2021
accepted:
26
07
2021
entrez:
6
8
2021
pubmed:
7
8
2021
medline:
7
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is an important economic crop for renewable textile fibers. However, the simultaneous improvement of yield and fiber quality in cotton is difficult as the linkage drag. Compared with breaking the linkage drag, identification of the favorable pleiotropic loci on the genome level by genome-wide association study (GWAS) provides a new way to improve the yield and fiber quality simultaneously. In our study restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) was used to genotype 316 cotton accessions. Eight major traits in three categories including yield, fiber quality and maturation were investigated in nine environments (3 sites × 3 years). 231 SNPs associated with these eight traits (- log
Identifiants
pubmed: 34354212
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95629-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-95629-9
pmc: PMC8342446
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15935Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Nov;15(11):1374-1386
pubmed: 28301713
Nat Genet. 2019 Feb;51(2):224-229
pubmed: 30510239
Genome Biol. 2017 Feb 20;18(1):33
pubmed: 28219438
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 20;6:19444
pubmed: 26787347
Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Jul;115(2):169-78
pubmed: 17492424
Nature. 2008 Mar 27;452(7186):470-2
pubmed: 18368117
Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):773-82
pubmed: 2311921
Nat Genet. 2016 Dec;48(12):1462-1472
pubmed: 27798627
Nat Genet. 2016 Aug;48(8):927-34
pubmed: 27322545
Bioinformatics. 2005 Jan 15;21(2):263-5
pubmed: 15297300
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 04;5:17662
pubmed: 26634818
Brief Bioinform. 2018 Jul 20;19(4):700-712
pubmed: 28158525
Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):904-9
pubmed: 16862161
Nat Genet. 2018 Jun;50(6):796-802
pubmed: 29736014
Genetics. 2001 Jul;158(3):1363-79
pubmed: 11454782
Nature. 2010 Jun 3;465(7298):627-31
pubmed: 20336072
Nat Commun. 2016 Feb 04;7:10527
pubmed: 26841834
BMC Genomics. 2013 Nov 11;14:776
pubmed: 24215677
Plant Physiol. 2007 Dec;145(4):1303-10
pubmed: 18056866
Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Jun;118(6):517-524
pubmed: 28295030
Plant J. 2020 Dec;104(5):1285-1300
pubmed: 32996179
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jan 31;13(1):e1005357
pubmed: 28141824
Plant Biotechnol J. 2015 Feb;13(2):211-21
pubmed: 25213593
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 30;5:14139
pubmed: 26420475
Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 1;26(5):589-95
pubmed: 20080505
Plant Cell Environ. 2017 May;40(5):717-725
pubmed: 28036107
Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Nov 6;95(5):553-64
pubmed: 25439724
Nat Genet. 2010 Nov;42(11):961-7
pubmed: 20972439
Trends Genet. 2013 Feb;29(2):66-73
pubmed: 23140989
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jun;86(11):4132-6
pubmed: 16594050
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Jun;27(6):316-22
pubmed: 22385978
Mol Breed. 2014;33:89-104
pubmed: 24482600
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 27;7:41285
pubmed: 28128280
Gene. 2018 Mar 10;646:28-38
pubmed: 29278771
Cell Rep. 2018 Mar 13;22(11):3021-3031
pubmed: 29539428
Nat Genet. 2010 Apr;42(4):348-54
pubmed: 20208533
Heredity (Edinb). 1993 Aug;71 ( Pt 2):177-84
pubmed: 8376177
Nat Genet. 2018 Jun;50(6):803-813
pubmed: 29736016
Front Plant Sci. 2018 May 30;9:682
pubmed: 29899750
Nat Genet. 2016 Oct;48(10):1233-41
pubmed: 27526320
Heredity (Edinb). 2018 Mar;120(3):208-218
pubmed: 29234158
Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Jan;126(1):275-87
pubmed: 23064252
Nat Genet. 2014 Nov;46(11):1220-6
pubmed: 25305757
Nat Genet. 2011 Dec 04;44(1):32-9
pubmed: 22138690