Early Prediction of COVID-19 Ventilation Requirement and Mortality from Routinely Collected Baseline Chest Radiographs, Laboratory, and Clinical Data with Machine Learning.
CBC
COVID-19
NIV
SMOTE; machine learning
X-rays
mortality
random forest
Journal
Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare
ISSN: 1178-2390
Titre abrégé: J Multidiscip Healthc
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101512691
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
31
05
2021
accepted:
15
07
2021
entrez:
6
8
2021
pubmed:
7
8
2021
medline:
7
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in Wuhan, China, in late 2019 and created a global pandemic that overwhelmed healthcare systems. COVID-19, as of July 3, 2021, yielded 182 million confirmed cases and 3.9 million deaths globally according to the World Health Organization. Several patients who were initially diagnosed with mild or moderate COVID-19 later deteriorated and were reclassified to severe disease type. The aim is to create a predictive model for COVID-19 ventilatory support and mortality early on from baseline (at the time of diagnosis) and routinely collected data of each patient (CXR, CBC, demographics, and patient history). Four common machine learning algorithms, three data balancing techniques, and feature selection are used to build and validate predictive models for COVID-19 mechanical requirement and mortality. Baseline CXR, CBC, demographic, and clinical data were retrospectively collected from April 2, 2020, till June 18, 2020, for 5739 patients with confirmed PCR COVID-19 at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh. However, of those patients, only 1508 and 1513 have met the inclusion criteria for ventilatory support and mortalilty endpoints, respectively. In an independent test set, ventilation requirement predictive model with top 20 features selected with reliefF algorithm from baseline radiological, laboratory, and clinical data using support vector machines and random undersampling technique attained an AUC of 0.87 and a balanced accuracy of 0.81. For mortality endpoint, the top model yielded an AUC of 0.83 and a balanced accuracy of 0.80 using all features with balanced random forest. This indicates that with only routinely collected data our models can predict the outcome with good performance. The predictive ability of combined data consistently outperformed each data set individually for intubation and mortality. For the ventilator support, chest X-ray severity annotations alone performed better than comorbidity, complete blood count, age, or gender with an AUC of 0.85 and balanced accuracy of 0.79. For mortality, comorbidity alone achieved an AUC of 0.80 and a balanced accuracy of 0.72, which is higher than models that use either chest radiograph, laboratory, or demographic features only. The experimental results demonstrate the practicality of the proposed COVID-19 predictive tool for hospital resource planning and patients' prioritization in the current COVID-19 pandemic crisis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in Wuhan, China, in late 2019 and created a global pandemic that overwhelmed healthcare systems. COVID-19, as of July 3, 2021, yielded 182 million confirmed cases and 3.9 million deaths globally according to the World Health Organization. Several patients who were initially diagnosed with mild or moderate COVID-19 later deteriorated and were reclassified to severe disease type.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim is to create a predictive model for COVID-19 ventilatory support and mortality early on from baseline (at the time of diagnosis) and routinely collected data of each patient (CXR, CBC, demographics, and patient history).
METHODS
METHODS
Four common machine learning algorithms, three data balancing techniques, and feature selection are used to build and validate predictive models for COVID-19 mechanical requirement and mortality. Baseline CXR, CBC, demographic, and clinical data were retrospectively collected from April 2, 2020, till June 18, 2020, for 5739 patients with confirmed PCR COVID-19 at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh. However, of those patients, only 1508 and 1513 have met the inclusion criteria for ventilatory support and mortalilty endpoints, respectively.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In an independent test set, ventilation requirement predictive model with top 20 features selected with reliefF algorithm from baseline radiological, laboratory, and clinical data using support vector machines and random undersampling technique attained an AUC of 0.87 and a balanced accuracy of 0.81. For mortality endpoint, the top model yielded an AUC of 0.83 and a balanced accuracy of 0.80 using all features with balanced random forest. This indicates that with only routinely collected data our models can predict the outcome with good performance. The predictive ability of combined data consistently outperformed each data set individually for intubation and mortality. For the ventilator support, chest X-ray severity annotations alone performed better than comorbidity, complete blood count, age, or gender with an AUC of 0.85 and balanced accuracy of 0.79. For mortality, comorbidity alone achieved an AUC of 0.80 and a balanced accuracy of 0.72, which is higher than models that use either chest radiograph, laboratory, or demographic features only.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The experimental results demonstrate the practicality of the proposed COVID-19 predictive tool for hospital resource planning and patients' prioritization in the current COVID-19 pandemic crisis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34354361
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S322431
pii: 322431
pmc: PMC8331117
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2017-2033Informations de copyright
© 2021 Aljouie et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this work.
Références
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jul 14;7:427
pubmed: 32760732
Biol Sex Differ. 2020 Sep 18;11(1):53
pubmed: 32948238
Respir Res. 2020 Jul 22;21(1):194
pubmed: 32698822
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E72-E78
pubmed: 32216717
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720
pubmed: 32109013
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):762-768
pubmed: 32161940
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 10;23(2):e24246
pubmed: 33476281
Invest Radiol. 2020 Jun;55(6):327-331
pubmed: 32118615
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Jul;13(7):920-925
pubmed: 32534945
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Feb;51(2):446-453
pubmed: 33151461
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 21;16(4):e0240200
pubmed: 33882060
BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328
pubmed: 32265220
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 Mar 27;5(1):33
pubmed: 32296069
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Sep 15;20(1):245
pubmed: 32933519
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 01;9(6):
pubmed: 32492874
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):420-422
pubmed: 32085846
Radiol Med. 2020 Aug;125(8):730-737
pubmed: 32519256
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):854-887
pubmed: 32222812
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2020 Jun;43(2):635-640
pubmed: 32524445
J Med Virol. 2020 Oct;92(10):1733-1734
pubmed: 32242950
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2079-2088
pubmed: 32361723
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 27;55(5):
pubmed: 32312864
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Feb;9(3):216
pubmed: 33708843
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2052-2059
pubmed: 32320003
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
Biomed Eng Online. 2020 Aug 12;19(1):63
pubmed: 32787937
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;39(7):1379-1389
pubmed: 32337662
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Sep 24;2(5):e200337
pubmed: 33778628
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 21;7(3):ofaa102
pubmed: 32258207
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020 May 29;130(5):400-406
pubmed: 32356642
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 17;17(16):
pubmed: 32824596
Acta Biomed. 2020 Sep 07;91(3):e2020008
pubmed: 32921706
Cognit Comput. 2021 Apr 21;:1-16
pubmed: 33897907
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Sep 22;:
pubmed: 32963059
Clin Imaging. 2020 Aug;64:35-42
pubmed: 32302927
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Oct;2(10):e516-e525
pubmed: 32984797
Eur Respir J. 2020 Aug 20;56(2):
pubmed: 32616597
Front Public Health. 2021 May 12;9:626697
pubmed: 34055710
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Jul;10(7):1540-1550
pubmed: 32676371
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2022058
pubmed: 32965501
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Apr;21(4):494-500
pubmed: 32100485
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Jul 23;2(4):e200322
pubmed: 33778612
Radiology. 2020 Oct;297(1):E197-E206
pubmed: 32407255
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Nov;59:207-216
pubmed: 33042536
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):106-116
pubmed: 32275978