Imputation strategies for missing baseline neurological assessment covariates after traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 10 04 2021
accepted: 03 06 2021
entrez: 6 8 2021
pubmed: 7 8 2021
medline: 30 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Statistical models for outcome prediction are central to traumatic brain injury research and critical to baseline risk adjustment. Glasgow coma score (GCS) and pupil reactivity are crucial covariates in all such models but may be measured at multiple time points between the time of injury and hospital and are subject to a variable degree of unreliability and/or missingness. Imputation of missing data may be undertaken using full multiple imputation or by simple substitution of measurements from other time points. However, it is unknown which strategy is best or which time points are more predictive. We evaluated the pseudo-R2 of logistic regression models (dichotomous survival) and proportional odds models (Glasgow Outcome Score-extended) using different imputation strategies on the The Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study dataset. Substitution strategies were easy to implement, achieved low levels of missingness (<< 10%) and could outperform multiple imputation without the need for computationally costly calculations and pooling multiple final models. While model performance was sensitive to imputation strategy, this effect was small in absolute terms and clinical relevance. A strategy of using the emergency department discharge assessments and working back in time when these were missing generally performed well. Full multiple imputation had the advantage of preserving time-dependence in the models: the pre-hospital assessments were found to be relatively unreliable predictors of survival or outcome. The predictive performance of later assessments was model-dependent. In conclusion, simple substitution strategies for imputing baseline GCS and pupil response can perform well and may be a simple alternative to full multiple imputation in many cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34358231
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253425
pii: PONE-D-21-11931
pmc: PMC8345855
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0253425

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

BMJ. 2008 Feb 23;336(7641):425-9
pubmed: 18270239
Neurosurgery. 2015 Jan;76(1):67-80
pubmed: 25525693
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Oct;18(10):923-934
pubmed: 31526754
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Jan 1;30(1):17-22
pubmed: 22931390
J Trauma. 1996 Sep;41(3):514-22
pubmed: 8810973
Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 1;35(29):1925-31
pubmed: 24898551
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):985-90
pubmed: 16688059
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 1;46(5):1372-1378
pubmed: 29025122
Lancet Neurol. 2010 May;9(5):543-54
pubmed: 20398861
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Dec 15;30(24):2021-30
pubmed: 23865489
Crit Care. 2011;15(3):R127
pubmed: 21586148
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Dec;16(12):987-1048
pubmed: 29122524

Auteurs

Ari Ercole (A)

Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Centre for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Abhishek Dixit (A)

Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

David W Nelson (DW)

Section for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Shubhayu Bhattacharyay (S)

Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Frederick A Zeiler (FA)

Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Daan Nieboer (D)

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Omar Bouamra (O)

Trauma Audit Research Network, University of Manchester, Salford, United Kingdom.

David K Menon (DK)

Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Andrew I R Maas (AIR)

Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.

Simone A Dijkland (SA)

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Hester F Lingsma (HF)

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Lindsay Wilson (L)

Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.

Fiona Lecky (F)

Centre for Urgent and Emergency Care Research (CURE), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Ewout W Steyerberg (EW)

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH