Disentangling the mediating role of modifying interpretation bias on emotional distress using a novel cognitive bias modification program.
Anxiety
Bias
Cognition
Depression
Prevention
Journal
Journal of anxiety disorders
ISSN: 1873-7897
Titre abrégé: J Anxiety Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8710131
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
01
04
2021
revised:
12
07
2021
accepted:
26
07
2021
pubmed:
7
8
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
6
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Negative interpretation bias is a potential risk factor for emotional disorders. In this study, we tested a clinically inspired 4-session online Cognitive Bias Modification-Interpretation (CBM-I We randomized one hundred and twenty-one volunteer young adults (Mean age = 21.6 years, SD = 3.5; 85 % women) with varying levels of emotional distress to either an experimental or waitlist control group. Mediation analyses were used to disentangle the associations between the intervention, changes in interpretation biases (assessed by both a self-report and an experimental task), and changes in measures of cognitive vulnerability and symptoms of depression and anxiety. The results showed that the CBM-I The study included a non-clinical sample of participants and it did not control for some potential confounding factors (e.g., attentional disorders). Furthermore, participants' engagement during the sessions at home was not supervised. The CBM-I
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Negative interpretation bias is a potential risk factor for emotional disorders. In this study, we tested a clinically inspired 4-session online Cognitive Bias Modification-Interpretation (CBM-I
METHODS
We randomized one hundred and twenty-one volunteer young adults (Mean age = 21.6 years, SD = 3.5; 85 % women) with varying levels of emotional distress to either an experimental or waitlist control group. Mediation analyses were used to disentangle the associations between the intervention, changes in interpretation biases (assessed by both a self-report and an experimental task), and changes in measures of cognitive vulnerability and symptoms of depression and anxiety.
RESULTS
The results showed that the CBM-I
LIMITATIONS
The study included a non-clinical sample of participants and it did not control for some potential confounding factors (e.g., attentional disorders). Furthermore, participants' engagement during the sessions at home was not supervised.
CONCLUSIONS
The CBM-I
Identifiants
pubmed: 34358756
pii: S0887-6185(21)00106-7
doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102459
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03987477']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102459Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.