Comparison of Single-Breed and Multi-Breed Training Populations for Infrared Predictions of Novel Phenotypes in Holstein Cows.

Fourier-transform infrared dual-purpose dairy breed specialized dairy breed validation strategies

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 08 06 2021
revised: 30 06 2021
accepted: 01 07 2021
entrez: 7 8 2021
pubmed: 8 8 2021
medline: 8 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In general, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) predictions are developed using a single-breed population split into a training and a validation set. However, using populations formed of different breeds is an attractive way to design cross-validation scenarios aimed at increasing prediction for difficult-to-measure traits in the dairy industry. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of FTIR prediction using training set combining specialized and dual-purpose dairy breeds to predict different phenotypes divergent in terms of biological meaning, variability, and heritability, such as body condition score (BCS), serum β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), and kappa casein (k-CN) in the major cattle breed, i.e., Holstein-Friesian. Data were obtained from specialized dairy breeds: Holstein (468 cows) and Brown Swiss (657 cows), and dual-purpose breeds: Simmental (157 cows), Alpine Grey (75 cows), and Rendena (104 cows), giving a total of 1461 cows from 41 multi-breed dairy herds. The FTIR prediction model was developed using a gradient boosting machine (GBM), and predictive ability for the target phenotype in Holstein cows was assessed using different cross-validation (CV) strategies: a within-breed scenario using 10-fold cross-validation, for which the Holstein population was randomly split into 10 folds, one for validation and the remaining nine for training (10-fold_HO); an across-breed scenario (BS_HO) where the Brown Swiss cows were used as the training set and the Holstein cows as the validation set; a specialized multi-breed scenario (BS+HO_10-fold), where the entire Brown Swiss and Holstein populations were combined then split into 10 folds, and a multi-breed scenario (Multi-breed), where the training set comprised specialized (Holstein and Brown Swiss) and dual-purpose (Simmental, Alpine Grey, and Rendena) dairy cows, combined with nine folds of the Holstein cows. Lastly a Multi-breed CV2 scenario was implemented, assuming the same number of records as the reference scenario and using the same proportions as the multi-breed. Within-Holstein, FTIR predictions had a predictive ability of 0.63 for BCS, 0.81 for BHB, and 0.80 for k-CN. Using a specific breed (Brown Swiss) as the training set for prediction in the Holstein population reduced the prediction accuracy by 10% for BCS, 7% for BHB, and 11% for k-CN. Notably, the combination of Holstein and Brown Swiss cows in the training set increased the predictive ability of the model by 6%, which was 0.66 for BCS, 0.85 for BHB, and 0.87 for k-CN. Using multiple specialized and dual-purpose animals in the training set outperforms the 10-fold_HO (standard) approach, with an increase in predictive ability of 8% for BCS, 7% for BHB, and 10% for k-CN. When the Multi-breed CV2 was implemented, no improvement was observed. Our findings suggest that FTIR prediction of different phenotypes in the Holstein breed can be improved by including different specialized and dual-purpose breeds in the training population. Our study also shows that predictive ability is enhanced when the size of the training population and the phenotypic variability are increased.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34359121
pii: ani11071993
doi: 10.3390/ani11071993
pmc: PMC8300349
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

J Dairy Sci. 2009 Oct;92(10):5304-13
pubmed: 19762848
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2020 Apr 17;11:39
pubmed: 32322393
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Oct;99(10):8216-8221
pubmed: 27497897
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jan;100(1):129-145
pubmed: 27837976
J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(6):3918-29
pubmed: 24704232
J Dairy Sci. 2016 May;99(5):4056-4070
pubmed: 26947296
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Apr;94(4):1657-67
pubmed: 21426953
Front Neurorobot. 2013 Dec 04;7:21
pubmed: 24409142
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Dec;95(12):7225-35
pubmed: 23040020
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Apr;102(4):3155-3174
pubmed: 30738664
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Feb 19;48:15
pubmed: 26895843
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4872-82
pubmed: 20855022
Front Genet. 2020 Sep 29;11:563393
pubmed: 33133149
BMC Genomics. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):19
pubmed: 33407114
Animal. 2013 Feb;7(2):348-54
pubmed: 23031721
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Dec;101(12):11108-11119
pubmed: 30316608
J Anim Breed Genet. 2017 Feb;134(1):3-13
pubmed: 27917542
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jul;102(7):6288-6295
pubmed: 31056328
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Jul;104(7):8107-8121
pubmed: 33865589
Psychol Methods. 2007 Dec;12(4):399-413
pubmed: 18179351

Auteurs

Lucio Flavio Macedo Mota (LFM)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Sara Pegolo (S)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Toshimi Baba (T)

Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.

Gota Morota (G)

Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Center for Advanced Innovation in Agriculture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.

Francisco Peñagaricano (F)

Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

Giovanni Bittante (G)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Alessio Cecchinato (A)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Classifications MeSH