Post-Traumatic Intraparenchymal Renal Hemorrhages: Correlation between CT and DSA Vascular Findings for Superselective Embolization Procedures.
computed tomography
intraparenchymal
renal hemorrhage
superselective embolization
trauma
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jul 2021
14 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
31
05
2021
revised:
07
07
2021
accepted:
12
07
2021
entrez:
7
8
2021
pubmed:
8
8
2021
medline:
8
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aims to investigate the correlation between computed tomography (CT) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings in patients affected by acute post-traumatic intraparenchymal renal hemorrhages and evaluate their conservative management with superselective embolization. This retrospective multicenter analysis focuses on patients affected by renal bleedings detected by contrast-enhanced CT and treated with superselective endovascular embolization. CT findings were compared to DSA. Embolization procedural data were analyzed and renal function was evaluated before and after the intervention. Twenty-seven patients were retrospectively evaluated in one year. Compared to DSA, CT showed 96.3% diagnostic accuracy in terms of hemorrhage recognition; concerning the type of vascular lesion, there was discrepancy between CT and DSA in five cases. The technical success rate of embolization was 100%, while primary clinical success was 88.9%. The inferior parenchymal third was the most frequent site of renal injury. Microcoils were the most adopted embolics. Renal function did not change significantly before and after embolization. CT has elevated diagnostic accuracy in detecting post-traumatic intraparenchymal renal hemorrhages; in a small percentage, the type of vascular lesion may differ from the findings observed at DSA. In this scenario, superselective embolization presents high clinical success with a low complication rate.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aims to investigate the correlation between computed tomography (CT) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings in patients affected by acute post-traumatic intraparenchymal renal hemorrhages and evaluate their conservative management with superselective embolization.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective multicenter analysis focuses on patients affected by renal bleedings detected by contrast-enhanced CT and treated with superselective endovascular embolization. CT findings were compared to DSA. Embolization procedural data were analyzed and renal function was evaluated before and after the intervention.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-seven patients were retrospectively evaluated in one year. Compared to DSA, CT showed 96.3% diagnostic accuracy in terms of hemorrhage recognition; concerning the type of vascular lesion, there was discrepancy between CT and DSA in five cases. The technical success rate of embolization was 100%, while primary clinical success was 88.9%. The inferior parenchymal third was the most frequent site of renal injury. Microcoils were the most adopted embolics. Renal function did not change significantly before and after embolization.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
CT has elevated diagnostic accuracy in detecting post-traumatic intraparenchymal renal hemorrhages; in a small percentage, the type of vascular lesion may differ from the findings observed at DSA. In this scenario, superselective embolization presents high clinical success with a low complication rate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34359339
pii: diagnostics11071256
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071256
pmc: PMC8305924
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Dec;20(4):230-236
pubmed: 29224654
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar 17;57(3):
pubmed: 33802895
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 13;5:9106
pubmed: 25765607
Front Surg. 2020 Nov 26;7:582261
pubmed: 33324672
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):646-55
pubmed: 18954775
Radiol Med. 2021 Mar;126(3):474-483
pubmed: 32889705
Br J Radiol. 2020 Feb 1;93(1106):20190256
pubmed: 31794248
Radiol Med. 2018 Mar;123(3):236-243
pubmed: 29116602
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Dec;26(6):647-654
pubmed: 31444680
Radiol Med. 2014 Apr;119(4):261-8
pubmed: 24297586
J Int Med Res. 2019 Apr;47(4):1649-1659
pubmed: 30760109
Br J Urol. 1973 Oct;45(5):485-6
pubmed: 4748396
CVIR Endovasc. 2019 Dec 30;2(1):46
pubmed: 32026228
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Dec 2;14:54
pubmed: 31827593
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(40):e8187
pubmed: 28984770
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Mar;136:109540
pubmed: 33476964
Korean J Radiol. 2010 May-Jun;11(3):257-68
pubmed: 20461179
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):1141-1146
pubmed: 28584945
Ir J Med Sci. 2014 Mar;183(1):59-63
pubmed: 23733504
Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 May;45(3):581-92, ix
pubmed: 17601510
J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):42-7
pubmed: 15592022
J Belg Soc Radiol. 2020 Nov 06;104(1):59
pubmed: 33200111
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Feb;214(2):465-471
pubmed: 31714850
Radiol Med. 2019 Feb;124(2):154-162
pubmed: 30368719
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt D):660-664
pubmed: 27856356
Radiographics. 2001 May-Jun;21(3):557-74
pubmed: 11353106
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150952
pubmed: 26882960
Ann Clin Biochem. 2005 Sep;42(Pt 5):321-45
pubmed: 16168188
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Nov;22(11):1563-8
pubmed: 21840226
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Aug;41(8):1565-79
pubmed: 27108132