HE4 in the Diagnostic Approach of Endometrial Cancer in Patients with Postmenopausal Bleeding, the METRODEC Protocol: Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Study.
CA125
HE4
endometrial cancer
human epididymis protein 4
hysteroscopy
postmenopausal bleeding
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jul 2021
15 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
09
06
2021
revised:
08
07
2021
accepted:
14
07
2021
entrez:
7
8
2021
pubmed:
8
8
2021
medline:
8
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Endometrial cancer is the most common pelvic gynecological cancer in France. The most frequent symptom is post-menopausal bleeding and is one of the primary reasons for consultation in gynecological emergencies. The treatment is very codified and consists of a surgical intervention for anatomopathological analysis. The latter is frequently reassuring. These interventions are often performed in mild situations and there is currently no element to be sufficiently reassuring to avoid surgery. This study aims to explore the sensitivity of an innovative marker: Human Epididymis 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis approach of endometrial cancer in case of postmenopausal bleedings. This is a prospective multicenter diagnostic study with three centers involved. Inclusion criteria are any patient with post-menopausal bleeding who is to undergo hysteroscopy, endometrial biopsy, or endometrial resection. In accordance with the recommendations for the management of post-menopausal bleedings, the medical conduct consists of performing a clinical examination, an ultrasound and, in general, even in case of paraclinical examination reassuring, an anatomopathological analysis. This pathological analysis can be obtained in several ways: biopsy, hysteroscopy-curettage (which is the most frequently performed surgery), and hysterectomy. Our protocol consists of taking a blood sample from each woman who will undergo one of the interventions mentioned above. The dosage of HE4 and CA125 requires the withdrawal of an additional heparinized tube during the preoperative assessment usually performed. This research is therefore classified as non-interventional. The primary outcome is to evaluate the sensitivity of the HE4 marker in patients with postmenopausal bleeding in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. The secondary outcomes are other parameters (specificity, VPP, VPN) of HE4, Evaluating the diagnostic capabilities of the CA125 marker alone and associated with HE4, as well as those of the REM and REM-B algorithms. We aim to include 100 patients over a period of one year in three centers. As of now, there is no biological marker used in routine practice in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. The ultimate goal of HE4 in endometrial cancer is to avoid surgery for those who are identified as non-sick. This study is the precursor of others for use in routine practice, HE4 would represent a great help to diagnosis if our study demonstrates it as reliable in the management of these patients and avoid many unnecessary and risky surgeries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Endometrial cancer is the most common pelvic gynecological cancer in France. The most frequent symptom is post-menopausal bleeding and is one of the primary reasons for consultation in gynecological emergencies. The treatment is very codified and consists of a surgical intervention for anatomopathological analysis. The latter is frequently reassuring. These interventions are often performed in mild situations and there is currently no element to be sufficiently reassuring to avoid surgery. This study aims to explore the sensitivity of an innovative marker: Human Epididymis 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis approach of endometrial cancer in case of postmenopausal bleedings.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a prospective multicenter diagnostic study with three centers involved. Inclusion criteria are any patient with post-menopausal bleeding who is to undergo hysteroscopy, endometrial biopsy, or endometrial resection. In accordance with the recommendations for the management of post-menopausal bleedings, the medical conduct consists of performing a clinical examination, an ultrasound and, in general, even in case of paraclinical examination reassuring, an anatomopathological analysis. This pathological analysis can be obtained in several ways: biopsy, hysteroscopy-curettage (which is the most frequently performed surgery), and hysterectomy. Our protocol consists of taking a blood sample from each woman who will undergo one of the interventions mentioned above. The dosage of HE4 and CA125 requires the withdrawal of an additional heparinized tube during the preoperative assessment usually performed. This research is therefore classified as non-interventional. The primary outcome is to evaluate the sensitivity of the HE4 marker in patients with postmenopausal bleeding in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. The secondary outcomes are other parameters (specificity, VPP, VPN) of HE4, Evaluating the diagnostic capabilities of the CA125 marker alone and associated with HE4, as well as those of the REM and REM-B algorithms. We aim to include 100 patients over a period of one year in three centers.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
As of now, there is no biological marker used in routine practice in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. The ultimate goal of HE4 in endometrial cancer is to avoid surgery for those who are identified as non-sick. This study is the precursor of others for use in routine practice, HE4 would represent a great help to diagnosis if our study demonstrates it as reliable in the management of these patients and avoid many unnecessary and risky surgeries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34359357
pii: diagnostics11071274
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071274
pmc: PMC8304032
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Feb;22(2):233-41
pubmed: 23239812
J Ovarian Res. 2019 Mar 27;12(1):28
pubmed: 30917847
Tumour Biol. 2014 Feb;35(2):881-7
pubmed: 24068567
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jan;37(1):58-63
pubmed: 28006994
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016 Dec;16(12):1271-1282
pubmed: 27784171
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1210-1222
pubmed: 30083701
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 25;8(11):
pubmed: 31699959
Clin Chim Acta. 2021 Apr;515:27-36
pubmed: 33388311
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Nov;92(11):1313-22
pubmed: 24032654
Am Fam Physician. 2016 Mar 15;93(6):468-74
pubmed: 26977831
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 May;49(5):474-484
pubmed: 33757921
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Jan;488:215-220
pubmed: 30414437
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jun;50(9):1675-84
pubmed: 24656568
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jul;11(7):XC01-XC05
pubmed: 28893024