Lesion Geometry as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Is Related to Myocardial Ischemia as Determined by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
coronary artery disease
optical coherence tomography
stenosis geometry
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jul 2021
28 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
05
06
2021
revised:
11
07
2021
accepted:
16
07
2021
entrez:
7
8
2021
pubmed:
8
8
2021
medline:
8
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although the relationship between the geometry of coronary stenosis and the presence of myocardial ischemia is well known, the association between stenosis geometry and severity and/or extent of ischemia is still unexplored. Thus, we investigated this relationship using optical coherence tomography (OCT) to assess stenosis parameters and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to determine both extent and severity of ischemia. We analyzed 55 lesions from 51 patients with stable angina. Pre-interventionally, all patients underwent OCT-analysis of stenosis morphology as well as CMR to determine both the extent and severity of myocardial ischemia. Percent area stenosis (%AS) was significantly associated with ischemic burden (r = 0.416, Our data highlight the key role of the geometry of coronary lesions in determining myocardial ischemia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34362126
pii: jcm10153342
doi: 10.3390/jcm10153342
pmc: PMC8348708
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jul;5(4):433-40
pubmed: 22679059
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Jan;104(1):59-70
pubmed: 25124054
Eur Heart J. 2011 May;32(10):1251-9
pubmed: 21273202
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0205984
pubmed: 30356326
J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 May;27(5):222-8
pubmed: 25929298
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Aug 21;13:117
pubmed: 25248966
EJIFCC. 2009 Jan 20;19(4):203-11
pubmed: 27683318
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Sep;107(9):763-771
pubmed: 29654434
Heart. 2013 May;99(10):700-7
pubmed: 23543283
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Mar 20;59(12):1080-9
pubmed: 22421301
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 1;96(3):E238-E247
pubmed: 32012438
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Dec 1;16(1):152
pubmed: 29195505
Circulation. 2009 Oct 6;120(14):1390-400
pubmed: 19770399
Eur Heart J. 2010 Sep;31(18):2209-15
pubmed: 20705696
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Nov 12;19(1):192
pubmed: 33183273
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Mar 20;59(12):1058-72
pubmed: 22421299
Am Heart J. 2013 Dec;166(6):1010-1018.e1
pubmed: 24268215
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 18;9(16):e015593
pubmed: 32805184
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 8;74(14):1741-1755
pubmed: 31582133
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec;29(8):1685-91
pubmed: 23999603
Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2900-7
pubmed: 12771008
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Aug;29(6):1237-47
pubmed: 23558468
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;7(6):593-604
pubmed: 24925328
Cardiol J. 2020;27(3):303-306
pubmed: 32436586
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 1;84(5):700-7
pubmed: 24155115
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Jan 14;6:189
pubmed: 31993441
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 5;381(23):2277-2278
pubmed: 31801003
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 1;40(29):2444-2454
pubmed: 30388261
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2020 Sep-Oct;17(9):1479164120953612
pubmed: 32962403
Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 Mar;103(3):191-201
pubmed: 24264473
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):383-391
pubmed: 31504405
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Sep 24;18(1):122
pubmed: 31551093
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477
pubmed: 31504439
Circ J. 2012;76(9):2218-25
pubmed: 22785153
Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539-42
pubmed: 11815441
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):180-186
pubmed: 30596995
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):250-259
pubmed: 29785878