The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: in support of the BfR position.
Journal
Archives of toxicology
ISSN: 1432-0738
Titre abrégé: Arch Toxicol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0417615
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
12
07
2021
accepted:
21
07
2021
pubmed:
8
8
2021
medline:
8
1
2022
entrez:
7
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability (CSS) asserts that both human health and the environment are presently threatened and that further regulation is necessary. In a recent Guest Editorial, members of the German competent authority for risk assessment, the BfR, raised concerns about the scientific justification for this strategy. The complexity and interdependence of the networks of regulation of chemical substances have ensured that public health and wellbeing in the EU have continuously improved. A continuous process of improvement in consumer protection is clearly desirable but any initiative directed towards this objective must be based on scientific knowledge. It must not confound risk with other factors in determining policy. This conclusion is fully supported in the present Commentary including the request to improve both, data collection and the time-consuming and bureaucratic procedures that delay the publication of regulations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34363510
doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03125-w
pii: 10.1007/s00204-021-03125-w
pmc: PMC8380226
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hazardous Substances
0
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3133-3136Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
European Commission (2019) Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: the European green deal. COM (2019) 640 final, date: 2019–12–11. 52019DC0640—EN—EUR-Lex, European Union
Herzler M, Marx-Stoelting P, Pirow R, Riebeling C, Luch A, Tralau T, Schwerdtle T, Hensel A (2021) The “EU chemical strategy for sustainability” questions regulatory toxicology as we know it: is it all rooted in sound scientific evidence? Arch Toxicol 95:2589–2601
doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03091-3