Identifying Content Themes in Primary Care Physician and Rheumatologist Communications Within Electronic Consultations: A Qualitative Study.
Journal
ACR open rheumatology
ISSN: 2578-5745
Titre abrégé: ACR Open Rheumatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101740025
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
08
07
2021
accepted:
14
07
2021
pubmed:
8
8
2021
medline:
8
8
2021
entrez:
7
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Electronic consultation (eConsult) communications between primary care physicians (PCPs) and rheumatologists may reveal common knowledge gaps and educational opportunities. The aim of our study was to identify content themes in PCP questions and rheumatology recommendations through analysis of eConsult and the need for rheumatology appointments and facilitated urgent visits post-eConsult. A descriptive cross-sectional study involving qualitative and quantitative analysis of rheumatology eConsults in a single center was performed from May 1, 2019, to January 9, 2020. Conventional content analysis was used to derive content themes in PCP questions and rheumatology recommendations. We evaluated the proportion of eConsults, which included a need for rheumatology appointments and expedited visits through frequency counts. Among 120 rheumatology eConsults, six PCP questions and five rheumatology recommendation content themes were identified. The most common PCP question themes were the following: 1) joint pain, 2) suspected rheumatic disease differential, and 3) abnormal laboratory tests. The most common rheumatology recommendation or teaching themes were the following: 1) education on differential diagnoses of rheumatic diseases, 2) education on the specific rheumatic disease, and 3) laboratory test interpretation. The majority of eConsults (82%) recommended a subsequent rheumatology appointment, and 27% facilitated an expedited appointment. In this analysis of eConsults, we identified common knowledge gaps in PCPs and rheumatology educational topics, including differentiating inflammatory from noninflammatory arthritis, using caution in interpreting abnormal laboratory tests without clinical manifestations, managing chronic gout, evaluating elevated creatine phosphokinase levels, and differentiating C-reactive protein (CRP) from high-sensitivity CRP. Timely feedback through eConsult recommendations may allow for focused educational opportunities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34363744
doi: 10.1002/acr2.11317
pmc: PMC8516101
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
715-722Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.
Références
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Mar;22(3):216-22
pubmed: 26281010
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
BMC Rheumatol. 2020 Oct 15;4:54
pubmed: 33073171
Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):45-51
pubmed: 28030423
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Aug;24(7):465-472
pubmed: 28614974
J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Sep;21(6):323-30
pubmed: 25995331
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Oct;68(10):1547-53
pubmed: 26815410
Fam Med. 2019 Jul;51(7):567-573
pubmed: 31287902
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):832-838
pubmed: 32779140
J Rheumatol. 2018 Jan;45(1):137-140
pubmed: 29093155
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Aug;67(8):1158-63
pubmed: 25623810
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Apr;70(4):617-626
pubmed: 29400009