Complications and outcomes of trochleoplasty for patellofemoral instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1000 trochleoplasties.


Journal

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
ISSN: 1877-0568
Titre abrégé: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101494830

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
received: 14 10 2020
revised: 24 11 2020
accepted: 08 12 2020
pubmed: 9 8 2021
medline: 11 3 2022
entrez: 8 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Trochleoplasty is an effective patellar stabilization procedure; however, it is associated with a risk of complications that cannot be ignored. Prior systematic reviews on this topic did not include more recent studies reporting important outcomes, particularly the long-term results of lateral elevation trochleoplasty. This led us to carry out a new meta-analysis of the various trochleoplasty procedures to specify: (1) the recurrence rate of patellofemoral dislocation; (2) the complication rates and; (3) the clinical outcomes. Studies reporting complications and clinical outcomes of trochleoplasty, whether or not it was combined with other procedures for patellofemoral instability, were identified in the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases and by searching the grey literature. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of patellofemoral dislocation while the secondary endpoints were objective patellofemoral instability without dislocation, stiffness, patellofemoral osteoarthritis, subsequent surgeries and various clinical outcome scores. The results were combined in a random-effects model (weighing factor: inverse variance) when the heterogeneity was less than 80%. Twenty-eight studies were included: 5 featured lateral elevation trochleoplasty, 10 about the Dejour deepening trochleoplasty, 12 about the Bereiter deepening trochleoplasty and 1 about the recession wedge trochleoplasty. A total of 1000 trochleoplasty procedures were done in 890 patients who had a follow-up of 1 to 25 years. There were 24 cases of recurrent dislocation (24/994 [2.4%]; this outcome was not reported for 6 trochleoplasties). The Dejour deepening trochleoplasty was the most effective with only 1 recurrence in 349 knees (0.28%). For the other complications, residual patellar instability without dislocation occurred in 82 of 754 knees (8% [95% CI: 3-14%]), patellofemoral osteoarthritis in 117 of 431 knees (27%), stiffness in 59 of 642 knees (7% [95% CI: 3-12%]) and the need for subsequent surgery in 151 of 904 knees (17%). This study found a low recurrence rate for patellofemoral dislocation and residual instability. The incidence of stiffness, patellofemoral osteoarthritis and subsequent surgery remains high but differs greatly between studies. This meta-analysis showed a very large disparity between studies for most complications, which justifies the need for randomized and comparative studies to establish the role of trochleoplasty procedures in the treatment algorithm for patellar instability. IV; systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Trochleoplasty is an effective patellar stabilization procedure; however, it is associated with a risk of complications that cannot be ignored. Prior systematic reviews on this topic did not include more recent studies reporting important outcomes, particularly the long-term results of lateral elevation trochleoplasty. This led us to carry out a new meta-analysis of the various trochleoplasty procedures to specify: (1) the recurrence rate of patellofemoral dislocation; (2) the complication rates and; (3) the clinical outcomes.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Studies reporting complications and clinical outcomes of trochleoplasty, whether or not it was combined with other procedures for patellofemoral instability, were identified in the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases and by searching the grey literature. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of patellofemoral dislocation while the secondary endpoints were objective patellofemoral instability without dislocation, stiffness, patellofemoral osteoarthritis, subsequent surgeries and various clinical outcome scores. The results were combined in a random-effects model (weighing factor: inverse variance) when the heterogeneity was less than 80%.
RESULTS
Twenty-eight studies were included: 5 featured lateral elevation trochleoplasty, 10 about the Dejour deepening trochleoplasty, 12 about the Bereiter deepening trochleoplasty and 1 about the recession wedge trochleoplasty. A total of 1000 trochleoplasty procedures were done in 890 patients who had a follow-up of 1 to 25 years. There were 24 cases of recurrent dislocation (24/994 [2.4%]; this outcome was not reported for 6 trochleoplasties). The Dejour deepening trochleoplasty was the most effective with only 1 recurrence in 349 knees (0.28%). For the other complications, residual patellar instability without dislocation occurred in 82 of 754 knees (8% [95% CI: 3-14%]), patellofemoral osteoarthritis in 117 of 431 knees (27%), stiffness in 59 of 642 knees (7% [95% CI: 3-12%]) and the need for subsequent surgery in 151 of 904 knees (17%).
DISCUSSION
This study found a low recurrence rate for patellofemoral dislocation and residual instability. The incidence of stiffness, patellofemoral osteoarthritis and subsequent surgery remains high but differs greatly between studies. This meta-analysis showed a very large disparity between studies for most complications, which justifies the need for randomized and comparative studies to establish the role of trochleoplasty procedures in the treatment algorithm for patellar instability.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV; systematic review and meta-analysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34365023
pii: S1877-0568(21)00280-2
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103035
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103035

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Jean-Thomas Leclerc (JT)

University Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR 4490, Département Universitaire de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, 59000 Lille, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Roger Salengro, 59000 Lille, France; Département de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada. Electronic address: jean-thomas.leclerc.1@ulaval.ca.

Julien Dartus (J)

University Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR 4490, Département Universitaire de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, 59000 Lille, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Roger Salengro, 59000 Lille, France.

Julien Labreuche (J)

University Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR2694 - METRICS : évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, 59000 Lille, France.

Pierre Martinot (P)

University Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR 4490, Département Universitaire de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, 59000 Lille, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Roger Salengro, 59000 Lille, France.

Romain Galmiche (R)

University Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR 4490, Département Universitaire de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, 59000 Lille, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Roger Salengro, 59000 Lille, France.

Henri Migaud (H)

University Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR 4490, Département Universitaire de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, 59000 Lille, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Roger Salengro, 59000 Lille, France.

Gilles Pasquier (G)

University Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR 4490, Département Universitaire de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, 59000 Lille, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Roger Salengro, 59000 Lille, France.

Sophie Putman (S)

University Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR 4490, Département Universitaire de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, 59000 Lille, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Lille, Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Hôpital Roger Salengro, 59000 Lille, France; University Lille, CHU de Lille, ULR2694 - METRICS : évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, 59000 Lille, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH