Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Reports Fail to Adhere to International Guidelines.

Audit bone mineral density dual X-ray absorptiometry osteoporosis diagnosis osteoporosis management reporting guidelines

Journal

Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
ISSN: 1094-6950
Titre abrégé: J Clin Densitom
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9808212

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 04 09 2020
revised: 11 10 2020
accepted: 12 10 2020
entrez: 9 8 2021
pubmed: 10 8 2021
medline: 29 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bone mineral density, measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is the gold standard for diagnosis of osteoporosis. The utility of DXA relies on the accuracy of scan acquisition, interpretation of data, and the adequacy of reports. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has published guidelines regarding minimum reporting guidelines. This study assessed whether DXA reports for patients receiving care at an academic teaching hospital adhere to these reporting standards, and determine whether differences exist depending on patient factors and the imaging service. Patients aged ≥18 years, receiving care at specialist outpatient clinics between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019, with a DXA report available, were eligible for inclusion. DXA reports were manually reviewed for adherence to ISCD guidelines, with each criterion scored as one point, giving a total score of 14 for baseline DXA scans and 18 for repeat DXA scans. The score was then converted to a percentage. Of 459 DXA scans included, 214 were performed internally at our hospital and 245 performed at 23 external imaging services. Mean (SD) patient age was 60 (16.3) years, and 75.8% were female. The overall median (IQR) report score was 57.1% (42.9, 82.4). ISCD criteria with the lowest scores were recommendation and timing of future DXA scans (included in 1.1% of reports) and investigation for secondary causes of osteoporosis (included in 1.2% of reports). Reports performed internally had significantly higher scores than those performed externally, after adjusting for age, sex, indication, and type of scan (incidence rate ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.77, 1.89). Baseline DXA reports had slightly higher scores than repeat DXA scans, and, among external imaging services, rural services had higher scores than metropolitan services. This study, the largest comprehensive evaluation of DXA reports, highlights significant deficiencies and variation in report standards between imaging services. This has potential implications for osteoporosis diagnosis and management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34366089
pii: S1094-6950(20)30118-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2020.10.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

453-459

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Alicia Jones (A)

Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Endocrinology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Maylyn Goh (M)

Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Fran Milat (F)

Department of Endocrinology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Peter R Ebeling (PR)

Department of Endocrinology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Amanda Vincent (A)

Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Endocrinology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: Amanda.vincent@monash.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH