Securing Your Relationship: Quality of Intimate Relationships During the COVID-19 Pandemic Can Be Predicted by Attachment Style.
COVID-19
attachment style
intimate relationships
machine learning
pair bond
relationship quality
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
30
12
2020
accepted:
28
06
2021
entrez:
9
8
2021
pubmed:
10
8
2021
medline:
10
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic along with the restrictions that were introduced within Europe starting in spring 2020 allows for the identification of predictors for relationship quality during unstable and stressful times. The present study began as strict measures were enforced in response to the rising spread of the COVID-19 virus within Austria, Poland, Spain and Czech Republic. Here, we investigated quality of romantic relationships among 313 participants as movement restrictions were implemented and subsequently phased out cross-nationally. Participants completed self-report questionnaires over a period of 7 weeks, where we predicted relationship quality and change in relationship quality using machine learning models that included a variety of potential predictors related to psychological, demographic and environmental variables. On average, our machine learning models predicted 29% (linear models) and 22% (non-linear models) of the variance with regard to relationship quality. Here, the most important predictors consisted of attachment style (anxious attachment being more influential than avoidant), age, and number of conflicts within the relationship. Interestingly, environmental factors such as the local severity of the pandemic did not exert a measurable influence with respect to predicting relationship quality. As opposed to overall relationship quality, the change in relationship quality during lockdown restrictions could not be predicted accurately by our machine learning models when utilizing our selected features. In conclusion, we demonstrate cross-culturally that attachment security is a major predictor of relationship quality during COVID-19 lockdown restrictions, whereas fear, pathogenic threat, sexual behavior, and the severity of governmental regulations did not significantly influence the accuracy of prediction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34366966
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647956
pmc: PMC8334360
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
647956Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Eder, Nicholson, Stefanczyk, Pieniak, Martínez-Molina, Pešout, Binter, Smela, Scharnowski and Steyrl.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Sex Res. 2017 Mar-Apr;54(3):296-307
pubmed: 27074142
Health Psychol. 2010 Jul;29(4):446-53
pubmed: 20658833
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):19061-19071
pubmed: 32719123
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Feb;13:96-106
pubmed: 28813303
Psychol Sci. 2017 May;28(5):587-598
pubmed: 28485699
J Sex Res. 2005 May;42(2):113-8
pubmed: 16123841
Physica A. 2018 Sep 15;506:97-111
pubmed: 32288105
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Aug;75(2):436-48
pubmed: 9731318
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Oct;32(10):1375-88
pubmed: 16963608
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Nov;31(11):1524-36
pubmed: 16207771
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0247997
pubmed: 33705439
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007 Jun;32(5):565-74
pubmed: 17499441
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238906
pubmed: 32915878
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Jan;64(1):55-64
pubmed: 19228921
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jan;45(1):85-97
pubmed: 25518817
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Jul;194(7):494-501
pubmed: 16840845
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 May;42(4):553-60
pubmed: 23070529
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Oct;30(7):822-831
pubmed: 27077235
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Aug;40(4):741-53
pubmed: 21267644
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Mar;52(3):511-24
pubmed: 3572722
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Oct;71(4):810-32
pubmed: 8888604
Am Psychol. 2000 Jun;55(6):620-5
pubmed: 10892204
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Feb;84(1):113-31
pubmed: 19046399
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul;29(13-14):2047-2049
pubmed: 32281158
J Sex Med. 2015 May;12(5):1107-19
pubmed: 25847589
Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Mar;29(2):105-15
pubmed: 19167139
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Feb;78(2):350-65
pubmed: 10707340
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Aug;109(2):354-68
pubmed: 25559192
J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):190-6
pubmed: 12476266
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec;42:28-46
pubmed: 26295276
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec 1;187(12):2585-2595
pubmed: 30059982
Fam Process. 2002 Fall;41(3):405-34
pubmed: 12395567
Psychol Med. 2020 Jul;50(9):1418-1432
pubmed: 32493520
Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 1;24(3):373-8
pubmed: 23359109
Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;52(4):233-40
pubmed: 17500304