Evaluation of hard and soft tissue changes around implant in partially edentulous patients: a clinico-radiographic study.
Implants
crestal bone loss
peri-implant soft tissue
Journal
The Pan African medical journal
ISSN: 1937-8688
Titre abrégé: Pan Afr Med J
Pays: Uganda
ID NLM: 101517926
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
14
01
2021
accepted:
12
04
2021
entrez:
9
8
2021
pubmed:
10
8
2021
medline:
26
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
implant supported prosthesis has become a viable treatment option for missing teeth. An important tool to detect early changes around implants is the standardized assessment of peri-implant hard and soft tissue parameters. The purpose of this prospective study was to clinically and radiographically assess the soft and hard tissues around implants. ten (10) patients with 13 implant supported prosthesis were included in the study. Clinical parameters plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), peri-implant Probing Depth (PD), gingival margin Level, width of keratinized mucosa (WKM) and implant mobility were measured at loading and at 3 and 6 months. The radiographic crestal bone loss and peri-apical implant radiolucencies were also evaluated at loading and at 3 and 6 months. Student paired t test and correlation and regression analysis was done to evaluate the effect of clinical variables over bone loss. there was decrease in the site specific PI, GI, mSBI and peri-implant PD and an increase in the gingival recession from baseline to 6 months. The WKM remained stable throughout the study. Significant crestal bone loss was observed around implants more on the distal as compared to the mesial aspect. No mobility or peri-apical implant radiolucency was observed. Regression analysis of the confounding variables with bone loss showed no significant effect. the occlusal loading of implants after 6 months showed significant bone loss (<1mm), which was within acceptable limits and the soft tissues around implants were in good health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34367457
doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.378.27870
pii: PAMJ-38-378
pmc: PMC8308875
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
378Informations de copyright
Copyright: Nidhi Mehrotra et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):566-70
pubmed: 19302238
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Dec;18(6):686-98
pubmed: 17991251
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Apr;17(2):165-71
pubmed: 16584412
Periodontol 2000. 1994 Feb;4:58-73
pubmed: 9673194
Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Nov-Dec;19(6):586-92
pubmed: 17165298
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 May;21(5):527-34
pubmed: 20443804
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Apr;19(4):429-31
pubmed: 18266872
Int J Implant Dent. 2015 Dec;1(1):11
pubmed: 27747633
J Periodontol. 2003 Apr;74(4):557-62
pubmed: 12747463
J Oral Implantol. 2009;35(5):232-7
pubmed: 19882819
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):675-81
pubmed: 24818207
J Prosthet Dent. 1988 Jan;59(1):59-63
pubmed: 3422305
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995 Sep;6(3):131-8
pubmed: 7578788
J Periodontol. 2007 Oct;78(10):1878-86
pubmed: 18062110
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Apr;11(2):144-53
pubmed: 11168205
J Oral Implantol. 2004;30(3):134-43
pubmed: 15255390
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Aug;13(4):410-9
pubmed: 12175379
J Periodontol. 2006 Aug;77(8):1410-20
pubmed: 16881810
J Periodontol. 2003 Aug;74(8):1097-103
pubmed: 14514222
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Jan;16(1):89-95
pubmed: 22628970
Periodontol 2000. 1994 Feb;4:81-6
pubmed: 9673196