Does Performing Endoscopy Sooner Have an Impact on Outcomes in Patients With Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage? A Systematic Review.
esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd)
hemostasis
mortality
nonvariceal hemorrhage
urgent upper endoscopy
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
accepted:
01
07
2021
entrez:
9
8
2021
pubmed:
10
8
2021
medline:
10
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background Endoscopy is the cornerstone for the diagnosis and treatment of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Regarding the management of nonvariceal bleeding, the administration of crystalloid solution and proton pump inhibitors before endoscopy is well established, but the optimal timing of endoscopy has been a matter of debate and a subject of many investigational studies. The need for urgent endoscopy arises to provide prompt redress to acute bleeding, decrease the length of stay, and lower mortality from ongoing bleeding. Objective This study aimed to determine if endoscopy performed within 24 hours of presentation improves outcomes in terms of mortality, hospital length of stay, and rebleeding in individuals presenting with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleed with any risk. Methodology We performed a systematic review of two large databases (PubMed and Google Scholar) to incorporate all studies published after 2000. We included studies with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and excluded those reporting variceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Results We reviewed eight studies that qualified after meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria. We divided these studies into three separate groups based on the timing of endoscopy. Only two studies found a difference in mortality that was statistically significant in patients who underwent endoscopy within 24 hours of presentation. One study showed lower mortality in a patient who underwent urgent endoscopy, but it did not reach statistical significance. Other studies did not show any statistical difference in mortality, hospital length of stay, and rebleeding rates. The studies showed conflicting evidence on the amount of blood transfusion, though urgent endoscopy was found to be difficult in few studies due to blood obscuring the lesion. Conclusions While data suggest that there is a potential benefit in performing endoscopy sooner, there is no concrete evidence to point to a particular time range. Before performing endoscopy, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2012) recommends adequate resuscitation with crystalloid solutions, blood transfusions, and antisecretory and prokinetic agent therapy. More investigational studies are needed to formulate a time-sensitive flow sheet to approach endoscopy in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. A strict criterion is also needed to delineate patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. Doing so would provide a systematic approach to help with mortality, rebleeding, and healthcare resource utilization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34367748
doi: 10.7759/cureus.16092
pmc: PMC8330500
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e16092Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021, Tarar et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Gut. 1996 Mar;38(3):316-21
pubmed: 8675081
Endosc Int Open. 2017 May;5(5):E376-E386
pubmed: 28512647
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Apr;90(4):568-73
pubmed: 7717312
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:764153
pubmed: 26101525
Gastroenterology. 2002 Jul;123(1):17-23
pubmed: 12105828
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb 16;11(2):68-83
pubmed: 30788026
Lancet. 1996 Apr 27;347(9009):1138-40
pubmed: 8609747
Cureus. 2020 Mar 19;12(3):e7325
pubmed: 32313766
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;25(3):273-8
pubmed: 17349900
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;16(3):370-377
pubmed: 28634135
Can J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jul;21(7):425-9
pubmed: 17637943
Hepatology. 2017 Jan;65(1):310-335
pubmed: 27786365
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jul;60(1):1-8
pubmed: 15229417
Endoscopy. 2011 Nov;43(11):1018; author reply 1018
pubmed: 22057771
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015 Jul;25(3):415-28
pubmed: 26142028
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jul 07;(7):CD005415
pubmed: 20614440
Lancet. 2000 Oct 14;356(9238):1318-21
pubmed: 11073021
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1132-8
pubmed: 22624808
Gastroenterology. 1992 Jan;102(1):314-6
pubmed: 1727765
Gastrointest Endosc. 1990 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl):S8-13
pubmed: 2242816
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Aug;56(2):174-9
pubmed: 12145593
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jul;84(1):10-7
pubmed: 26944336
Endoscopy. 2012 Aug;44(8):723-30
pubmed: 22752889
Korean J Intern Med. 2016 May;31(3):470-8
pubmed: 27048253
Gut. 2002 Oct;51 Suppl 4:iv1-6
pubmed: 12208839