Defining Unmet Need Following Lenalidomide Refractoriness: Real-World Evidence of Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

Revlimid lenalidomide multiple myeloma real-world data relapsed myeloma survival outcomes

Journal

Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 30 04 2021
accepted: 07 07 2021
entrez: 9 8 2021
pubmed: 10 8 2021
medline: 10 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve with the development of novel therapies and the earlier adoption of continuous treatments into the treatment pathway. Lenalidomide-refractory patients now represent a challenge with inferior progression free survival (PFS) reported to subsequent treatments. We therefore sought to describe the natural history of MM patients following lenalidomide in the real world. This was a retrospective cohort review of patients with relapsed MM who received lenalidomide-based treatments in the U.K. Data were collected for demographics, subsequent therapies, treatment responses, survival outcomes and clinical trial enrollment. 198 patients received lenalidomide-based treatments at a median of 2 prior lines of therapy at a median of 41 months (range 0.5-210) from diagnosis. 114 patients (72% of 158 evaluable) became refractory to lenalidomide. The overall survival (OS) after lenalidomide failure was 14.7 months having received between 0-6 subsequent lines of therapy. Few deep responses were observed with subsequent treatments and the PFS to each further line was < 7 months. There was a steep reduction in numbers of patients able to receive further treatment, with an associated increase in number of deaths. The OS of patients progressing on lenalidomide who did not enter a clinical trial incorporating novel agents was very poor (8.8 months versus 30 months, p 0.0002), although the trials group were a biologically fitter group. These data demonstrate the poor outcomes of patients failing lenalidomide-based treatments in the real world, the highlight need for more effective treatments.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve with the development of novel therapies and the earlier adoption of continuous treatments into the treatment pathway. Lenalidomide-refractory patients now represent a challenge with inferior progression free survival (PFS) reported to subsequent treatments. We therefore sought to describe the natural history of MM patients following lenalidomide in the real world.
METHODS METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort review of patients with relapsed MM who received lenalidomide-based treatments in the U.K. Data were collected for demographics, subsequent therapies, treatment responses, survival outcomes and clinical trial enrollment.
RESULTS RESULTS
198 patients received lenalidomide-based treatments at a median of 2 prior lines of therapy at a median of 41 months (range 0.5-210) from diagnosis. 114 patients (72% of 158 evaluable) became refractory to lenalidomide. The overall survival (OS) after lenalidomide failure was 14.7 months having received between 0-6 subsequent lines of therapy. Few deep responses were observed with subsequent treatments and the PFS to each further line was < 7 months. There was a steep reduction in numbers of patients able to receive further treatment, with an associated increase in number of deaths. The OS of patients progressing on lenalidomide who did not enter a clinical trial incorporating novel agents was very poor (8.8 months versus 30 months, p 0.0002), although the trials group were a biologically fitter group.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
These data demonstrate the poor outcomes of patients failing lenalidomide-based treatments in the real world, the highlight need for more effective treatments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34367987
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.703233
pmc: PMC8335564
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

703233

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S001883/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Lecat, Taube, Wilson, Carmichael, Parrish, Wallis, Kyriakou, Lee, Mahmood, Papanikolaou, Rabin, Sive, Wechalekar, Yong, Cook and Popat.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Blood Cancer J. 2018 Nov 9;8(11):109
pubmed: 30413684
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):57-73
pubmed: 30559051
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):754-66
pubmed: 27557302
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):728-734
pubmed: 29341834
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 10;35(29):3279-3289
pubmed: 28742454
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1621-34
pubmed: 27119237
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):27-38
pubmed: 26671818
Blood Cancer J. 2020 Sep 4;10(9):91
pubmed: 32887873
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):e328-e346
pubmed: 27511158
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):519-527
pubmed: 28017406
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 6;375(14):1319-1331
pubmed: 27705267
Lancet. 2020 Jul 18;396(10245):186-197
pubmed: 32682484
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jun;20(6):781-794
pubmed: 31097405
Leukemia. 2012 Jan;26(1):149-57
pubmed: 21799510
J Hematol Oncol. 2020 Sep 17;13(1):125
pubmed: 32943087
Oncologist. 2016 Nov;21(11):1355-1361
pubmed: 27486203
Expert Rev Hematol. 2016 Jul;9(7):707-17
pubmed: 27291638
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 1;39(22):2430-2442
pubmed: 34111952
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):674-678
pubmed: 32053307
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):906-17
pubmed: 25184863
Br J Haematol. 2007 May;137(3):268-9
pubmed: 17408469
Lancet. 2019 Dec 7;394(10214):2096-2107
pubmed: 31735560
Br J Haematol. 2016 Oct;175(2):252-264
pubmed: 27411022
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 13;373(7):621-31
pubmed: 26035255
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 Sep;17(9):575-583.e2
pubmed: 28886839
Leukemia. 2017 Nov;31(11):2443-2448
pubmed: 28620163
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1811-1822
pubmed: 30403938
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 8;372(2):142-52
pubmed: 25482145

Auteurs

Catherine S Y Lecat (CSY)

Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Haematology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.

Jessica B Taube (JB)

Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

William Wilson (W)

Department of Oncology, Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Jonathan Carmichael (J)

Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Department of Oncology, The National Institute for Health Research Leeds In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative (NIHR Leeds MIC), Leeds, United Kingdom.

Christopher Parrish (C)

Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Gabriel Wallis (G)

Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Charalampia Kyriakou (C)

Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Lydia Lee (L)

Department of Haematology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.

Shameem Mahmood (S)

Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Xenofon Papanikolaou (X)

Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Neil K Rabin (NK)

Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Jonathan Sive (J)

Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Ashutosh D Wechalekar (AD)

Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Kwee Yong (K)

Department of Haematology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.

Gordon Cook (G)

Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Department of Oncology, The National Institute for Health Research Leeds In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative (NIHR Leeds MIC), Leeds, United Kingdom.

Rakesh Popat (R)

Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH