Comparative Bone Graft Evaluation for Dental Implant Success: An Evidence-Based Review.


Journal

Journal of long-term effects of medical implants
ISSN: 1940-4379
Titre abrégé: J Long Term Eff Med Implants
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9110830

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
entrez: 9 8 2021
pubmed: 10 8 2021
medline: 29 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In this review, we provide a comparative evaluation of different bone grafts for dental implants success. We performed a literature review to analyze dental implant success and survival rates after the use of various grafts for bone augmentation. A total of 41 studies were selected and analyzed based on parameters including study design, number of implants placed, total number of participants, type of graft used, site from which graft was obtained, time elapsed between bone augmentation and implant placement, implant survival, and success rates. Results indicate that after a follow-up period of 1-5 yr, respective success and survival rates are as follows: block grafts, 91.5% and 75%; blood derivatives, 91.5% and 96.7%; composite grafts, 80.9% and 94.2%; xenografts and particulate grafts, 100% for both success and survival. After evaluating the available studies, we can report that autologous block grafts, composite grafts, and blood derivatives were the most commonly used grafting materials for bone augmentation before placing dental implants. Xenografts and particulate grafts had 100% success and survival rates, but more studies are needed to assess the impact of these grafting materials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34369720
pii: 2e9c82654bf28eec,6db74f680e57ac8f
doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2021038292
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dental Implants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

33-44

Auteurs

Sakshi Goyal (S)

Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, UCSF School of Dentistry, Fremont, California.

Mina Masood (M)

Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, UCSF School of Dentistry, Fremont, California.

Curtis Le (C)

Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, UCSF School of Dentistry, Fremont, California.

Yoga Rajendran (Y)

Orofacial Sciences, UCSF School of Dentistry, Fremont, California.

Samir Nanjapa (S)

Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, UCSF School of Dentistry, Fremont, California.

Ram Vaderhobli (R)

Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, UCSF School of Dentistry, Fremont, California.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH