Detection of Leptomeningeal Disease Using Cell-Free DNA From Cerebrospinal Fluid.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 08 2021
02 08 2021
Historique:
entrez:
9
8
2021
pubmed:
10
8
2021
medline:
11
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of cancer that is frequently underdiagnosed owing to the low sensitivity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytologic assessment, the current benchmark diagnostic method. Improving diagnostic sensitivity may lead to improved treatment decisions. To assess whether cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis of CSF may be used to diagnose LMD more accurately than cytologic analysis. This diagnostic study conducted in a neuro-oncology clinic at 2 large, tertiary medical centers assessed the use of genomic sequencing of CSF samples obtained from 30 patients with suspected or confirmed LMD from 2015 through 2018 to identify tumor-derived cfDNA. From the same CSF samples, cytologic analyses were conducted, and the results of the 2 tests were compared. This study consisted of 2 patient populations: 22 patients with cytologically confirmed LMD without parenchymal tumors abutting their CSF and 8 patients with parenchymal brain metastases with no evidence of LMD. Patients were considered positive for the presence of LMD if previous CSF cytologic analysis was positive for malignant cells. The analysis was conducted from 2015 to 2018. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of cfDNA analysis, defined as the number of tests that resulted in correct diagnoses out of the total number of tests assayed. Hypotheses were formed before data collection. In total, 30 patients (23 women [77%]; median age, 51 years [range, 28-81 years]), primarily presenting with metastatic solid malignant neoplasms, participated in this study. For 48 follow-up samples from patients previously diagnosed via cytologic analysis as having LMD with no parenchymal tumor abutting CSF, cfDNA findings were accurate in the assessment of LMD in 45 samples (94%; 95% CI, 83%-99%), whereas cytologic analysis was accurate in 36 samples (75%; 95% CI, 60%-86%), a significant difference (P = .02). Of 43 LMD-positive samples, CSF cfDNA analysis was sensitive to LMD in 40 samples (93%; 95% CI, 81%-99%), and cytologic analysis was sensitive to LMD in 31 samples (72%; 95% CI, 56%-85%), a significant difference (P = .02). For 3 patients with parenchymal brain metastases abutting the CSF and no suspicion of LMD, cytologic findings were negative for LMD in all 3 patients, whereas cfDNA findings were positive in all 3 patients. This diagnostic study found improved sensitivity and accuracy of cfDNA CSF testing vs cytologic assessment for diagnosing LMD with the exception of parenchymal tumors abutting CSF, suggesting improved ability to diagnosis LMD. Consideration of incorporating CSF cfDNA analysis into clinical care is warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34369989
pii: 2782833
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20040
pmc: PMC8353541
doi:
Substances chimiques
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2120040Références
Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 10;6:8839
pubmed: 26554728
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Dec;34(13):1283-8
pubmed: 25066782
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 6;8(1):1324
pubmed: 29109393
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;10(8):472-84
pubmed: 23836314
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 19;6:33519
pubmed: 27641744
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):12950-5
pubmed: 19651600
J Neurooncol. 1998 May;37(3):271-84
pubmed: 9524085
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jan 20;112(2):352-6
pubmed: 25490524
Clin Chem. 2015 Jan;61(1):112-23
pubmed: 25388429
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2404-15
pubmed: 27161972
Nat Med. 2019 Dec;25(12):1928-1937
pubmed: 31768066
EMBO Mol Med. 2018 Dec;10(12):
pubmed: 30401727
Fluids Barriers CNS. 2011 Mar 03;8(1):14
pubmed: 21371327
Cancer Discov. 2016 May;6(5):479-91
pubmed: 26969689
Cancer Treat Rev. 1999 Apr;25(2):103-19
pubmed: 10395835
J Neurol. 1999 Sep;246(9):810-4
pubmed: 10525979
Cancer. 1982 Feb 15;49(4):759-72
pubmed: 6895713
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1280-1284
pubmed: 32483359
Cancer. 1998 Feb 15;82(4):733-9
pubmed: 9477107
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
J Mol Diagn. 2009 May;11(3):182-5
pubmed: 19324991
Cell. 2016 Jan 14;164(1-2):57-68
pubmed: 26771485
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 4;112(31):9704-9
pubmed: 26195750
Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7741):654-658
pubmed: 30675060
Cancer Sci. 2009 Feb;100(2):303-9
pubmed: 19200259
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Neurology. 1979 Oct;29(10):1369-75
pubmed: 573381
Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Aug;13(8):1136-44
pubmed: 16865589
J Neurooncol. 2016 May;128(1):93-100
pubmed: 26961773