Graphene and Iron Reinforced Polymer Composite Electromagnetic Shielding Applications: A Review.
composite materials
computational materials design
electromagnetic inference
graphene
iron
materials
materials design
polymer
review
shielding effectiveness
Journal
Polymers
ISSN: 2073-4360
Titre abrégé: Polymers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Aug 2021
03 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
31
05
2021
revised:
23
06
2021
accepted:
23
06
2021
entrez:
10
8
2021
pubmed:
11
8
2021
medline:
11
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With advancements in the automated industry, electromagnetic inferences (EMI) have been increasing over time, causing major distress among the end-users and affecting electronic appliances. The issue is not new and major work has been done, but unfortunately, the issue has not been fully eliminated. Therefore, this review intends to evaluate the previous carried-out studies on electromagnetic shielding materials with the combination of Graphene@Iron, Graphene@Polymer, Iron@Polymer and Graphene@Iron@Polymer composites in X-band frequency range and above to deal with EMI. VOSviewer was also used to perform the keyword analysis which shows how the studies are interconnected. Based on the carried-out review it was observed that the most preferable materials to deal with EMI are polymer-based composites which showed remarkable results. It is because the polymers are flexible and provide better bonding with other materials. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polyaniline (PANI), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) are effective in the X-band frequency range, and PDMS, epoxy, PVDF and PANI provide good shielding effectiveness above the X-band frequency range. However, still, many new combinations need to be examined as mostly the shielding effectiveness was achieved within the X-band frequency range where much work is required in the higher frequency range.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34372183
pii: polym13152580
doi: 10.3390/polym13152580
pmc: PMC8347896
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019 Aug 25;9(9):
pubmed: 31450701
Nanoscale. 2018 Jul 19;10(28):13426-13431
pubmed: 29972177
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020 Aug 12;12(32):36568-36577
pubmed: 32686398
Nanoscale. 2019 Jul 28;11(28):13587-13599
pubmed: 31290898
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011 May;105(3):223-46
pubmed: 20674588
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017 Jun 7;9(22):19202-19214
pubmed: 28520409
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017 Apr 26;9(16):14171-14179
pubmed: 28374986
Nanotechnology. 2009 Oct 14;20(41):415702
pubmed: 19755727
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014 Jul 9;6(13):10667-78
pubmed: 24921939
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Mar 17;10(3):
pubmed: 32192158
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017 Nov 15;506:217-226
pubmed: 28735195
Soft Matter. 2020 Jul 22;16(28):6643-6653
pubmed: 32618326
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019 Apr 16;9(4):
pubmed: 30995813
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018 Nov 28;10(47):40789-40799
pubmed: 30383960
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;31(8):602-5
pubmed: 24053963
Science. 2016 Sep 9;353(6304):1137-40
pubmed: 27609888
Toxicology. 2008 Apr 18;246(2-3):248-50
pubmed: 18453044
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020 Jun 10;12(23):26485-26495
pubmed: 32432452
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020 May 13;12(19):22088-22098
pubmed: 32298079
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018 Sep 12;10(36):30752-30761
pubmed: 30124039
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015 Jul 28;17(28):18353-63
pubmed: 26105548