Racial differences in survival and response to therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A secondary analysis of CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance A151931).
clinical trial
colorectal neoplasms
continental population groups
health care disparities
Journal
Cancer
ISSN: 1097-0142
Titre abrégé: Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374236
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 10 2021
15 10 2021
Historique:
received:
21
01
2021
accepted:
27
02
2021
pubmed:
11
8
2021
medline:
11
3
2022
entrez:
10
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between self-identified race and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response to therapy among patients enrolled in the randomized Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial. Patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer who were enrolled in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial were identified by race. On the basis of covariates (treatment arm, KRAS status, sex, age, and body mass index), each Black patient was exact matched with a White patient. The association between race and OS and PFS was examined using a marginal Cox proportional hazard model for matched pairs. The interaction between KRAS status and race was tested in the model. The association between race and response to therapy and adverse events were examined using a marginal logistic regression model. In total, 392 patients were matched and included in the final data set. No difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.16), PFS (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.78-1.20), or response to therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65-1.52) was observed between Black and White patients. Patients with KRAS mutant status (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.67), a performance statusscore of 1 (reference, a performance status of 0; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.88), or ≥3 metastatic sites (reference, 1 metastatic site; HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.22-2.28) experienced worse OS. Black patients experienced lower rates and risk of grade ≥3 fatigue (6.6% vs 13.3%; OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.91) but were equally likely to be treated with a dose reduction (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.72-1.65). No difference in OS, PFS, or response to therapy was observed between Black patients and White patients in an equal treatment setting of the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized controlled trial. Despite improvements in screening and treatment, studies have demonstrated worse outcomes in Black patients with colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in cancer-specific outcomes among Black and White patients receiving equivalent treatment on the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized clinical trial. In this study, there was no difference in overall survival, progression-free survival, or response to therapy between Black and White patients treated on a clinical trial. These findings suggest that access to care and differences in treatment may be responsible for racial disparities in colorectal cancer.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between self-identified race and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response to therapy among patients enrolled in the randomized Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial.
METHODS
Patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer who were enrolled in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial were identified by race. On the basis of covariates (treatment arm, KRAS status, sex, age, and body mass index), each Black patient was exact matched with a White patient. The association between race and OS and PFS was examined using a marginal Cox proportional hazard model for matched pairs. The interaction between KRAS status and race was tested in the model. The association between race and response to therapy and adverse events were examined using a marginal logistic regression model.
RESULTS
In total, 392 patients were matched and included in the final data set. No difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.16), PFS (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.78-1.20), or response to therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65-1.52) was observed between Black and White patients. Patients with KRAS mutant status (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.67), a performance statusscore of 1 (reference, a performance status of 0; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.88), or ≥3 metastatic sites (reference, 1 metastatic site; HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.22-2.28) experienced worse OS. Black patients experienced lower rates and risk of grade ≥3 fatigue (6.6% vs 13.3%; OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.91) but were equally likely to be treated with a dose reduction (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.72-1.65).
CONCLUSIONS
No difference in OS, PFS, or response to therapy was observed between Black patients and White patients in an equal treatment setting of the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized controlled trial.
LAY SUMMARY
Despite improvements in screening and treatment, studies have demonstrated worse outcomes in Black patients with colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in cancer-specific outcomes among Black and White patients receiving equivalent treatment on the CALGB/SWOG 80405 randomized clinical trial. In this study, there was no difference in overall survival, progression-free survival, or response to therapy between Black and White patients treated on a clinical trial. These findings suggest that access to care and differences in treatment may be responsible for racial disparities in colorectal cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34374082
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33649
pmc: PMC8478698
mid: NIHMS1700072
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3801-3808Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10CA180888
Pays : United States
Organisme : Sanofi
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233329
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10CA180821
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA189974
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1CA233329
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180821
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1CA180830
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10CA180882
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA232760
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA189823
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1CA232760
Pays : United States
Organisme : Myriad
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180888
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1CA233331
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA140158
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180861
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233331
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1CA189823
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA180830
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1CA233327
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233373
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180882
Pays : United States
Organisme : Bristol-Myers Squibb
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233338
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA196171
Pays : United States
Organisme : Pfizer
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016058
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233327
Pays : United States
Organisme : Genentech
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1CA233373
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 American Cancer Society.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4109-15
pubmed: 19636001
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jul;51(11):1405-14
pubmed: 25979833
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1876-1885
pubmed: 31042420
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34
pubmed: 18316791
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 1;30(4):401-5
pubmed: 22184373
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;20(11):3033-43
pubmed: 24687927
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 May 6;67(3):177-193
pubmed: 28248415
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 10;37(14):1217-1227
pubmed: 30865548
Br J Cancer. 2017 Mar 28;116(7):923-929
pubmed: 28208157
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(13):1704-13
pubmed: 26049686
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 20;28(3):466-74
pubmed: 20008640
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 15;18(2):350-9
pubmed: 22114137
Ann Epidemiol. 2004 Mar;14(3):215-21
pubmed: 15036226
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2392-2401
pubmed: 28632865
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Aug 7;94(15):1160-7
pubmed: 12165641
Gastroenterology. 2016 May;150(5):1135-1146
pubmed: 26836586
Cancer Biol Ther. 2014 Jun 1;15(6):768-76
pubmed: 24642870
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jul 09;107(10):
pubmed: 26160882
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 19;103(20):1498-506
pubmed: 21997132
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jul 15;101(14):984-92
pubmed: 19584328
Cancer. 2012 Feb 15;118(4):1083-90
pubmed: 21800287
Cancer. 2008 Feb 15;112(4):900-8
pubmed: 18181101