Health Care Workers' Attitudes Toward Patients With COVID-19.

COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 infection attitudes children ethics health care providers nurses

Journal

Open forum infectious diseases
ISSN: 2328-8957
Titre abrégé: Open Forum Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101637045

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 27 03 2021
accepted: 14 07 2021
entrez: 11 8 2021
pubmed: 12 8 2021
medline: 12 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Early in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, before the routine availability and/or use of personal protective equipment, health care workers were understandably concerned. Our aim was to explore health care workers' attitudes toward patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 at the time of the nation's first surge in 2 highly affected hospitals in New York. We performed a cross-sectional, self-administered survey study of health care workers. The survey consisted of 17 multiple-choice questions including demographic information, ethics, and willingness to care for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Subgroup analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test. Of 340 health care workers approached, 338 (99.4%) consented to the survey; 163 (48.7%) were registered nurses and 160 (48.3%) lived with children. While 326 (97.3%) workers were concerned about putting their family/coworkers at risk of infection after caring for a patient with SARS-CoV-2, only 30 (8.9%) were unwilling to treat a patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Registered nurses were more likely than other health care workers to think it was ethical to refuse care for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, worried more often about contracting infection, and felt that SARS-CoV-2 added to their stress level ( Levels of stress and concern were extremely high. In spite of that, the overwhelming majority of workers were willing to treat patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Registered nurses and health care workers who live with children were more likely to think it is ethical to refuse care for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Early in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, before the routine availability and/or use of personal protective equipment, health care workers were understandably concerned. Our aim was to explore health care workers' attitudes toward patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 at the time of the nation's first surge in 2 highly affected hospitals in New York.
METHODS METHODS
We performed a cross-sectional, self-administered survey study of health care workers. The survey consisted of 17 multiple-choice questions including demographic information, ethics, and willingness to care for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Subgroup analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 340 health care workers approached, 338 (99.4%) consented to the survey; 163 (48.7%) were registered nurses and 160 (48.3%) lived with children. While 326 (97.3%) workers were concerned about putting their family/coworkers at risk of infection after caring for a patient with SARS-CoV-2, only 30 (8.9%) were unwilling to treat a patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Registered nurses were more likely than other health care workers to think it was ethical to refuse care for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, worried more often about contracting infection, and felt that SARS-CoV-2 added to their stress level (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Levels of stress and concern were extremely high. In spite of that, the overwhelming majority of workers were willing to treat patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Registered nurses and health care workers who live with children were more likely to think it is ethical to refuse care for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34377732
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab375
pii: ofab375
pmc: PMC8339607
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

ofab375

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Références

J Radiol Nurs. 2020 Sep;39(3):176-178
pubmed: 32837392
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2425-2427
pubmed: 32421144
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 09;3(1):ofv192
pubmed: 26788546
Am J Med. 2018 Aug;131(8):972.e9-972.e15
pubmed: 29649458
Am J Public Health. 1988 Apr;78(4):455-9
pubmed: 3348474
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 09;8(1):ofaa582
pubmed: 33447642
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976
pubmed: 32202646
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;72(9):1645-1648
pubmed: 32628750
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):922
pubmed: 32199474

Auteurs

Joseph Ottolenghi (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.

Rodney A McLaren (RA)

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.

Cecilia Bahamon (C)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.

Mudar Dalloul (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.

Sandra McCalla (S)

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.

Howard Minkoff (H)

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
School of Public Health at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA.

Classifications MeSH