Using Machine Learning to Predict Remission in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Treated With Desvenlafaxine.
antidepressants
artificial intelligence
diagnosis
machine learning
major depressive disorder
randomized controlled trial
symptom remission
Journal
Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie
ISSN: 1497-0015
Titre abrégé: Can J Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7904187
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
12
8
2021
medline:
21
4
2022
entrez:
11
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and burdensome condition that has low rates of treatment success for each individual treatment. This means that many patients require several medication switches to achieve remission; selecting an effective antidepressant is typically a sequential trial-and-error process. Machine learning techniques may be able to learn models that can predict whether a specific patient will respond to a given treatment, before it is administered. This study uses baseline clinical data to create a machine-learned model that accurately predicts remission status for a patient after desvenlafaxine (DVS) treatment. We applied machine learning algorithms to data from 3,399 MDD patients (90% of the 3,776 subjects in 11 phase-III/IV clinical trials, each described using 92 features), to produce a model that uses 26 of these features to predict symptom remission, defined as an 8-week Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 7 or below. We evaluated that learned model on the remaining held-out 10% of the data ( Our resulting classifier, a trained linear support vector machine, had a holdout set accuracy of 69.0%, significantly greater than the probability of classifying a patient correctly by chance. We demonstrate that this learning process is stable by repeatedly sampling part of the training dataset and running the learner on this sample, then evaluating the learned model on the held-out instances of the training set; these runs had an average accuracy of 67.0% ± 1.8%. Our model, based on 26 clinical features, proved sufficient to predict DVS remission significantly better than chance. This may allow more accurate use of DVS without waiting 8 weeks to determine treatment outcome, and may serve as a first step toward changing psychiatric care by incorporating clinical assistive technologies using machine-learned models.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and burdensome condition that has low rates of treatment success for each individual treatment. This means that many patients require several medication switches to achieve remission; selecting an effective antidepressant is typically a sequential trial-and-error process. Machine learning techniques may be able to learn models that can predict whether a specific patient will respond to a given treatment, before it is administered. This study uses baseline clinical data to create a machine-learned model that accurately predicts remission status for a patient after desvenlafaxine (DVS) treatment.
METHODS
We applied machine learning algorithms to data from 3,399 MDD patients (90% of the 3,776 subjects in 11 phase-III/IV clinical trials, each described using 92 features), to produce a model that uses 26 of these features to predict symptom remission, defined as an 8-week Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 7 or below. We evaluated that learned model on the remaining held-out 10% of the data (
RESULTS
Our resulting classifier, a trained linear support vector machine, had a holdout set accuracy of 69.0%, significantly greater than the probability of classifying a patient correctly by chance. We demonstrate that this learning process is stable by repeatedly sampling part of the training dataset and running the learner on this sample, then evaluating the learned model on the held-out instances of the training set; these runs had an average accuracy of 67.0% ± 1.8%.
CONCLUSIONS
Our model, based on 26 clinical features, proved sufficient to predict DVS remission significantly better than chance. This may allow more accurate use of DVS without waiting 8 weeks to determine treatment outcome, and may serve as a first step toward changing psychiatric care by incorporating clinical assistive technologies using machine-learned models.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34379019
doi: 10.1177/07067437211037141
pmc: PMC8808003
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antidepressive Agents
0
Desvenlafaxine Succinate
ZB22ENF0XR
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
39-47Références
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Jul;78:94-102
pubmed: 27089522
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2016 Sep 1;18(5):
pubmed: 27835721
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Sep;144(3):277-287
pubmed: 34139020
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;3(3):243-50
pubmed: 26803397
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2002 Jul;27(4):235-9
pubmed: 12174732
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9
pubmed: 444788
J Affect Disord. 2018 Dec 1;241:519-532
pubmed: 30153635
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62
pubmed: 14399272
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006 Aug;318(2):657-65
pubmed: 16675639
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):28-40
pubmed: 16390886
Psychother Res. 2021 Jan;31(1):78-91
pubmed: 32964809
Neuroimage. 2011 May 15;56(2):809-13
pubmed: 20483379
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jun;215:299-313
pubmed: 28364701
CNS Drugs. 2009 Aug;23(8):627-47
pubmed: 19594193
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;61(9):540-60
pubmed: 27486148
J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jan;7(1):127-35
pubmed: 20231764
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;161(12):2163-77
pubmed: 15569884
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 6;155(11):772-85
pubmed: 22147715
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;66(8):1064-70
pubmed: 16086624