Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinical decision support Critical care (6 allowed) Electronic medical record Information display User-centered design User-computer interface

Journal

Journal of biomedical informatics
ISSN: 1532-0480
Titre abrégé: J Biomed Inform
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100970413

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 03 10 2018
revised: 10 06 2019
accepted: 16 06 2019
entrez: 13 8 2021
pubmed: 1 1 2019
medline: 1 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To systematically review original user evaluations of patient information displays relevant to critical care and understand the impact of design frameworks and information presentation approaches on decision-making, efficiency, workload, and preferences of clinicians. We included studies that evaluated information displays designed to support real-time care decisions in critical care or anesthesiology using simulated tasks. We searched PubMed and IEEExplore from 1/1/1990 to 6/30/2018. The search strategy was developed iteratively with calibration against known references. Inclusion screening was completed independently by two authors. Extraction of display features, design processes, and evaluation method was completed by one and verified by a second author. Fifty-six manuscripts evaluating 32 critical care and 22 anesthesia displays were included. Primary outcome metrics included clinician accuracy and efficiency in recognizing, diagnosing, and treating problems. Implementing user-centered design (UCD) processes, especially iterative evaluation and redesign, resulted in positive impact in outcomes such as accuracy and efficiency. Innovative display approaches that led to improved human-system performance in critical care included: (1) improving the integration and organization of information, (2) improving the representation of trend information, and (3) implementing graphical approaches to make relationships between data visible. Our review affirms the value of key principles of UCD. Improved information presentation can facilitate faster information interpretation and more accurate diagnoses and treatment. Improvements to information organization and support for rapid interpretation of time-based relationships between related quantitative data is warranted. Designers and developers are encouraged to involve users in formal iterative design and evaluation activities in the design of electronic health records (EHRs), clinical informatics applications, and clinical devices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34384575
pii: S2590-177X(19)30040-X
doi: 10.1016/j.yjbinx.2019.100041
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100041

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Auteurs

Melanie C Wright (MC)

Trinity Health, Livonia, MI, USA; Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA. Electronic address: Melanie.wright@trinity-health.org.

Damian Borbolla (D)

Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Rosalie G Waller (RG)

Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Guilherme Del Fiol (G)

Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Thomas Reese (T)

Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Paige Nesbitt (P)

Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA.

Noa Segall (N)

Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Classifications MeSH