Using hydrologic landscape classification and climatic time series to assess hydrologic vulnerability of the western U.S. to climate.
Journal
Hydrology and earth system sciences
ISSN: 1607-7938
Titre abrégé: Hydrol Earth Syst Sci
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101717742
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Jun 2021
11 Jun 2021
Historique:
entrez:
13
8
2021
pubmed:
14
8
2021
medline:
14
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We apply the hydrologic landscape (HL) concept to assess the hydrologic vulnerability of the western United States (U.S.) to projected climate conditions. Our goal is to understand the potential impacts of hydrologic vulnerability for stakeholder-defined interests across large geographic areas. The basic assumption of the HL approach is that catchments that share similar physical and climatic characteristics are expected to have similar hydrologic characteristics. We use the hydrologic landscape vulnerability approach (HLVA) to map the HLVA index (an assessment of climate vulnerability) by integrating hydrologic landscapes into a retrospective analysis of historical data to assess variability in future climate projections and hydrology, which includes temperature, precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, snow accumulation, climatic moisture, surplus water, and seasonality of water surplus. Projections that are beyond 2 standard deviations of the historical decadal average contribute to the HLVA index for each metric. Separating vulnerability into these seven separate metrics allows stakeholders and/or water resource managers to have a more specific understanding of the potential impacts of future conditions. We also apply this approach to examine case studies. The case studies (Mt. Hood, Willamette Valley, and Napa-Sonoma Valley) are important to the ski and wine industries and illustrate how our approach might be used by specific stakeholders. The resulting vulnerability maps show that temperature and potential evapotranspiration are consistently projected to have high vulnerability indices for the western U.S. Precipitation vulnerability is not as spatially uniform as temperature. The highest-elevation areas with snow are projected to experience significant changes in snow accumulation. The seasonality vulnerability map shows that specific mountainous areas in the west are most prone to changes in seasonality, whereas many transitional terrains are moderately susceptible. This paper illustrates how HL and the HLVA can help assess climatic and hydrologic vulnerability across large spatial scales. By combining the HL concept and HLVA, resource managers could consider future climate conditions in their decisions about managing important economic and conservation resources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34385811
doi: 10.5194/hess-25-3179-2021
pmc: PMC8353951
mid: NIHMS1714591
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Intramural EPA
ID : EPA999999
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 17;104(16):6720-5
pubmed: 17412830
Science. 2001 Jul 6;293(5527):85-9
pubmed: 11441178
Science. 2000 Jul 14;289(5477):284-8
pubmed: 10894773
Sci Adv. 2015 Feb 12;1(1):e1400082
pubmed: 26601131
Nature. 2005 Nov 17;438(7066):303-9
pubmed: 16292301
Sci Adv. 2016 Feb 12;2(2):e1500323
pubmed: 26933676
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19656-19657
pubmed: 32747549
Environ Manage. 2004;34 Suppl 1:S71-88
pubmed: 16044554
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 31;112(13):3858-9
pubmed: 25829537