Usability, occupational performance and satisfaction evaluation of a smart environment controlled by infrared oculography by people with severe motor disabilities.
Adult
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
/ pathology
Brain-Computer Interfaces
/ standards
Disability Evaluation
Disabled Persons
/ psychology
Environment
Female
Humans
Independent Living
/ standards
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational Therapy
/ methods
Personal Satisfaction
Self-Help Devices
/ statistics & numerical data
Spinal Cord Injuries
/ pathology
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
29
04
2020
accepted:
31
07
2021
entrez:
13
8
2021
pubmed:
14
8
2021
medline:
29
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A smart environment is an assistive technology space that can enable people with motor disabilities to control their equipment (TV, radio, fan, etc.) through a human-machine interface activated by different inputs. However, assistive technology resources are not always considered useful, reaching quite high abandonment rate. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a smart environment controlled through infrared oculography by people with severe motor disabilities. The study sample was composed of six individuals with motor disabilities. Initially, sociodemographic data forms, the Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM), and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) were applied. The participants used the system in their domestic environment for a week. Afterwards, they were reevaluated with regards to occupational performance (COPM), satisfaction with the use of the assistive technology resource (QUEST 2.0), psychosocial impact (PIADS) and usability of the system (SUS), as well as through semi-structured interviews for suggestions or complaints. The most common demand from the participants of this research was 'control of the TV'. Two participants did not use the system. All participants who used the system (four) presented positive results in all assessment protocols, evidencing greater independence in the control of the smart environment equipment. In addition, they evaluated the system as useful and with good usability. Non-acceptance of disability and lack of social support may have influenced the results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34388175
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256062
pii: PONE-D-20-12562
pmc: PMC8362986
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0256062Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Google Inc. only supported the research through Google’s Latin America Research Awards (https://research.google/philosophy/) to two authors, Teodiano Freire Bastos-Filho and Alexandre Luís Cardoso Bissoli, and this does not alter our adherence to Plos ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
J Health Psychol. 2019 Mar;24(4):480-494
pubmed: 27852887
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006 Jan-Jun;1(1-2):59-67
pubmed: 19256168
Lancet. 2017 Nov 4;390(10107):2084-2098
pubmed: 28552366
Mult Scler. 2006 Feb;12(1):88-93
pubmed: 16459724
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Nov;13(8):724-730
pubmed: 28875740
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010 Feb;21(1):33-42
pubmed: 19951776
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(3):268-81
pubmed: 20939677
Occup Ther Int. 2010 Sep;17(3):152-8
pubmed: 20672255
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(3):189-206
pubmed: 21110728
Am J Occup Ther. 2009 Sep-Oct;63(5):621-5
pubmed: 19785261
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Jan;2(1):23-33
pubmed: 19263551
Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:926858
pubmed: 24348748
NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;25(3):209-17
pubmed: 19893189
J Rehabil Med. 2002 Sep;34(5):201-4
pubmed: 12392233
Lancet. 2009 Nov 28;374(9704):1863-5
pubmed: 19944867
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(24):2095-102
pubmed: 22497196
Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Jan 10-Feb 15;24(1-3):115-25
pubmed: 11827145
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017 Apr;13:87-92
pubmed: 28427709
Mult Scler. 2015 Oct;21(12):1566-74
pubmed: 25662346
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD006412
pubmed: 18843715
Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:339-51
pubmed: 19818912
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:5032-5
pubmed: 26737422
Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2018 Jan - Feb;33(1):35-46
pubmed: 25825074
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jun 08;13:92
pubmed: 22682404
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Feb 19;19(4):
pubmed: 30791414
Neuroimage. 2004 Jun;22(2):767-70
pubmed: 15193605
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Aug 15;14(8):15039-64
pubmed: 25196009
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 10;107(32):14413-8
pubmed: 20660716
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;75(2):127-32
pubmed: 8311667
J Rehabil Med. 2001 Jul;33(4):187-91
pubmed: 11506218
Rev Bras Reumatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;54(4):260-7
pubmed: 25627220
Assist Technol. 1993;5(1):36-45
pubmed: 10171664
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Feb;12(2):128-136
pubmed: 26696309
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Sep;8(5):373-80
pubmed: 23350880
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Sep 15;368:35-40
pubmed: 27538598