Survival patterns of invasive lobular and invasive ductal breast cancer in a large population-based cohort with two decades of follow up.

Ductal breast cancer Excess mortality rate ratio Lobular breast cancer Relative survival rate

Journal

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-3080
Titre abrégé: Breast
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9213011

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 26 05 2021
revised: 08 07 2021
accepted: 16 07 2021
pubmed: 14 8 2021
medline: 16 10 2021
entrez: 13 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) comprises 8-15 % of all invasive breast cancers and large population-based studies with >10 years of follow-up are rare. Whether ILC has a long-time prognosis different from that of invasive ductal carcinoma, (IDC) remains controversial. To investigate the excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR) of patients with ILC and IDC and to correlate survival with clinical parameters in a large population-based cohort. From 1989 through 2006, we identified 17,481 patients diagnosed with IDC (n = 14,583) or ILC (n = 2898), younger than 76 years from two Swedish Regional Cancer Registries. Relative survival (RS) during 20 years of follow up was analysed. ILC was significantly associated with older age, larger tumours, ER positivity and well differentiated tumours. We noticed an improved survival for patients with ILC during the first five years, excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR) 0.64 (CI 95 % 0.53-0.77). This was shifted to a significant decreased survival 10-15 years after diagnosis (EMRR 1.49, CI 95 % 1.16-1.93). After 20 years the relative survival rates were similar, 0.72 for ILC and 0.73 for IDC. During the first five years after surgery, the EMRR was lower for patients with ILC as compared to patients with IDC, but during the years 10-15 after surgery, we observed an increased EMRR for patients with ILC as compared to IDC. These EMRR between ILC and IDC were statistically significant but the absolute difference in excess mortality between the two groups was small.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) comprises 8-15 % of all invasive breast cancers and large population-based studies with >10 years of follow-up are rare. Whether ILC has a long-time prognosis different from that of invasive ductal carcinoma, (IDC) remains controversial.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
To investigate the excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR) of patients with ILC and IDC and to correlate survival with clinical parameters in a large population-based cohort.
MATERIAL AND METHODS METHODS
From 1989 through 2006, we identified 17,481 patients diagnosed with IDC (n = 14,583) or ILC (n = 2898), younger than 76 years from two Swedish Regional Cancer Registries. Relative survival (RS) during 20 years of follow up was analysed.
RESULTS RESULTS
ILC was significantly associated with older age, larger tumours, ER positivity and well differentiated tumours. We noticed an improved survival for patients with ILC during the first five years, excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR) 0.64 (CI 95 % 0.53-0.77). This was shifted to a significant decreased survival 10-15 years after diagnosis (EMRR 1.49, CI 95 % 1.16-1.93). After 20 years the relative survival rates were similar, 0.72 for ILC and 0.73 for IDC.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
During the first five years after surgery, the EMRR was lower for patients with ILC as compared to patients with IDC, but during the years 10-15 after surgery, we observed an increased EMRR for patients with ILC as compared to IDC. These EMRR between ILC and IDC were statistically significant but the absolute difference in excess mortality between the two groups was small.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34388695
pii: S0960-9776(21)00420-3
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.07.011
pmc: PMC8361199
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

294-300

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

C Chamalidou (C)

Institution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden. Electronic address: chaido.chamalidou@vgregion.se.

H Fohlin (H)

Regional Cancer Center of Southeast Sweden, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Medical Faculty, Linköping University, Sweden.

P Albertsson (P)

Institution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

L-G Arnesson (LG)

Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Medical Faculty, Linköping University, Sweden.

Z Einbeigi (Z)

Institution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Södra Älvsborgs Hospital, Borås, Sweden.

E Holmberg (E)

Regional Cancer Centre of Western Sweden, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.

A Nordenskjöld (A)

Department of Oncology, Södra Älvsborgs Hospital, Borås, Sweden.

B Nordenskjöld (B)

Regional Cancer Center of Southeast Sweden, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.

P Karlsson (P)

Institution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

B Linderholm (B)

Institution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH