Results of endovascular treatment of venous anastomotic stenosis in prosthetic arteriovenous for hemodialysis PTFE grafts. Comparative analysis between patent and occluded grafts.

Resultados del tratamiento endovascular de la estenosis de la anastomosis venosa en las fístulas arteriovenosas protésicas para hemodiálisis de PTFE. Análisis comparativo entre fístulas permeables y trombosadas.
Anastomosis Anastomotic Arteriovenosa Arteriovenous Estenosis Graft Prótesis Stenosis Stent Thrombectomy Trombectomía

Journal

Nefrologia
ISSN: 2013-2514
Titre abrégé: Nefrologia (Engl Ed)
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101778581

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 24 04 2020
revised: 08 10 2020
accepted: 17 03 2021
entrez: 15 8 2021
pubmed: 16 8 2021
medline: 16 8 2021
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To analyze the results of endovascular treatment of venous anastomotic stenosis (VAS) in humero-axillary arteriovenous grafts (HAG), comparing outcomes between patent and thrombosed HAG. A retrospective cohort study was made of endovascular treated patients because of a VAS in a HAG between January 2009 and December 2019. Group A: Thrombosed HAG secondary to a VAS. Group B: Patent HAG with a VAS detected during follow-up. Technical success was defined as residual stenosis after treatment <30%, and clinical success as satisfactory immediate dialysis after surgery. After ET a biannual clinical and ultrasound follow-up was performed. Survival analysis was performed for time-to-event data to assess patency. Group A: 55 patients. Group B: 22. There were no significative differences in demographic and anatomical factors between groups. Technical and clinical success were 100% in Group B and 94.5% and 91% respectively in Group A. Primary patency at 1, 6 and 12 months was: Group A: 81.8%, 22.4% and 15.7% respectively. Group B: 100%, 85.9%, 76.4% (p<0.001). Secondary patency at 1, 6 and 12 months was: Group A: 85.2%, 45.8% and 31.3% respectively. Group B 100%, 95.3%, 95.2% (p<0.001). Use of non-covered stents was associated with an increased risk of occlusion (HR 2.669 95% CI 1.146-6.216, p=0.010). A higher patency of EV performed on a patent HAG is expected. It is therefore advisable to develop surveillance programs that are capable to detect VAS before its occlusion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34391607
pii: S0211-6995(21)00147-8
doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.03.015
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng spa

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ferrán Plá Sánchez (F)

Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España. Electronic address: ferplasan@gmail.com.

Guillermo Moñux Ducajú (G)

Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Universitario HM Torrelodones, Madrid, España.

Oscar Uclés Cabeza (O)

Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España.

Rodrigo Rial (R)

Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Universitario HM Torrelodones, Madrid, España.

Adriana Baturone Blanco (A)

Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España.

Julio Reina Barrera (J)

Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España.

Antonio Martín Conejero (AM)

Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España.

Francisco Javier Serrano Hernando (FJ)

Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España.

Classifications MeSH