Concerns, coping and the electronic Holistic Needs Assessment: experiences of UK breast cancer survivors.

breast cancer holistic needs assessment qualitative survivorship unmet needs

Journal

Journal of research in nursing : JRN
ISSN: 1744-988X
Titre abrégé: J Res Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101234311

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez: 16 8 2021
pubmed: 1 3 2020
medline: 1 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Physical and psychological concerns associated with a breast cancer diagnosis continue long after treatment. Macmillan Cancer Support developed an electronic Holistic Needs Assessment (eHNA) to help identify these concerns and allow a healthcare professional to address these as part of The Recovery Package. The study aim was to understand the women's experiences of having breast cancer, and of completing Macmillan's eHNA as part of their care. A qualitative approach was adopted. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 15 women, 12-18 months following surgical treatment for invasive breast cancer. Thematic analysis identified key themes. Four main themes were identified in relation to experiences of the eHNA, experiences of breast cancer, coping with breast cancer and the psychological effects of surviving. Perceptions towards the eHNA varied; some women viewed the eHNA as a research tool for hospital use rather than a beneficial aspect of their care. Several participants felt unable to raise their psychological concerns on the eHNA. Although experiences differ, psychological issues remain a key factor for women with breast cancer, lasting long after treatment. The eHNA is not currently used to its potential or recognised by women as a tool to support their care. Further research is needed into how the eHNA can be used effectively to capture psychological concerns and determine best approaches to implementation of the tool to support individualised care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Physical and psychological concerns associated with a breast cancer diagnosis continue long after treatment. Macmillan Cancer Support developed an electronic Holistic Needs Assessment (eHNA) to help identify these concerns and allow a healthcare professional to address these as part of The Recovery Package.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
The study aim was to understand the women's experiences of having breast cancer, and of completing Macmillan's eHNA as part of their care.
METHODS METHODS
A qualitative approach was adopted. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 15 women, 12-18 months following surgical treatment for invasive breast cancer. Thematic analysis identified key themes.
RESULTS RESULTS
Four main themes were identified in relation to experiences of the eHNA, experiences of breast cancer, coping with breast cancer and the psychological effects of surviving. Perceptions towards the eHNA varied; some women viewed the eHNA as a research tool for hospital use rather than a beneficial aspect of their care. Several participants felt unable to raise their psychological concerns on the eHNA.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although experiences differ, psychological issues remain a key factor for women with breast cancer, lasting long after treatment. The eHNA is not currently used to its potential or recognised by women as a tool to support their care. Further research is needed into how the eHNA can be used effectively to capture psychological concerns and determine best approaches to implementation of the tool to support individualised care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34394613
doi: 10.1177/1744987119829801
pii: 10.1177_1744987119829801
pmc: PMC7932206
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

97-110

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Références

Psychooncology. 2018 Sep;27(9):2141-2147
pubmed: 29802652
Oncology (Williston Park). 2008 May;22(6):642-6, 650; discussion 650, 653
pubmed: 18561553
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Feb;19(2):193-202
pubmed: 20069436
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Dec;17(6):797-801
pubmed: 23623650
Acta Oncol. 2011 Feb;50(2):187-93
pubmed: 21231780
J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Jun;9(2):260-8
pubmed: 25343971
Cancer Nurs. 2007 Mar-Apr;30(2):101-11
pubmed: 17413775
Breast. 2011 Jun;20(3):271-7
pubmed: 21236671
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Dec;38(6):849-59
pubmed: 19819668
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Aug;23:59-65
pubmed: 27456376
Cancer. 2010 Aug 1;116(15):3549-57
pubmed: 20564138
Health Psychol. 2010 Mar;29(2):160-8
pubmed: 20230089
Psychooncology. 2006 Feb;15(2):143-59
pubmed: 15880638
J Health Psychol. 2010 May;15(4):543-52
pubmed: 20460411
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Jun;26(2):372-80
pubmed: 22070423
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1101-9
pubmed: 21300931
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Sep;19(9):1367-78
pubmed: 20652602
Br J Nurs. 2012 May 24-Jun 13;21(10):S18, S20-6
pubmed: 22875264
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Oct 16;9:26152
pubmed: 25326092

Auteurs

Lydia Briggs (L)

PhD Student, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK.

Joanne Cooper (J)

Assistant Director of Nursing (Research, Innovation and Professional Regulation), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.

Karen Cox (K)

Vice Chancellor & President, University of Kent, UK.

Holly Blake (H)

Associate Professor of Behavioural Science, Director of Postgraduate Research & Environment, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, UK.

Classifications MeSH