Mechanical heart valves and pregnancy: Issues surrounding anticoagulation. Experience from two obstetric cardiac centres.

High-risk pregnancy anticoagulation heart valve diseases mechanical heart valve pregnancy complications

Journal

Obstetric medicine
ISSN: 1753-495X
Titre abrégé: Obstet Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101464191

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 05 12 2019
accepted: 05 04 2020
entrez: 16 8 2021
pubmed: 17 8 2021
medline: 17 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pregnant women with mechanical heart valves are at significant risk of obstetric/cardiac complications. This study compares the anticoagulation management in two obstetric cardiac centres. Retrospective case-note review from Chelsea and Westminster/Royal Brompton Hospitals (CR) and Erasmus Medical Centre (EMC). Main outcome measure was mechanical heart valve thrombosis. Nineteen pregnancies from CR and 25 pregnancies from EMC were included. Most women were on low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) throughout pregnancy at CR, whereas at EMC most had LMWH in the first trimester and vitamin K antagonists in subsequent trimesters. Peak anti-factor Xa were performed monthly at CR, levels 0.39-1.51 IU/mL (mean 0.82 IU/mL). Anticoagulation management peri-partum was inconsistent. Delivery was mainly by caesarean section at CR (74%) and vaginal delivery at EMC (64%). No maternal deaths and only one mechanical heart valve thrombosis at CR. Two mechanical heart valve thromboses and one maternal death at EMC. Peri-partum anticoagulation strategies, anticoagulation monitoring and mode of delivery inconsistencies reported.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pregnant women with mechanical heart valves are at significant risk of obstetric/cardiac complications. This study compares the anticoagulation management in two obstetric cardiac centres.
METHODS METHODS
Retrospective case-note review from Chelsea and Westminster/Royal Brompton Hospitals (CR) and Erasmus Medical Centre (EMC). Main outcome measure was mechanical heart valve thrombosis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Nineteen pregnancies from CR and 25 pregnancies from EMC were included. Most women were on low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) throughout pregnancy at CR, whereas at EMC most had LMWH in the first trimester and vitamin K antagonists in subsequent trimesters. Peak anti-factor Xa were performed monthly at CR, levels 0.39-1.51 IU/mL (mean 0.82 IU/mL). Anticoagulation management peri-partum was inconsistent. Delivery was mainly by caesarean section at CR (74%) and vaginal delivery at EMC (64%). No maternal deaths and only one mechanical heart valve thrombosis at CR. Two mechanical heart valve thromboses and one maternal death at EMC.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Peri-partum anticoagulation strategies, anticoagulation monitoring and mode of delivery inconsistencies reported.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34394718
doi: 10.1177/1753495X20924937
pii: 10.1177_1753495X20924937
pmc: PMC8358247
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

95-101

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 6;69(22):2681-2691
pubmed: 28571631
BJOG. 2017 Aug;124(9):1421
pubmed: 28194864
Obstet Med. 2014 Jun;7(2):77-83
pubmed: 27512428
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791
pubmed: 28886619
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 6;69(22):2692-2695
pubmed: 28571632
Thromb Res. 2013 Jan;131 Suppl 1:S8-10
pubmed: 23452748
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2016 Oct;42(7):798-804
pubmed: 27706532
Circulation. 2015 Jul 14;132(2):132-42
pubmed: 26100109
Eur Heart J. 2017 May 14;38(19):1509-1516
pubmed: 28329059
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012 May 15;9(7):415-24
pubmed: 22584941
Thromb Res. 2011 Feb;127 Suppl 3:S56-60
pubmed: 21262443
BJOG. 2017 Aug;124(9):1411-1419
pubmed: 28019065
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Nov 12;20(12):102
pubmed: 30417314
Anaesthesia. 2013 Sep;68(9):966-72
pubmed: 23905877
Heart. 2017 Feb;103(3):244-252
pubmed: 27670966
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Sep;19(5):451-6
pubmed: 24607762
Thromb Res. 2012 Sep;130(3):334-8
pubmed: 22475315
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 18;68(16):1804-1813
pubmed: 27737747
Int J Womens Health. 2018 Oct 25;10:663-670
pubmed: 30498374
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 7;39(34):3165-3241
pubmed: 30165544
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jul;38(5):721-722
pubmed: 29436886
Circulation. 2013 Sep 24;128(13):1462-9
pubmed: 23940396

Auteurs

Francois Dos Santos (F)

Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Lucia Baris (L)

Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Alice Varley (A)

Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Jerome Cornette (J)

Department of Obstetric Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Joanna Allam (J)

Department of Anaesthesia, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.

Philip Steer (P)

Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Lorna Swan (L)

Department of Cardiology, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

Michael Gatzoulis (M)

Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

Jolien Roos-Hesselink (J)

Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Mark R Johnson (MR)

Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH