Adherence to Long-Term Follow-up in Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas Managed With Serial Observation.
adherence
follow-up
observational surveillance
sporadic vestibular schwannoma
Journal
OTO open
ISSN: 2473-974X
Titre abrégé: OTO Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101717942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
29
04
2021
accepted:
14
07
2021
entrez:
16
8
2021
pubmed:
17
8
2021
medline:
17
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To examine the long-term adherence to serial imaging of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma and analyze factors associated with being lost to follow-up. Retrospective chart review with telephone interview. Single tertiary care center. Patients with a sporadic vestibular schwannoma and started on observational surveillance management between January 2005 and December 2010 were included. Demographic data, tumor size, hearing and vestibular changes, and follow-up length were recorded. Patient factors were analyzed for association with being lost to follow-up. In total, 122 patients were included with a median length of follow-up of 5 months (range, 0-146). After initial surveillance, 22.1% (n = 27) of patients had a change in management to either microsurgery or radiosurgery. Of the remaining 77.9% (n = 95), nearly half (44.2%, n = 42) never returned for a second visit, and all but 3 were eventually lost to follow-up. There was no association between sex, race, age at diagnosis, initial tumor size, insurance status, household income, or driving distance to hospital and being lost to follow-up. Of 26 interviewed patients initially lost to follow-up, 11 (42.3%) sought care at another institution, 5 (19.2%) chose to no longer receive care, 1 (3.8%) had transportation difficulties, and 9 (36.4%) had poor understanding of their diagnosis or instructions. The length of follow-up for patients undergoing surveillance of sporadic vestibular schwannoma varies widely, and patients are commonly lost to follow-up. Further efforts should be made to identify at-risk patients and provide adequate education to improve long-term surveillance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34396030
doi: 10.1177/2473974X211036653
pii: 10.1177_2473974X211036653
pmc: PMC8358519
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2473974X211036653Informations de copyright
© The Authors 2021.
Références
Otol Neurotol. 2006 Jun;27(4):547-52
pubmed: 16791048
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2011 Dec;44(6):1235-50, vii
pubmed: 22032478
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jun 1;44(3):545-50
pubmed: 10348283
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:e859-e863
pubmed: 32450309
Laryngoscope. 2010 Apr;120(4):783-90
pubmed: 20213657
J Neurosurg. 2009 Apr;110(4):662-9
pubmed: 19099381
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 01;80(1):49-56
pubmed: 27571523
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 20;(11):CD000011
pubmed: 25412402
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Oct;41(9):e1154-e1157
pubmed: 32925860
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 06;9(8):e104266
pubmed: 25100267
Neurosurgery. 1996 Aug;39(2):260-4; discussion 264-6
pubmed: 8832662
Clin Otolaryngol. 2008 Jun;33(3):228-35
pubmed: 18559028
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Sep;159(3):535-542
pubmed: 29685084
Am J Otol. 2000 Nov;21(6):857-62
pubmed: 11078076
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Mar;142(3):400-4
pubmed: 20172388
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019 Aug;80(4):333-337
pubmed: 31316879
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Feb 1;16(1):61
pubmed: 33522938
J Neurosurg. 2019 Aug 2;:1-7
pubmed: 31374553
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Sep;153(3):440-6
pubmed: 26129740
Laryngoscope. 2000 Apr;110(4):497-508
pubmed: 10763994
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Nov;38(11):2034-2043
pubmed: 28546250
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Apr;36(4):638-46
pubmed: 25415463
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Nov;161(11):2265-2269
pubmed: 31392568
J Neurosurg. 2015 Apr;122(4):833-42
pubmed: 25555165
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;38(6):408-16
pubmed: 26626030