Effects of different preoperative enteral nutrition feeding routes on the duration of gastrointestinal decompression after definitive surgery for small intestinal fistula.
Intestinal fistula
Nasogastric route
Nasointestinal route
Outcomes
Surgery
Journal
Langenbeck's archives of surgery
ISSN: 1435-2451
Titre abrégé: Langenbecks Arch Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9808285
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
19
02
2021
accepted:
09
08
2021
pubmed:
17
8
2021
medline:
3
2
2022
entrez:
16
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of different preoperative enteral nutrition feeding routes on the duration of gastrointestinal decompression after definitive surgery for small intestinal fistula. From January 2015 to June 2019, patients with small intestinal fistula and receiving a definitive surgery were enrolled. According to the feeding route, patients were divided into a nasointestinal tube group and a nasogastric tube group. Clinical characteristics of the two groups were analyzed, and the influence of the two route on the recovery of gastrointestinal function was evaluated. A total of 151 patients were enrolled in our study. There were 49 patients in the nasogastric tube group, and 102 patients in the nasointestinal tube group. Enteral nutrition via nasogastric feeding route had a positive effect on shortening the duration of gastrointestinal decompression (adjusted HR = 2.488, 95% CI: 1.692-3.659, P < 0.001). After propensity matching (PM), 44 patients were enrolled (22 vs 22). EN via nasogastric tube was a positive factor for getting rid of gastrointestinal decompression (adjusted HR = 3.563, 95% CI: 1.639-7.746, P = 0.001). Preoperative enteral nutrition via nasogastric route can reduce the duration of gastrointestinal decompression after definitive surgery for small intestinal fistula.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34398262
doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02301-x
pii: 10.1007/s00423-021-02301-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2837-2848Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM et al (2019) ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr 38(1):48–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037
pubmed: 30348463
Tomoaki Y, Hiroyuki K, Nozomi O et al (2012) The effect of ultra-early enteral nutrition after esophagectomy on the prevention of intestinal mucosa atrophy and management of blood glucose. Eur J Anaesthesiol 29:183
doi: 10.1097/00003643-201206001-00607
Takayuki Y, Maki N, Saniabadi AR et al (2010) Impacts of long-term enteral nutrition on clinical and endoscopic disease activities and mucosal cytokines during remission in patients with Crohn’s disease: a prospective study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 12:1493–1501
Vaughn VM, Shuster D, Rogers MAM et al (2017) Early versus delayed feeding in patients with acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 166(12):883–892. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2533
doi: 10.7326/M16-2533
pubmed: 28505667
Dutta AK, Goel A, Kirubakaran R, Chacko A, Tharyan P (2020) Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3(3):CD010582. Published 2020 Mar 26. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010582.pub2
Metcalf C (2019) Considerations for the management of enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Nurs 28(5):S24–S31. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.5.S24
doi: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.5.S24
pubmed: 30907655
Lloyd DA, Gabe SM, Windsor AC (2006) Nutrition and management of enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg 93(9):1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5396
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5396
pubmed: 16804873
Venara A, Neunlist M, Slim K et al (2016) Postoperative ileus: Pathophysiology, incidence, and prevention. J Visc Surg 153(6):439–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.08.010
doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.08.010
pubmed: 27666979
Visschers RGJ, Damink SWMO, Winkens B et al (2008) Treatment strategies in 135 consecutive patients with enterocutaneous fistulas. World J Surg 32(3):445–453
doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9371-1
Kumpf VJ, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Diaz-Pizarro Graf JI et al (2017) ASPEN-FELANPE Clinical Guidelines. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 41(1):104–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607116680792
doi: 10.1177/0148607116680792
pubmed: 27913762
Fay KT, Ford ML, Coopersmith CM (2017) The intestinal microenvironment in sepsis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 1863(10 Pt B):2574–2583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.03.005
doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.03.005
pubmed: 28286161
Adelman MW, Woodworth MH, Langelier C, et al (2020) The gut microbiome’s role in the development, maintenance, and outcomes of sepsis. Crit Care 24(1):278. Published 2020 Jun 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02989-1
Taylor BE, McClave SA, Martindale RG et al (2016) Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). Crit Care Med 44(2):390–438. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001525
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001525
pubmed: 26771786
Boullata JI, Carrera AL, Harvey L et al (2017) ASPEN Safe practices for enteral nutrition therapy [Formula: see text]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 41(1):15–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607116673053
doi: 10.1177/0148607116673053
pubmed: 27815525
Wu Y, Ren J, Wang G et al (2014) Fistuloclysis improves liver function and nutritional status in patients with high-output upper enteric fistula. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014:941514
pubmed: 24719613
pmcid: 3955637
Bhat S, Sharma P, Cameron NR, Bissett IP, O’Grady G (2020) Chyme reinfusion for small bowel double enterostomies and enteroatmospheric fistulas in adult patients: a systematic review. Nutr Clin Pract 35(2):254–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10417
doi: 10.1002/ncp.10417
pubmed: 31549468
Duan M, Cao L, Gao L, Gong J, Li Y, Zhu W (2020) Chyme reinfusion is associated with lower rate of postoperative ileus in Crohn’s disease patients after stoma closure. Dig Dis Sci 65(1):243–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05753-w
doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05753-w
pubmed: 31367878
Abrisqueta J, Abellan I, Luján J, Hernández Q, Parrilla P (2014) Stimulation of the efferent limb before ileostomy closure: a randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 57(12):1391–1396. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000237
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000237
pubmed: 25380005
Miedema BW, Karlstrom L, Hanson RB, Johnson GP, Kelly KA (1990) Absorption and motility of the bypassed human ileum. Dis Colon Rectum 33(10):829–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051917
doi: 10.1007/BF02051917
pubmed: 2209271