Assessment of conformity of actual thoraco-lumbar pedicle screw dimensions to manufacturers' specifications.
Pedicle screws
biomechanics
spinal instrumentation
Journal
Science progress
ISSN: 2047-7163
Titre abrégé: Sci Prog
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0411361
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
16
8
2021
pubmed:
17
8
2021
medline:
19
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although correct selection of pedicle screw dimensions is indispensable to achieving optimum results, manufacturer-specified or intended dimensions may differ from actual dimensions. Here we analyzed the reliability of specifications made by various manufacturers by comparing them to the actual lengths and diameters of pedicle screws in a standardized experimental setup. We analyzed the actual length and diameter of pedicle screws of five different manufacturers. Four different screw lengths and for each length two different diameters were measured. Measurements were performed with the pedicle screws attached to a rod, with the length determined from the bottom of the tulip to the tip of the screw and the diameters determined at the proximal and distal threads. Differences in length of > 1 mm were found between the manufacturers' specifications and our actual measurements in 24 different pedicle screws. The highest deviation of the measured length from the manufacturers' specification was 3.2 mm. The difference in length between the shortest and longest screw with identical specifications was 3.4 mm. The highest deviation of the measured proximal thread diameters and the manufacturer's specifications was 0.5 mm. The diameter of the distal thread depends on the shape of the pedicle screw and hence varies between manufacturers in conical screws. We found clear differences in the length of pedicle screws with identical manufacturer specifications. Since differences between the actual dimensions and the dimensions indicated by the manufacturer may vary, this needs to be taken into account during the planning of spine instrumentation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34398723
doi: 10.1177/00368504211035035
pmc: PMC10358464
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
368504211035035Références
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Sep;13(3):403-6
pubmed: 20809738
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Nov;(284):34-46
pubmed: 1395312
J Spinal Disord. 1988;1(4):287-94
pubmed: 2980257
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Apr;14(4):367-72
pubmed: 2718038
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Jul;9(1):90-5
pubmed: 18590418
J Neurosurg Sci. 2018 Jun;62(3):271-278
pubmed: 26200141
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Nov 1;22(21):2504-9; discussion 2510
pubmed: 9383856
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Aug;92(8):1061-5
pubmed: 20675747
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2021 Jun;235(6):709-716
pubmed: 33730935
Med Eng Phys. 2020 May;79:44-51
pubmed: 32197920
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002 Feb;15(1):64-8
pubmed: 11891455
J Biomech Eng. 1996 Aug;118(3):391-8
pubmed: 8872262
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 15;35(20):E1064-8
pubmed: 20802385
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Mar;16(3 Suppl):S84-99
pubmed: 2028346
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Jun;21(5):533-7
pubmed: 16500737
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006 Dec;126(10):686-94
pubmed: 16865403