Ultrasound findings in peliosis hepatis.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
Focal liver lesions
Focal peliosis hepatis
Journal
Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea)
ISSN: 2288-5919
Titre abrégé: Ultrasonography
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101626019
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
10
10
2020
accepted:
22
02
2021
pubmed:
17
8
2021
medline:
17
8
2021
entrez:
16
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) findings in patients with peliosis hepatis (PH). A retrospective analysis was conducted of CEUS features in 24 patients with histopathologically confirmed PH (11 men and 13 women; mean age, 32.4±7.1 years; range, 28 to 41 years). All lesions were histologically proven, either by core needle biopsy (n=10) or by hepatic surgery (n=14). The mean size was 36.8±12.4 mm (range, 10 to 80 mm). On B-mode ultrasonography (BMUS), all PH lesions were heterogeneously hypoechoic, with well-defined margins but irregular shapes. No mass effect was observed. During the arterial phase of CEUS, all lesions displayed mild heterogeneous hyperenhancement (83.3%, 20/24) or isoenhancement (16.7%, 4/24). Furthermore, 87.5% of the PH lesions showed mild washout after 1 minute in the portal venous phase (30-120 seconds) and mild washout in the late phase (>120 seconds). The lack of a mass effect on BMUS, mild heterogeneous arterial hyperenhancement, and washout in the very late portal venous phase (after 1 minute) on CEUS are characteristic of PH. Although it is a histological diagnosis, PH should be considered in the differential diagnosis when the clinical context does not favor a malignancy or infection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34399044
pii: usg.20162
doi: 10.14366/usg.20162
pmc: PMC8446485
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
546-554Références
Med Ultrason. 2020 Mar 1;22(1):75-84
pubmed: 32096792
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jul;187(1):W43-52
pubmed: 16794138
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jan;29(1):5
pubmed: 24354992
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 14;21(46):13188-94
pubmed: 26675327
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;12(5):479-489
pubmed: 29658347
Abdom Imaging. 2001 Mar-Apr;26(2):197-9
pubmed: 11178700
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 7;20(9):2420-5
pubmed: 24605041
Arch Pathol. 1964 Feb;77:159-65
pubmed: 14088761
Z Gastroenterol. 2018 May;56(5):499-506
pubmed: 29734449
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Jun;136(23):1255-6
pubmed: 21630172
BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Sep 26;2013:
pubmed: 24072833
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(4):566-70
pubmed: 19183829
Pancreas. 2007 Oct;35(3):286-8
pubmed: 17895854
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jun;21(6):1095-1098
pubmed: 27783341
Z Gastroenterol. 2002 Jan;40(1):21-32
pubmed: 11803497
Gastroenterology. 2014 Jul;147(1):e7-8
pubmed: 24880008
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1815-1820
pubmed: 32409233
Z Gastroenterol. 2000 Sep;38(9):785-9
pubmed: 11072674
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 Jan-Feb;31(1):79-85
pubmed: 17259837
HPB Surg. 2000;11(5):353-8
pubmed: 10674752
Med Ultrason. 2017 Jan 31;19(1):114-116
pubmed: 28180205
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov 21;15(43):5493-7
pubmed: 19916182
Clin Nucl Med. 2018 Jul;43(7):e234-e236
pubmed: 29659400
Abdom Imaging. 2001 Sep-Oct;26(5):507-9
pubmed: 11503089
Insights Imaging. 2015 Jun;6(3):347-62
pubmed: 25790815
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun;26(6):1082
pubmed: 21564290
Ultraschall Med. 2020 Oct;41(5):562-585
pubmed: 32707595
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Oct;46(10):2579-2604
pubmed: 32713788
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Mar;142(3):539-40
pubmed: 6607641
Digestion. 2021;102(3):335-341
pubmed: 32516767