Association of EEG-fMRI Responses and Outcome After Epilepsy Surgery.
Journal
Neurology
ISSN: 1526-632X
Titre abrégé: Neurology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Aug 2021
16 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
08
12
2020
accepted:
04
08
2021
entrez:
17
8
2021
pubmed:
18
8
2021
medline:
18
8
2021
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To assess the utility of EEG-fMRI for epilepsy surgery, we evaluated surgical outcome in relation to the resection of the most significant EEG-fMRI response. Patients with post-operative neuroimaging and follow-up of at least one year were included. In EEG-fMRI responses, we defined as "primary" the cluster with the highest absolute t-value located in the cortex, and evaluated three levels of confidence for the results. The threshold for low confidence was t ≥ 3.1 (p < 0.005); the one for medium confidence corresponded to correction for multiple comparisons with a false discovery rate of 0.05; and a result reached high confidence when the primary cluster was much more significant than the next highest cluster. Concordance with the resection was determined by comparison to post-operative neuroimaging. We evaluated 106 epilepsy surgeries in 84 patients. An increasing association between concordance and surgical outcome with higher levels of confidence was demonstrated. If the peak response was not resected, the surgical outcome was likely to be poor: for the high confidence level, no patient had a good outcome; for the medium and low levels, only 18% and 28% had a good outcome. The positive predictive value remained low for all confidence levels, indicating that removing the maximum cluster did not ensure seizure freedom. Resection of the primary EEG-fMRI cluster, especially in high confidence cases, is necessary to obtain a good outcome, but not sufficient. This study provided Class II evidence that failure to resect the primary EEG-fMRI cluster is associated with poorer epilepsy surgery outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34400584
pii: WNL.0000000000012660
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012660
pmc: PMC8575131
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.
Références
Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Jul;22(3):179-92
pubmed: 15195285
Neurology. 2018 Aug 14;91(7):e666-e674
pubmed: 30006411
Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):1-15
pubmed: 11771969
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Apr;130(4):429-438
pubmed: 30769269
Front Comput Neurosci. 2017 Feb 20;11:8
pubmed: 28265244
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):676-82
pubmed: 11209064
Brain Topogr. 2013 Oct;26(4):627-40
pubmed: 23793553
Seizure. 2018 Oct;61:30-37
pubmed: 30059825
Epilepsia. 2017 May;58(5):811-823
pubmed: 28294306
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Oct;28(10):1023-32
pubmed: 17133385
Ann Neurol. 2011 Nov;70(5):822-37
pubmed: 22162063
Epilepsia. 2011 Mar;52(3):433-42
pubmed: 21054351
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Aug;131(8):1815-1823
pubmed: 32544836
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;87(6):642-9
pubmed: 26216941
Epilepsia. 2010 Sep;51(9):1837-45
pubmed: 20550554
Epilepsia. 2013 Dec;54(12):2184-94
pubmed: 24304438
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 28;8(6):e68038
pubmed: 23840805
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Jun;27(6):488-97
pubmed: 16180210
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:536-51
pubmed: 25462692
Ann Neurol. 2017 Aug;82(2):278-287
pubmed: 28749544
Epilepsia. 2017 Jan;58(1):85-93
pubmed: 27859033
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;81(8):922-7
pubmed: 20547617
Brain. 2004 May;127(Pt 5):1127-44
pubmed: 15033899
Brain. 2007 Sep;130(Pt 9):2343-53
pubmed: 17586868
Epilepsia. 2020 Jan;61(1):49-60
pubmed: 31792958
Neuroimage. 2006 May 1;30(4):1161-70
pubmed: 16413798
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 06;12:29
pubmed: 29467634