Personalizing cognitive behavioral therapy for cancer-related fatigue using ecological momentary assessments followed by automated individual time series analyses: A case report series.
Cancer survivors
Cancer-related fatigue
Cognitive behavioral therapy
Ecological momentary assessments
Individual time series analyses
Personalization
Journal
Internet interventions
ISSN: 2214-7829
Titre abrégé: Internet Interv
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101631612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
01
09
2020
revised:
29
04
2021
accepted:
06
07
2021
entrez:
17
8
2021
pubmed:
18
8
2021
medline:
18
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A common approach to personalizing psychological interventions is the allocation of treatment modules to individual patients based on cut-off scores on questionnaires, which are mostly based on group studies. However, this way, intraindividual variation and temporal dynamics are not taken into account. Automated individual time series analyses are a possible solution, since these can identify the factors influencing the targeted symptom in a specific individual, and associated modules can be allocated accordingly. The aim of this study was to illustrate how automated individual time series analyses can be applied to personalize cognitive behavioral therapy for cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivors and how this procedure differs from allocating modules based on questionnaires. This study was a case report series ( Three cases were described. From the ecological momentary assessments and automated time series analyses three individual treatment plans were constructed, in which the most important predictor for cancer-related fatigue was treated first. For two patients, this led to the treatment ending after the follow-up ecological momentary assessments. One patient continued treatment until six months, the standard treatment time in regular treatment. All three treatment plans differed from the treatment plans informed by questionnaire scores. This study is one of the first to apply time series analyses in systematically personalizing psychological treatment. An important strength of this approach is that it can be used for every modular cognitive behavioral intervention where each treatment module addresses specific maintaining factors. Whether or not personalized CBT is more efficacious than standard, non-personalized CBT remains to be determined in controlled studies comparing it to usual care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34401389
doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100430
pii: S2214-7829(21)00070-1
pmc: PMC8350606
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100430Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 May;180:461-4
pubmed: 11983645
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Apr;72(2):355-61
pubmed: 15065968
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;4(1):19-21
pubmed: 26158824
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016;51(1):106-19
pubmed: 26881960
Psychooncology. 2018 Nov;27(11):2609-2615
pubmed: 29843189
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Feb;49(2):173-82
pubmed: 25150812
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016 Mar;20(2):631-43
pubmed: 25680221
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 20;24(30):4882-7
pubmed: 17050873
Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 Jan-Feb;56(1):120-149
pubmed: 32324066
Psychosom Med. 2012 May;74(4):377-86
pubmed: 22582335
Occup Environ Med. 2000 May;57(5):353-7
pubmed: 10769302
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 3;115(27):E6106-E6115
pubmed: 29915059
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;57(3):216-36
pubmed: 26467325
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 23;15:765
pubmed: 26500019
Eur J Cancer. 2002 Jan;38(1):27-43
pubmed: 11750837
Assessment. 2016 Aug;23(4):496-506
pubmed: 26975466
Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2009 May 1;3(3):292-313
pubmed: 19898679
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 20;23(27):6613-22
pubmed: 16170168
Oncologist. 2010;15(10):1122-32
pubmed: 20930100
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Aug;21(8):2279-88
pubmed: 23519566
Soc Sci Med. 1993 Aug;37(3):385-91
pubmed: 8356486
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Mar 10;17(1):35
pubmed: 32151251
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:23-47
pubmed: 28375728
Cancer. 2017 Oct 1;123(19):3825-3834
pubmed: 28621820
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;30(6):794-804
pubmed: 20619520
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Aug 07;4(3):e100
pubmed: 26254160
J Psychosom Res. 2018 Mar;106:13-24
pubmed: 29455894
J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jul;38(5):383-92
pubmed: 7965927
Psychol Assess. 2004 Mar;16(1):16-26
pubmed: 15023089
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016 Jun;25(2):123-44
pubmed: 26395198
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jan 28;17(1):81
pubmed: 28129746
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:579-616
pubmed: 12499517
Evid Based Ment Health. 2016 Aug;19(3):86-9
pubmed: 27443678
Br J Cancer. 2007 Sep 3;97(5):612-8
pubmed: 17653075
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170
pubmed: 29550964
Compr Psychiatry. 2005 May-Jun;46(3):223-8
pubmed: 16021593
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):965-974
pubmed: 26940687