Making clinical decisions based on measurable residual disease improves the outcome in multiple myeloma.
Measurable residual disease
Minimal residual disease
Multiple myeloma
Journal
Journal of hematology & oncology
ISSN: 1756-8722
Titre abrégé: J Hematol Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101468937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 08 2021
17 08 2021
Historique:
received:
29
06
2021
accepted:
04
08
2021
entrez:
18
8
2021
pubmed:
19
8
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow has proven of prognostic relevance in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Nevertheless, and unlike other hematologic malignancies, the use of MRD results to make clinical decisions in MM has been underexplored to date. In this retrospective study, we present the results from a multinational and multicenter series of 400 patients with MRD monitoring during front-line therapy with the aim of exploring how clinical decisions made based on those MRD results affected outcomes. As expected, achievement of MRD negativity at any point was associated with improved PFS versus persistent MRD positivity (median PFS 104 vs. 45 months, p < 0.0001). In addition, however, 67 out of 400 patients underwent a clinical decision (treatment discontinuation, intensification or initiation of a new therapy) based on MRD results. Those patients in whom a treatment change was made showed a prolonged PFS in comparison with those 333 patients in which MRD results were not acted upon (respectively, mPFS 104 vs. 62 months, p = 0.005). In patients who achieved MRD negativity during maintenance (n = 186) on at least one occasion, stopping therapy in 24 patients vs. continuing in 162 did not alter PFS (mPFS 120 months vs. 82 months, p = 0.1). Most importantly, however, in patients with a positive MRD during maintenance (n = 214), a clinical decision (either intensification or change of therapy) (n = 43) resulted in better PFS compared to patients in whom no adjustment was made (n = 171) (mPFS NA vs. 39 months, p = 0.02). Interestingly, there were no significant differences when MRD was assessed by flow cytometry or by next-generation sequencing. Herein, we find that MRD is useful in guiding clinical decisions during initial therapy and has a positive impact on PFS in MM patients. This potentially opens a new dimension for the use of MRD in MM, but this role still remains to be confirmed in prospective, randomized clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34404440
doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01135-w
pii: 10.1186/s13045-021-01135-w
pmc: PMC8369640
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
126Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Blood. 2014 May 15;123(20):3073-9
pubmed: 24646471
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):57-73
pubmed: 30559051
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2900-2910
pubmed: 28498784
J Hematol Oncol. 2020 Jun 22;13(1):82
pubmed: 32571377
Semin Hematol. 2018 Jan;55(1):1-3
pubmed: 29759146
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 10;38(8):784-792
pubmed: 31770060
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):e328-e346
pubmed: 27511158
Am J Hematol. 2021 Jun 1;96(6):E193-E196
pubmed: 33661527
Blood Adv. 2020 Jul 28;4(14):3295-3301
pubmed: 32706892
Blood Adv. 2020 Dec 8;4(23):5988-5999
pubmed: 33284948