Bone remodeling and implant migration of uncemented femoral and cemented asymmetrical tibial components in total knee arthroplasty - DXA and RSA evaluation with 2-year follow up.

DXA MBRSA Persona® Total knee arthroplasty Total knee replacement

Journal

Knee surgery & related research
ISSN: 2234-0726
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Relat Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101575761

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 13 04 2021
accepted: 22 07 2021
entrez: 18 8 2021
pubmed: 19 8 2021
medline: 19 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Aseptic loosening is one of the major reasons for late revision in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risk of aseptic loosening can be detected using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), whereby micromovements (migration) can be measured, and thus RSA is recommended in the phased introduction of orthopedic implants. Decrease in bone mineral density (BMD), as measured by dual-energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA), is related to the breaking strength of the bone, which is measured concurrently by RSA. The aim of the study was to evaluate bone remodeling and implant migration with cemented asymmetrical tibial and uncemented femoral components after TKA with a follow up period of 2 years. This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 29 patients (number of female/male patients 17/12, mean age 65.2 years), received a hybrid Persona® TKA (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) consisting of a cemented tibial, an all-polyethylene patella, and uncemented trabecular metal femoral components. Follow up: preoperative, 1 week, and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, and double examinations for RSA and DXA were performed at 12 months. RSA results were presented as maximal total point of motion (MTPM) and segmental motion (translation and rotation), and DXA results were presented as changes in BMD in different regions of interest (ROI). MTPM at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 0.65 mm, 0.84 mm, 0.92 mm, and 0.96 mm for the femoral component and 0.54 mm, 0.60 mm, 0.64 mm, and 0.68 mm, respectively, for the tibial component. The highest MTPM occurred within the first 3 months. Afterwards most of the curves flattened and stabilized. Between 12 and 24 months after surgery, 16% of femoral components had migrated by more than 0.10 mm and 15% of tibial components had migrated by more than 0.2 mm. Percentage change in BMD in each ROI for distal femur was as follows: ROI I 26.7%, ROI II 9.2% and ROI III 3.3%. BMD and at the proximal tibia: ROI I 8.2%, ROI II 8.6% and ROI III 7.0% after 2 years compared with 1 week postoperative results. There was no significant correlation between maximal percentwise change in BMD and MTPM after 2 years. Migration patterns and changes in BMD related to femoral components after TKA in our study correspond well with previous studies; we observed marginally greater migration with the tibial component.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Aseptic loosening is one of the major reasons for late revision in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risk of aseptic loosening can be detected using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), whereby micromovements (migration) can be measured, and thus RSA is recommended in the phased introduction of orthopedic implants. Decrease in bone mineral density (BMD), as measured by dual-energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA), is related to the breaking strength of the bone, which is measured concurrently by RSA. The aim of the study was to evaluate bone remodeling and implant migration with cemented asymmetrical tibial and uncemented femoral components after TKA with a follow up period of 2 years.
METHODS METHODS
This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 29 patients (number of female/male patients 17/12, mean age 65.2 years), received a hybrid Persona® TKA (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) consisting of a cemented tibial, an all-polyethylene patella, and uncemented trabecular metal femoral components. Follow up: preoperative, 1 week, and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, and double examinations for RSA and DXA were performed at 12 months. RSA results were presented as maximal total point of motion (MTPM) and segmental motion (translation and rotation), and DXA results were presented as changes in BMD in different regions of interest (ROI).
RESULTS RESULTS
MTPM at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 0.65 mm, 0.84 mm, 0.92 mm, and 0.96 mm for the femoral component and 0.54 mm, 0.60 mm, 0.64 mm, and 0.68 mm, respectively, for the tibial component. The highest MTPM occurred within the first 3 months. Afterwards most of the curves flattened and stabilized. Between 12 and 24 months after surgery, 16% of femoral components had migrated by more than 0.10 mm and 15% of tibial components had migrated by more than 0.2 mm. Percentage change in BMD in each ROI for distal femur was as follows: ROI I 26.7%, ROI II 9.2% and ROI III 3.3%. BMD and at the proximal tibia: ROI I 8.2%, ROI II 8.6% and ROI III 7.0% after 2 years compared with 1 week postoperative results. There was no significant correlation between maximal percentwise change in BMD and MTPM after 2 years.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Migration patterns and changes in BMD related to femoral components after TKA in our study correspond well with previous studies; we observed marginally greater migration with the tibial component.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34404487
doi: 10.1186/s43019-021-00111-5
pii: 10.1186/s43019-021-00111-5
pmc: PMC8369662
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

25

Subventions

Organisme : Zimmer Biomet
ID : C005931

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):268-73
pubmed: 27120266
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Feb 1;25(3):285
pubmed: 10703097
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):614-24
pubmed: 23140091
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:205-9
pubmed: 18062052
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jan;103-B(1):98-104
pubmed: 33380179
Eng Med. 1985 Apr;14(2):79-83
pubmed: 4043498
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7_Supple_C):55-60
pubmed: 31256645
Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Oct;75(5):600-5
pubmed: 15513494
Acta Orthop. 2019 Apr;90(2):172-178
pubmed: 30669909
Calcif Tissue Int. 1996 Oct;59(4):311-4
pubmed: 8781060
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999;119(5-6):324-6
pubmed: 10447632
Acta Orthop Scand. 1996 Aug;67(4):339-44
pubmed: 8792735
Knee. 2008 Oct;15(5):396-402
pubmed: 18635360
J Orthop Res. 1995 May;13(3):347-56
pubmed: 7602396
Acta Orthop Scand. 1999 Dec;70(6):603-8
pubmed: 10665727
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1980 Jan-Feb;5(1):46-55
pubmed: 7361198
Acta Orthop Scand. 1988 Oct;59(5):567-73
pubmed: 3188864
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 May;88(5):606-13
pubmed: 16645105
J Clin Densitom. 2018 Apr - Jun;21(2):236-243
pubmed: 28918227
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 May;77(3):377-83
pubmed: 7744919
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jan;80(1):63-9
pubmed: 9460955
Acta Orthop. 2019 Oct;90(5):479-483
pubmed: 31269876
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):700-6
pubmed: 20194329
Acta Orthop Scand. 1995 Dec;66(6):513-6
pubmed: 8553818
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Nov;93(11):1479-86
pubmed: 22058298
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1988;77(5-6):197-203
pubmed: 3076046
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Jul;91(7):889-95
pubmed: 19567852
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jun;24(4):594-606
pubmed: 18676114
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1251-1258
pubmed: 30361757
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4
pubmed: 2805470
Orthop Clin North Am. 1999 Apr;30(2):265-77
pubmed: 10196428
Acta Orthop. 2008 Feb;79(1):22-7
pubmed: 18283568
Bone Joint J. 2013 May;95-B(5):636-42
pubmed: 23632673
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec;(321):68-72
pubmed: 7497687
Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):232-5
pubmed: 23566738
Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):563-72
pubmed: 16195075
Acta Orthop. 2018 Jun;89(3):320-328
pubmed: 29508661
Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Oct;72(5):503-13
pubmed: 11728079
Int Orthop. 2008 Feb;32(1):47-51
pubmed: 17115154
J Biomech. 2001 Jun;34(6):715-22
pubmed: 11470108
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;232:1-51
pubmed: 2686344
Knee. 2009 Jun;16(3):200-6
pubmed: 19097910
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Oct;(271):135-42
pubmed: 1914288
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93 Suppl 3:62-5
pubmed: 22262426
Radiology. 1990 Jan;174(1):223-8
pubmed: 2294552

Auteurs

Müjgan Yilmaz (M)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. yilmaz_mujgan@hotmail.com.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark. yilmaz_mujgan@hotmail.com.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. yilmaz_mujgan@hotmail.com.

Christina Enciso Holm (CE)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

Thomas Lind (T)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.

Gunnar Flivik (G)

Department of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Entrégaten 7, 222 42, Lund, Sweden.

Anders Odgaard (A)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Michael Mørk Petersen (MM)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH